Thu, 24 May 2018

16:00 - 17:30
L4

Computation of optimal transport and related hedging problems via penalization and neural networks

Michael Kupper
(University of Konstanz)
Abstract

We present a widely applicable approach to solving (multi-marginal, martingale) optimal transport and related problems via neural networks. The core idea is to penalize the optimization problem in its dual formulation and reduce it to a finite dimensional one which corresponds to optimizing a neural network with smooth objective function. We present numerical examples from optimal transport, and bounds on the distribution of a sum of dependent random variables. As an application we focus on the problem of risk aggregation under model uncertainty. The talk is based on joint work with Stephan Eckstein and Mathias Pohl.

Thu, 24 May 2018

16:00 - 17:30
L3

Understanding extreme wave events

Frederic Dias
(UCD Dublin)
Abstract

Statements in media about record wave heights being measured are more and more common, the latest being about a record wave of almost 24m in the Southern Ocean on 9 May 2018. We will review some of these wave measurements and the various techniques to measure waves. Then we will explain the various mechanisms that can produce extreme waves both in wave tanks and in the ocean. We will conclude by providing the mechanism that, we believe, explains some of the famous extreme waves. Note that extreme waves are not necessarily rogue waves and that rogue waves are not necessarily extreme waves.

Thu, 24 May 2018

14:00 - 15:00
L4

Optimization, equilibria, energy and risk

Prof. Michael Ferris
(University of Wisconsin)
Abstract


In the past few decades, power grids across the world have become dependent on markets that aim to efficiently match supply with demand at all times via a variety of pricing and auction mechanisms. These markets are based on models that capture interactions between producers, transmission and consumers. Energy producers typically maximize profits by optimally allocating and scheduling resources over time. A dynamic equilibrium aims to determine prices and dispatches that can be transmitted over the electricity grid to satisfy evolving consumer requirements for energy at different locations and times. Computation allows large scale practical implementations of socially optimal models to be solved as part of the market operation, and regulations can be imposed that aim to ensure competitive behaviour of market participants.

Questions remain that will be outlined in this presentation.

Firstly, the recent explosion in the use of renewable supply such as wind, solar and hydro has led to increased volatility in this system. We demonstrate how risk can impose significant costs on the system that are not modeled in the context of socially optimal power system markets and highlight the use of contracts to reduce or recover these costs. We also outline how battery storage can be used as an effective hedging instrument.

Secondly, how do we guarantee continued operation in rarely occuring situations and when failures occur and how do we price this robustness?

Thirdly, how do we guarantee appropriate participant behaviour? Specifically, is it possible for participants to develop strategies that move the system to operating points that are not socially optimal?

Fourthly, how do we ensure enough transmission (and generator) capacity in the long term, and how do we recover the costs of this enhanced infrastructure?
 

Thu, 24 May 2018

12:00 - 13:00
L5

The Cauchy problem in General Relativity and Kaluza Klein spacetimes

Zoe Wyatt
(University of Edinburgh and MIGSAA)
Abstract

In this talk I will start with a brief overview of the Cauchy problem for the Einstein equations of general relativity, and in particular the nonlinear stability of the trivial Minkowski solution in wave gauge as shown by Lindblad and Rodnianski. I will then discuss the Kaluza Klein spacetime of the form $R^{1+3} \times K$ where $K$ is the $n-$torus with the flat metric.  An interesting question to ask is whether this solution to the Einstein equations, viewed as an initial value problem, is stable to small perturbations of the initial data. Motivated by this problem, I will outline how the proof of stability in a restricted class of perturbations in fact follows from the work of Lindblad and Rodnianski, and discuss the physical justification behind this restriction. 

Wed, 23 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
C5

Growth in Virtually Abelian Groups

Alex Evetts
(Heriot-Watt University)
Abstract

Elements of a finitely generated group have a natural notion of length: namely the length of a shortest word over the generators that represents the element. This allows us to study the growth of such groups by considering the size of spheres with increasing radii. One current area of interest is the rationality or otherwise of the formal power series whose coefficients are the sphere sizes. I will describe a combinatorial way to study this series for the class of virtually abelian groups, introduced by Benson in the 1980s, and then outline its applications to other types of growth series.

Tue, 22 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
L5

Some questions on class field theory and model theory

Minhyong Kim
(Oxford)
Abstract

This lecture will give a brief review of the theory of non-abelian reciprocity maps and their applications to Diophantine geometry, and pose some questions for model-theorists.
 

Tue, 22 May 2018

15:45 - 16:45
L4

A Recursive Formula for Log Gromov-Witten Invariants

Navid Nabijou
(Imperial College London)
Abstract

Given a smooth variety X containing a smooth divisor Y, the relative Gromov-Witten invariants of (X,Y) are defined as certain counts of algebraic curves in X with specified orders of tangency to Y. Their intrinsic interest aside, they are an important part of any Gromov-Witten theorist’s toolkit, thanks to their role in the celebrated “degeneration formula.” In recent years these invariants have been significantly generalised, using techniques in logarithmic geometry. The resulting “log Gromov-Witten invariants” are defined for a large class of targets, and in particular give a rigorous definition of relative invariants for (X,D) where D is a normal crossings divisor. Besides being more general, these numbers are  intimately related to constructions in Mirror Symmetry, via the Gross-Siebert program. In this talk, we will describe a recursive formula for computing the invariants of (X,D) in genus zero. The result relies on a comparison theorem which expresses the log Gromov-Witten invariants as classical (i.e. non log-geometric) objects.
 

Tue, 22 May 2018

14:30 - 15:00
L5

Proximal methods for Mean Field Games with local couplings

Dr Dante Kalise
(Imperial College)
Abstract

In this talk we address the numerical approximation of Mean Field Games with local couplings. For finite difference discretizations of the Mean Field Game system, we follow a variational approach, proving that the schemes can be obtained as the optimality system of suitably defined optimization problems. In order to prove the existence of solutions of the scheme with a variational argument, the monotonicity of the coupling term is not used, which allow us to recover general existence results. Next, assuming next that the coupling term is monotone, the variational problem is cast as a convex optimization problem for which we study and compare several proximal type methods. These algorithms have several interesting features, such as global convergence and stability with respect to the viscosity parameter. We conclude by presenting numerical experiments assessing the performance of the proposed methods. In collaboration with L. Briceno-Arias (Valparaiso, CL) and F. J. Silva (Limoges, FR).

Tue, 22 May 2018

14:15 - 15:30
L4

g-algebras and the representations of their invariant subrings.

Anthony Joseph
(Weizmann Institute)
Abstract

Let $\mathfrak g$ be a semisimple Lie algebra.  A $\mathfrak g$-algebra is an associative algebra $R$ on which $\mathfrak g$ acts by derivations.  There are several significant examples.  Let $V$ a finite dimensional $\mathfrak g$ module and take  $R=\mathrm{End} V$ or $R=D(V)$ being the ring of derivations on  $V$ . Again take $R=U(\mathfrak g)$.   In all these cases  $ S=U(\mathfrak g)\otimes R$ is again a $\mathfrak g$-algebra.  Finally let $T$ denote the subalgebra of invariants of $S$.
 
For the first choice of $R$ above the representation theory of $T$ can be rather explicitly described in terms of Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials.  In the second case the simple $T$ modules can be described in terms of the simple $D(V)$ modules.  In the third case it is shown that all simple $T$ modules are finite dimensional, despite the fact that $T$ is not a PI ring,  except for the case $\mathfrak  g =\mathfrak {sl}(2)$.

Tue, 22 May 2018

14:00 - 14:30
L5

Storage optimal semidefinite programming

Volkan Cevher
(École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL))
Abstract

Semidefinite convex optimization problems often have low-rank solutions that can be represented with O(p)-storage. However, semidefinite programming methods require us to store the matrix decision variable with size O(p^2), which prevents the application of virtually all convex methods at large scale.

Indeed, storage, not arithmetic computation, is now the obstacle that prevents us from solving large- scale optimization problems. A grand challenge in contemporary optimization is therefore to design storage-optimal algorithms that provably and reliably solve large-scale optimization problems in key scientific and engineering applications. An algorithm is called storage optimal if its working storage is within a constant factor of the memory required to specify a generic problem instance and its solution.

So far, convex methods have completely failed to satisfy storage optimality. As a result, the literature has largely focused on storage optimal non-convex methods to obtain numerical solutions. Unfortunately, these algorithms have been shown to be provably correct only under unverifiable and unrealistic statistical assumptions on the problem template. They can also sacrifice the key benefits of convexity, as they do not use key convex geometric properties in their cost functions.

To this end, my talk introduces a new convex optimization algebra to obtain numerical solutions to semidefinite programs with a low-rank matrix streaming model. This streaming model provides us an opportunity to integrate sketching as a new tool for developing storage optimal convex optimization methods that go beyond semidefinite programming to more general convex templates. The resulting algorithms are expected to achieve unparalleled results for scalable matrix optimization problems in signal processing, machine learning, and computer science.

Tue, 22 May 2018

12:30 - 13:30
C3

Cascade-Recovery Dynamics on Complex Networks

Nanxin Wei
(Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London)
Abstract


Cascading phenomena are prevalent in natural and social-technical complex networks. We study the persistent cascade-recovery dynamics on random networks which are robust against small trigger but may collapse for larger one. It is observed that depending on the relative intensity of triggering and recovery, the network belongs one of the two dynamical phases: collapsing or active phase. We devise an analytical framework which characterizes not only the critical behaviour but also the temporal evolution of network activity in both phases. Results from agent-based simulations show good agreement with theoretical calculations. This work is an important attempt in understanding networked systems gradually evolving into a state of critical transition, with many potential applications.
 

Tue, 22 May 2018

12:00 - 13:15
L4

Towards an M5-brane model: A 6d superconformal field theory

Christian Saemann
(Heriot Watt University)
Abstract

I will discuss a classical six-dimensional superconformal field theory containing a non-abelian tensor multiplet which we recently constructed in arXiv:1712.06623.

This theory satisfies many of the properties of the mysterious (2,0)-theory: non-abelian 2-form potentials, ADE-type gauge structure, reduction to Yang-Mills theory and reduction to M2-brane models. There are still some crucial differences to the (2,0)-theory, but our action seems to be a key stepping stone towards a potential classical formulation of the (2,0)-theory.

I will review in detail the underlying mathematics of categorified gauge algebras and categorified connections, which make our constructions possible.

 

Mon, 21 May 2018

16:00 - 17:00
L4

Recent advances in analysis of critical points of Landau-de Gennes energy in 2D and 3D

Georgy Kitavtsev
(Oxford)
Abstract

In the first part of this talk the two-dimensional Landau-de Gennes energy with several elastic constants, subject to general k-radial symmetric boundary conditions, will be analysed. It will be shown that for generic elastic constants the critical points consistent with the symmetry of the boundary conditions exist only in the case k=2. Analysis of the associated harmonic map type problem arising in the limit of small elastic constants allows to identify three types of radial profiles: with two, three or full five components. In the second part of the talk different paths for emergency of non-radially symmetric solutions and their analytical structure in 2D as well as 3D cases will be discussed. These results is a joint work with Jonathan Robbins, Valery Slastikov and Arghir Zarnescu.
 

Mon, 21 May 2018

15:45 - 16:45
L3

Invariants of the signature

JOSCHA DIEHL
(Max Planck Institute Leipzig)
Abstract

Based on classical invariant theory, I describe a complete set of elements of the signature that is invariant to the general linear group, rotations or permutations.

A geometric interpretation of some of these invariants will be given.

Joint work with Jeremy Reizenstein (Warwick).

Mon, 21 May 2018
15:45
L5

Unbounded rank expanders, property (T), and upgrading

Masato Mimura
(EPFL Lausanne)
Abstract

The problem of "unbounded rank expanders" asks 
whether we can endow a system of generators with a sequence of 
special linear groups whose degrees tend to infinity over quotient rings 
of Z such that the resulting Cayley graphs form an expander family.
Kassabov answered this question in the affirmative. Furthermore, the 
completely satisfactory solution to this question was given by 
Ershov and Jaikin--Zapirain (Invent. Math., 2010);  they proved
Kazhdan's property (T) for elementary groups over non-commutative 
rings. (T) is equivalent to the fixed point property with respect to 
actions on Hilbert spaces by isometries.

We provide a new framework to "upgrade" relative fixed point 
properties for small subgroups to the fixed point property for the 
whole group. It is inspired by work of Shalom (ICM, 2006). Our 
main criterion is stated only in terms of intrinsic group structure 
(but *without* employing any form of bounded generation). 
This, in particular, supplies a simpler (but not quantitative) 
alternative proof of the aforementioned result of Ershov and 
Jaikin--Zapirain.  

If time permits, we will discuss other applications of our result.

Mon, 21 May 2018

14:15 - 15:15
L3

Algebraic flow

DANYU YANG
(Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
Abstract

We present an algebraic formulation for the flow of a differential equation driven by a path in a Lie group. The formulation is motivated by formal differential equations considered by Chen.

Mon, 21 May 2018

14:15 - 15:15
L4

Higher rank local systems and topology of monotone Lagrangians in projective space

Momchil Konstantinov
(UCL)
Abstract

Lagrangian Floer cohomology can be enriched by using local coefficients to record some homotopy data about the boundaries of the holomorphic disks counted by the theory. In this talk I will explain how one can do this under the monotonicity assumption and when the Lagrangians are equipped with local systems of rank higher than one. The presence of holomorphic discs of Maslov index 2 poses a potential obstruction to such an extension. However, for an appropriate choice of local systems the obstruction might vanish and, if not,
one can always restrict to some natural unobstructed subcomplexes. I will showcase these constructions with some explicit calculations for the Chiang Lagrangian in CP^3 showing that it cannot be disjoined from RP^3 by a Hamiltonian isotopy, answering a question of Evans-Lekili. Time permitting, I will also discuss some work-in-progress on the topology of monotone Lagrangians in CP^3, part of which follows from more general joint work with Jack Smith on the topology of monotone Lagrangians of maximal Maslov number in
projective spaces.

 

Mon, 21 May 2018
12:45
L3

Exotic Rational Conformal Field Theories and the Modular Bootstrap

Sunil Mukhi
(IISER Pune)
Abstract

 I will summarise old and recent developments on the classification and solution of Rational Conformal Field Theories in 2 dimensions using the method of Modular Differential Equations. Novel and exotic theories are found with small numbers of characters and simple fusion rules, one of these being the Baby Monster CFT. Correlation functions for many of these theories can be computed using crossing-symmetric differential equations.

 
Fri, 18 May 2018

14:15 - 15:15
C3

Modelling Steaming Surtseyan Bombs

Mark McGuinness
(Victoria University of Wellington)
Abstract


A Surstseyan eruption is a particular kind of volcanic eruption which involves the bulk interaction of water and hot magma. Surtsey Island was born during such an eruption process in the 1940s. I will talk about mathematical modelling of the flashing of water to steam inside a hot erupted lava ball called a Surtseyan bomb. The overall motivation is to understand what determines whether such a bomb will fragment or just quietly fizzle out...
Partial differential equations model transient changes in temperature and pressure in Surtseyan ejecta. We have used a highly simplified approach to the temperature behaviour, to separate temperature from pressure. The resulting pressure diffusion equation was solved numerically and asymptotically to derive a single parametric condition for rupture of ejecta. We found that provided the permeability of the magma ball is relatively large, steam escapes rapidly enough to relieve the high pressure developed at the flashing front, so that rupture does not occur. This rupture criterion is consistent with existing field estimates of the permeability of intact Surtseyan bombs, fizzlers that have survived.
I describe an improvement of this model that allows for the fact that pressure and temperature are in fact coupled, and that the process is not adiabatic. A more systematic reduction of the resulting coupled nonlinear partial differential equations that arise from mass, momentum and energy conservation is described. We adapt an energy equation presented in G.K. Batchelor's book {\em An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics} that allows for pressure-work. This is work in progress.  Work done with Emma Greenbank, Ian Schipper and Andrew Fowler 

Fri, 18 May 2018

13:00 - 14:00
L6

A probabilistic approach to non-parametric local volatility

Martin Tegner
Abstract

The local volatility model is a celebrated model widely used for pricing and hedging financial derivatives. While the model’s main appeal is its capability of reproducing any given surface of observed option prices—it provides a perfect fit—the essential component of the model is a latent function which can only be unambiguously determined in the limit of infinite data. To (re)construct this function, numerous calibration methods have been suggested involving steps of interpolation and extrapolation, most often of parametric form and with point-estimates as result. We seek to look at the calibration problem in a probabilistic framework with a nonparametric approach based on Gaussian process priors. This immediately gives a way of encoding prior believes about the local volatility function, and a hypothesis model which is highly flexible whilst being prone to overfitting. Besides providing a method for calibrating a (range of) point-estimate, we seek to draw posterior inference on the distribution over local volatility to better understand the uncertainty attached with the calibration. Further, we seek to understand dynamical properties of local volatility by augmenting the hypothesis space with a time dimension. Ideally, this gives us means of inferring predictive distributions not only locally, but also for entire surfaces forward in time.

Fri, 18 May 2018
12:00
N3.12

Which neural codes are convex?

Anne Shiu
(Texas A&M University)
Abstract

This talk focuses on algebraic and combinatorial-topological problems motivated by neuroscience. Neural codes allow the brain to represent, process, and store information about the world. Combinatorial codes, comprised of binary patterns of neural activity, encode information via the collective behavior of populations of neurons. A code is called convex if its codewords correspond to regions defined by an arrangement of convex open sets in Euclidean space. Convex codes have been observed experimentally in many brain areas, including sensory cortices and the hippocampus,where neurons exhibit convex receptive fields. What makes a neural code convex? That is, how can we tell from the intrinsic structure of a code if there exists a corresponding arrangement of convex open sets?

This talk describes how to use tools from combinatorics and commutative algebra to uncover a variety of signatures of convex and non-convex codes.

This talk is based on joint works with Aaron Chen and Florian Frick, and with Carina Curto, Elizabeth Gross, Jack Jeffries, Katie Morrison, Mohamed Omar, Zvi Rosen, and Nora Youngs.