Mon, 25 Feb 2019

15:45 - 16:45
L3

Reinforcement and random media

XIAOLIN ZENG
(University of Strasbourg)
Abstract

Abstract: The edge reinforced random walk is a self-interacting process, in which the random walker prefer visited edges with a bias proportional to the number of times the edges were visited. We will gently introduce this model and talk about some of its histories and recent progresses.

 

Mon, 25 Feb 2019
15:45
L6

Twisted Blanchfield pairings and Casson-Gordon invariants

Anthony Conway
(Durham University)
Abstract

 In the late seventies, Casson and Gordon developed several knot invariants that obstruct a knot from being slice, i.e. from bounding a disc in the 4-ball. In this talk, we use twisted Blanchfield pairings to define twisted generalisations of the Levine-Tristram signature function, and describe their relation to the Casson-Gordon invariants. If time permits, we will present some obstructions to algebraic knots being slice. This is joint work with Maciej Borodzik and Wojciech Politarczyk.

Mon, 25 Feb 2019

14:15 - 15:15
L3

Angles of Random Polytopes

DMITRY ZAPOROZHETS
(St. Petersburg University)
Abstract

We will consider some problems on calculating  the average  angles of random polytopes. Some of them are open.

Mon, 25 Feb 2019
14:15
L4

Tropically constructed Lagrangians in mirror quintic threefolds

Cheuk Yu Mak
(Cambridge University)
Abstract

In this talk, we will explain how to construct embedded closed Lagrangian submanifolds in mirror quintic threefolds using tropical curves and the toric degeneration technique. As an example, we will illustrate the construction for tropical curves that contribute to the Gromov–Witten invariant of the line class of the quintic threefold. The construction will in turn provide many homologous and non-Hamiltonian isotopic Lagrangian
rational homology spheres, and a geometric interpretation of the multiplicity of a tropical curve as the weight of a Lagrangian. This is a joint work with Helge Ruddat.

 

Mon, 25 Feb 2019
12:45
L5

The Laplacian flow in G_2 geometry

Jason Lotay
(Oxford)
Abstract

Finding Riemannian metrics with holonomy G_2 is a challenging problem with links in mathematics to Einstein metrics and area-minimizing submanifolds, and to M-theory in theoretical physics.  I will provide a brief survey on recent progress towards studying this problem using a geometric flow approach, including connections to calibrated fibrations.

Fri, 22 Feb 2019

14:00 - 15:00
C2

The viscosities of partially molten materials undergoing diffusion creep

John Rudge
(University of Cambridge)
Abstract

Partially molten materials resist shearing and compaction. This resistance

is described by a fourth-rank effective viscosity tensor. When the tensor

is isotropic, two scalars determine the resistance: an effective shear and

an effective bulk viscosity. In this seminar, calculations are presented of

the effective viscosity tensor during diffusion creep for a 3D tessellation of

tetrakaidecahedrons (truncated octahedrons). The geometry of the melt is

determined by assuming textural equilibrium.  Two parameters

control the effect of melt on the viscosity tensor: the porosity and the

dihedral angle. Calculations for both Nabarro-Herring (volume diffusion)

and Coble (surface diffusion) creep are presented. For Nabarro-Herring

creep the bulk viscosity becomes singular as the porosity vanishes. This

singularity is logarithmic, a weaker singularity than typically assumed in

geodynamic models. The presence of a small amount of melt (0.1% porosity)

causes the effective shear viscosity to approximately halve. For Coble creep,

previous modelling work has argued that a very small amount of melt may

lead to a substantial, factor of 5, drop in the shear viscosity. Here, a

much smaller, factor of 1.4, drop is obtained.

Fri, 22 Feb 2019

14:00 - 15:00
L1

How we learn

Dr Iro Xenidou-Dervou
Abstract

How do humans process information? What are their strengths and limitations? This crash course in cognitive psychology will provide the background necessary to think realistically about how learning works.

Fri, 22 Feb 2019

14:00 - 15:00
L3

Programming languages for molecular and genetic devices

Dr Andrew Phillips
(Head of Biological Computation Group Microsoft Research Cambridge)
Abstract

Computational nucleic acid devices show great potential for enabling a broad range of biotechnology applications, including smart probes for molecular biology research, in vitro assembly of complex compounds, high-precision in vitro disease diagnosis and, ultimately, computational therapeutics inside living cells. This diversity of applications is supported by a range of implementation strategies, including nucleic acid strand displacement, localisation to substrates, and the use of enzymes with polymerase, nickase and exonuclease functionality. However, existing computational design tools are unable to account for these different strategies in a unified manner. This talk presents a programming language that allows a broad range of computational nucleic acid systems to be designed and analysed. We also demonstrate how similar approaches can be incorporated into a programming language for designing genetic devices that are inserted into cells to reprogram their behaviour. The language is used to characterise the genetic components for programming populations of cells that communicate and self-organise into spatial patterns. More generally, we anticipate that languages and software for programming molecular and genetic devices will accelerate the development of future biotechnology applications.

Fri, 22 Feb 2019

12:00 - 13:00
L4

The Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Training Generative Adversarial Networks

Arthur Gretton
(UCL Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit)
Abstract

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) use neural networks as generative models, creating realistic samples that mimic real-life reference samples (for instance, images of faces, bedrooms, and more). These networks require an adaptive critic function while training, to teach the networks how to move improve their samples to better match the reference data. I will describe a kernel divergence measure, the maximum mean discrepancy, which represents one such critic function. With gradient regularisation, the MMD is used to obtain current state-of-the art performance on challenging image generation tasks, including 160 × 160 CelebA and 64 × 64 ImageNet. In addition to adversarial network training, I'll discuss issues of gradient bias for GANs based on integral probability metrics, and mechanisms for benchmarking GAN performance.

Fri, 22 Feb 2019

11:45 - 13:15
L2

InFoMM CDT Group Meeting

Helen Fletcher, Bogdan Toader, Jessica Williams, Giuseppe Ughi
(Mathematical Institute)
Thu, 21 Feb 2019
17:00
L5

Actions of automorphism groups of omega-categorical structures on compact spaces

David Evans
(Imperial College, London)
Abstract

If G is a topological group, a G-flow X is a non-empty, compact, Hausdorff space on which G acts continuously; it is minimal if all G-orbits are dense. By a theorem of Ellis, there is a (unique) minimal G-flow M(G) which is universal: there is a continuous G-map to every other G-flow. 

Here, we will be interested in the case where G = Aut(K) for some structure K, usually omega-categorical. Work of Kechris, Pestov and Todorcevic and others gives conditions on K under which structural Ramsey Theory (due to Nesetril - Rodl and others) can be used to compute M(G). 

In the first part of the talk I will give a description of the above theory and when it applies (the 'tame case'). In the second part, I will describe joint work with J. Hubicka and J. Nesetril which shows that the omega-categorical structures constructed in the late 1980's by Hrushovski as counterexamples to Lachlan's conjecture are not tame and moreover, minimal flows of their automorphism groups have rather different properties to those in the tame case. 

Thu, 21 Feb 2019

16:00 - 17:00
L6

GCD sums and sum-product estimates

Aled Walker
(University of Cambridge)
Abstract


When S is a finite set of natural numbers, a GCD-sum is a particular kind of double-sum over the elements of S, and they arise naturally in several settings. In particular, these sums play a role when one studies the local statistics of point sequences on the unit circle. There are known upper bounds for the size of a GCD-sum in terms of the size of the set S, most recently due to de la Bretèche and Tenenbaum, and these bounds are sharp. Yet the known examples of sets S for which the GCD-sum over S provides a matching lower bound all possess strong multiplicative structure, whereas in applications the set S often comes with additive structure. In this talk I will describe recent joint work with Thomas Bloom in which we apply an estimate from sum-product theory to prove a much stronger upper bound on a GCD-sum over an additively structured set. I will also describe an application of this improvement to the study of the distribution of points on the unit circle, with a further application to arbitrary infinite subsets of squares. 

Thu, 21 Feb 2019

16:00 - 17:30
L4

Zero-sum stopping games with asymmetric information

Jan Palczewski
(Leeds University)
Abstract

We study the value of a zero-sum stopping game in which the terminal payoff function depends on the underlying process and on an additional randomness (with finitely many states) which is known to one player but unknown to the other. Such asymmetry of information arises naturally in insider trading when one of the counterparties knows an announcement before it is publicly released, e.g., central bank's interest rates decision or company earnings/business plans. In the context of game options this splits the pricing problem into the phase before announcement (asymmetric information) and after announcement (full information); the value of the latter exists and forms the terminal payoff of the asymmetric phase.

The above game does not have a value if both players use pure stopping times as the informed player's actions would reveal too much of his excess knowledge. The informed player manages the trade-off between releasing information and stopping optimally employing randomised stopping times. We reformulate the stopping game as a zero-sum game between a stopper (the uninformed player) and a singular controller (the informed player). We prove existence of the value of the latter game for a large class of underlying strong Markov processes including multi-variate diffusions and Feller processes. The main tools are approximations by smooth singular controls and by discrete-time games.

Thu, 21 Feb 2019
16:00
C4

The Story of C^infinity Algebraic Geometry

Kelli Francis-Staite
(Oxford University)
Abstract

After considering motivations in symplectic geometry, I’ll give a summary of $C^\infty$-Algebraic Geometry and how to extend these concepts to manifolds with corners. 

Thu, 21 Feb 2019

16:00 - 17:30
L3

Strategies for Multilevel Monte Carlo for Bayesian Inversion

Professor Kody Law
(University of Manchester)
Abstract

This talk will concern the problem of inference when the posterior measure involves continuous models which require approximation before inference can be performed. Typically one cannot sample from the posterior distribution directly, but can at best only evaluate it, up to a normalizing constant. Therefore one must resort to computationally-intensive inference algorithms in order to construct estimators. These algorithms are typically of Monte Carlo type, and include for example Markov chain Monte Carlo, importance samplers, and sequential Monte Carlo samplers. The multilevel Monte Carlo method provides a way of optimally balancing discretization and sampling error on a hierarchy of approximation levels, such that cost is optimized. Recently this method has been applied to computationally intensive inference. This non-trivial task can be achieved in a variety of ways. This talk will review 3 primary strategies which have been successfully employed to achieve optimal (or canonical) convergence rates – in other words faster convergence than i.i.d. sampling at the finest discretization level. Some of the specific resulting algorithms, and applications, will also be presented.

Thu, 21 Feb 2019

14:00 - 15:00
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, nr Didcot

Tomographic imaging with flat-field uncertainty

Prof Martin Skovgaard Andersen
(Danish Technical University)
Abstract

Classical methods for X-ray computed tomography (CT) are based on the assumption that the X-ray source intensity is known. In practice, however, the intensity is measured and hence uncertain. Under normal circumstances, when the exposure time is sufficiently high, this kind of uncertainty typically has a negligible effect on the reconstruction quality. However, in time- or dose-limited applications such as dynamic CT, this uncertainty may cause severe and systematic artifacts known as ring artifacts.
By modeling the measurement process and by taking uncertainties into account, it is possible to derive a convex reconstruction model that leads to improved reconstructions when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. We discuss some computational challenges associated with the model and illustrate its merits with some numerical examples based on simulated and real data.

Thu, 21 Feb 2019
12:00
L4

The relationship between failure of a Liouville type theorem and Type I singularities of the Navier-Stokes equations

Tobias Barker
(École Normale Superieure (DMA))
Abstract

In this talk, we demonstrate that formation of Type I singularities of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations occur if there exists non-zero mild bounded ancient solutions satisfying a 'Type I' decay condition. We will also discuss some new Liouville type Theorems. Joint work with Dallas Albritton (University of Minnesota).

Wed, 20 Feb 2019

17:00 - 18:00
C1

Virtual fibring of manifolds and groups

Dawid Kielak
Abstract

I will discuss Agol's proof of the Virtually Fibred Conjecture of
Thurston, focusing on the role played by the `RFRS' property. I will
then show how one can modify parts of Agol's proof by replacing some
topological considerations with a group theoretic statement about
virtual fibring of RFRS groups.
 

Wed, 20 Feb 2019
16:00
C1

Pathological topology in boundaries of hyperbolic groups

Benjamin Barrett
(Bristol University)
Abstract

In geometric group theory we study groups by their actions on metric spaces. Although a given group might admit many actions on different metric spaces, on a large scale these spaces will all look similar, and so the large scale properties of a space on which a group acts are intrinsic to the group. One particularly natural example of a large scale property used in this way is the Gromov boundary of a hyperbolic metric space. This is a topological space that can be thought of as compactifying the metric space at infinity. 

In this talk I will describe some constructions of spaces occurring in this way with nasty, fractal-like properties. On the other hand, there are limits to how pathological these spaces can be: theorems of Bestvina and Mess, Bowditch and Swarup imply that boundaries of hyperbolic groups are locally path connected whenever they are connected. I will discuss these results and some generalisations. 

Wed, 20 Feb 2019
16:00
C2

‘Expansivity and shadowing’

Chris Good
(Birmingham)
Abstract

Abstract:   Let $f$ be a continuous surjection from the compact metric space $X$ to itself. 

 

We say that the dynamical system $(X,f)$ has shadowing if for every $\epsilon>0$ there is a $\delta>0$ such that every $\delta$-pseudo orbit is $\epsilon$-shadowed.  Here a sequence $(x_n)$ is a $\delta$-pseudo orbit provided the distance from $f(x_n)$ to $x_{n+1}$ is less than $\delta$ and $(x_n)$ is $\epsilon$-shadowed if there is a point $z$ such that the distance from $x_n$ to $f^n(z)$ is less than $\epsilon$.  

 

If $f$ is a homeomorphism, $(X,f)$ is said to be expansive if there is some $c>0$, such that if the distance from $f^n(x)$ and $f^n(y)$ is less than $c$ for all $n\in \mathbb Z$, then $x=y$.

 

In his proof that a homeomorphism that is expansive and has shadowing is stable, Walters shows that in an expansive system with shadowing, a pseudo orbit is shadowed by exactly one point.  It turns out that the converse is also true: if the system has unique shadowing (in the above sense), then it is expansive.

 

In this talk, which is joint work with Joel Mitchell and Joe Thomas, we explore this notion of unique shadowing.

Wed, 20 Feb 2019
11:00
N3.12

A curve in the Möbius band

Esteban Gomezllata Marmolejo
(University of Oxford)
Abstract


Suppose that you have a long strip of paper, and draw the central line through it. You then glue it together so as to make a Möbius band. Can the drawn curve be contained in a plane?

We'll answer the question in this talk, as well as introduce the concepts from the Geometry of Surfaces course required to go through it; including Gauss' one and only Theorema Egregium! (we won't prove it though).

Tue, 19 Feb 2019

14:30 - 15:30

The generalised Oberwolfach problem

Katherine Staden
Further Information

Recently, much progress has been made on the general problem of decomposing a dense (usually complete) graph into a given family of sparse graphs (e.g. Hamilton cycles or trees). I will present a new result of this type: that any quasirandom dense large graph in which all degrees are equal and even can be decomposed into any given collection of two-factors (2-regular spanning subgraphs). A special case of this result reproves the Oberwolfach problem for large graphs.

 

This is joint work with Peter Keevash.

Tue, 19 Feb 2019

14:30 - 15:00
L3

Univariate and Multivariate Polynomials in Numerical Analysis

Lloyd N. Trefethen
(Oxford)
Abstract

We begin by reviewing numerical methods for problems in one variable and find that univariate polynomials are the starting point for most of them.  A similar review in several variables, however, reveals that multivariate polynomials are not so important.  Why?  On the other hand in pure mathematics, the field of algebraic geometry is precisely the study of multivariate polynomials.  Why?