A few years back, Smale spaces were shown to exhibit noncommutative Poincaré duality (with Jerry Kaminker and Ian Putnam). The fundamental class was represented as an extension by the compacts. In current work we describe a Fredholm module representation of the fundamental class. The proof uses delicate approximations of the Smale space arising from a refining sequence of (open) Markov partition covers. I hope to explain all these notions in an elementary manner. This is joint work with Dimitris Gerontogiannis and Joachim Zacharias.

Groupoid C*-algebras and twisted groupoid C*-algebras are introduced by Renault in the late ’70. Twisted groupoid C*-algebras have since proved extremely important in the study of structural properties for large classes of C*-algebras. On the other hand, Steinberg algebras are introduced independently by Steinberg and Clark, Farthing, Sims and Tomforde around 2010 which are a purely algebraic analogue of groupoid C*-algebras. Steinberg algebras provide useful insight into the analytic theory of groupoid C*-algebras and give rise to interesting examples of *-algebras. In this talk, I will first recall some relevant background on topological groupoids and twisted groupoid C*-algebras, then I will introduce twisted Steinberg algebras which generalise the Steinberg algebras and provide a purely algebraic analogue of twisted groupoid C*-algebras. If I have enough time, I will further introduce pair of algebras which consist of a Steinberg algebra and an algebra of locally constant functions on the unit space, it is an algebraic analogue of Cartan pairs

We will give a general overview of how one gets groups to act on CAT(0) cube complexes, how compatible such actions are and how this plays out in the setting of Coxeter groups.

We show that ribbon concordance forms a partial ordering on the set of knots, answering a question of Gordon. The proof makes use of representation varieties of the knot groups to S O(N) and relations between them induced by a ribbon concordance.

Gerbes are geometric objects describing the third integer cohomology group of a manifold and the B-field in string theory. Like line bundles, they admit connections and gauge symmetries. In contrast to line bundles, however, there are now isomorphisms between gauge symmetries: the gauge group of a gerbe is a smooth 2-group. Starting from a hands-on example, I will explain gerbes and some of their properties. The main topic of this talk will then be the study of symmetries of gerbes on a manifold with G-action, and how these symmetries assemble into smooth 2-group extensions of G. In the last part, I will survey how this construction can be used to provide a new smooth model for the String group, via a theory of ∞-categorical principal bundles and group extensions.

A standard question in group theory is to ask if we can categorise the subgroups of a group in terms of their growth. In this talk we will be asking this question for uniform product set growth, a property that is stronger than the more widely understood notion of uniform exponential growth. We will see how considering acylindrical actions on hyperbolic spaces can help us, and give a particular application to mapping class groups.

Via Poincaré duality, fundamental groups of aspherical manifolds have (appropriately shifted) isomorphisms between their homology and cohomology. In a 1973 Inventiones paper, Bieri and Eckmann defined a broader notion of a Duality Group, where the isomorphism between homology and cohomology can be twisted by what they called a Dualizing Module. Examples of these groups in geometric group theory (after passing to a finite-index subgroup) include $GL(n,\mathbb{Z})$, mapping class groups, and automorphism groups of free groups.

In work-in-progress with Thomas Wasserman we are looking into the following puzzle: the examples of duality groups that we know of that do not come from manifolds all have classifying spaces that satisfy a weaker local condition called the Cohen-Macaulay property. These spaces also satisfy weaker (twisted) versions of Poincaé duality via their local homology sheaves (or local cohomology cosheaves), and we are attempting to understand more about the links between these geometric versions of duality and the algebraic notion of a duality group. The goal of the talk is to explain more about the words used in the above paragraphs and say where we have got to so far.


 

We will review some open questions about automorphisms of free groups, give some partial answers, and explain the deformation spaces of trees that they act on, as well as the geometry of these spaces arising from the Lipschitz metric. This will be a gentle introduction to the topic, focused on introducing the concepts.