Mon, 23 Apr 2018

16:00 - 17:00
L4

3-D axisymmetric subsonic flows with nonzero swirl for the compressible Euler-Poisson system

Myoungjean Bae
(Postech and Oxford)
Abstract

I will present a recent result on the structural stability of 3-D axisymmetric subsonic flows with nonzero swirl for the steady compressible Euler–Poisson system in a cylinder supplemented with non-small boundary data. A special Helmholtz decomposition of the velocity field is introduced for 3-D axisymmetric flow with a nonzero swirl (=angular momentum density) component. This talk is based on a joint work with S. Weng (Wuhan University, China).
 

Americans drink an average of 3.1 cups of coffee per day (and mathematicans probably even more). When carrying a liquid, common sense says walk slowly and refrain from overfilling the container. But easier said than followed. Cue sloshing.

Fri, 09 Mar 2018

14:15 - 15:15
C3

Particles in Fluid Flows: How Microscopic Processes Impact Macroscopic Evolution

Bruce Sutherland
(University of Alberta)
Abstract

Through laboratory experiments, we examine the transport, settling and resuspension of sediments as well as the influence of floating particles upon damping wave motion.   Salt water is shown to enhance flocculation of clay and hence increase their settling rate.   In studies modelling sediment-bearing (hypopycnal) river plumes, experiments show that the particles that eventually settle through uniform-density fluid toward a sloping bottom form a turbidity current.  Meanwhile, even though the removal of particles should increase the buoyancy and hence speed of the surface current, in reality the surface current stops.  This reveals that the removal of fresh water carried by the viscous boundary layers surrounding the settling particles drains the current even when their concentration by volume is less than 5%. The microscopic effect of boundary layer transport by particles upon the large scale evolution is dramatically evident in the circumstance of a mesopycnal particle-bearing current that advances along the interface of a two-layer fluid.  As the fresh water rises and particles fall, the current itself stops and reverses direction.  As a final example, the periodic separation and consolidation of particles floating on a surface perturbed by surface waves is shown to damp faster than exponentially to attain a finite-time arrest as a result of efficiently damped flows through interstitial spaces between particles - a phenomenon that may be important for understanding the damping of surface waves by sea ice in the Arctic Ocean (and which is well-known to anyone drinking a pint with a proper head or a margarita with rocks or slush).

Fri, 23 Feb 2018

14:15 - 15:15
C3

Brownian Motion, Polar Oceans, and the Statistical Physics of Climate

Srikanth Toppaladoddi
(All Souls College)
Abstract

In this talk, I show how concepts from non-equilibrium statistical physics can be employed in the study of climate. The specific problem addressed is the geophysical-scale evolution of Arctic sea ice. Using an analogy with Brownian motion, the original evolution equation for the sea ice thickness distribution function by Thorndike et al. (J. Geophys. Res. 80(33), pp. 4501 — 4513, 1975) is transformed to a Fokker-Planck-like conservation law. The steady solution is $g(h) = {\cal N}(q) h^q \mathrm{e}^{-~ h/H}$, where $q$ and $H$ are expressible in terms of moments over the transition probabilities between thickness categories. The solution exhibits the functional form used in observational fits and shows that for $h \ll 1$, $g(h)$ is controlled by both thermodynamics and mechanics, whereas for $h \gg 1$ only mechanics controls $g(h)$. We also derive the underlying Langevin equation governing the dynamics of the ice thickness $h$, from which we predict the observed $g(h)$. Further, seasonality is introduced by using the Eisenman-Wettlaufer model (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, pp. 28-32, 2009) for the thermal growth of sea ice. The time-dependent problem is studied by numerically integrating the Fokker-Planck equation. The results obtained from these numerical integrations and their comparison with satellite observations are discussed.

Fri, 09 Feb 2018

14:15 - 15:15
C3

Modelling wells in oil reservoir simulation

Jonathan Holmes
(ex Schlumberger)
Abstract

Numerical simulation provides an important contribution to the management of oil reservoirs, and the ‘reservoir simulator’ has been an essential tool for reservoir engineers since the 1970’s. I will describe the role of the ‘well model’ in reservoir simulation. Its main purpose is to determine the production and injection flows of the reservoir fluids at the surface under a variety of operating constraints, and to supply source and sink terms to the grid cells of the reservoir model.

 

Advances in well technology (horizontal, multilateral, and smart wells containing flow control devices) have imposed additional demands on the well model. It must allow the fluid mixture properties to vary with position in the well, and enable different fluid streams to comingle. Friction may make an important contribution to the local pressure gradient. To provide an improved representation of the physics of fluid flow, the well is discretised into a network of segments, where each segment has its own set of variables describing the multiphase flow conditions. Individual segments can be configured to represent flow control devices, accessing lookup tables or built-in correlations to determine the pressure drop across the device as a function of the flow conditions.

 

The ability to couple the wells to a production facility model such as a pipeline network is a crucial advantage for field development and optimization studies, particularly for offshore fields. I will conclude by comparing two techniques for combining a network model with the reservoir simulation. One method is to extend the simulator’s well model to include the network, providing a fully integrated reservoir/well/network simulation. The other method is to run the reservoir and facility models as separate simulations coupled by a ‘controller’, which periodically balances them by exchanging boundary conditions. The latter approach allows the engineer to use a choice of specialist facility simulators.

Fri, 26 Jan 2018

14:15 - 15:15
C3

Obligate Mutualism

Roger Cropp
(Griffith University Australia)
Abstract

In contemporary ecology and mathematical biology undergraduate courses, textbooks focus on competition and predation models despite it being accepted that most species on Earth are involved in mutualist relationships. Mutualism is usually discussed more briefly in texts, often from an observational perspective, and obligate mutualism mostly not at all. Part of the reason for this is the lack of a simple math model to successfully explain the observations. Traditionally, particular nonlinearities  are used, which produce a variety of apparently disparate models.

The failure of the traditional linear model to describe coexisting mutualists has been documented from May (1973) through Murray (2001) to Bronstein (2015). Here we argue that this could be because of the use of carrying capacity, and propose the use of a nutrient pool instead, which implies the need for an autotroph (e.g. a plant) that converts nutrients into living resources for higher trophic levels. We show that such a linear model can successfully explain the major features of obligate mutualism when simple expressions for obligated growth are included.

Oxford Mathematician Soumya Banerjee talks about his current work in progress.

"On warm summer days, fireflies mesmerise us with their glowing lights. They produce this cold light using a light-emitting molecule, the luciferin, and a complementary enzyme, luciferase. This process is known as bioluminescence.

A Search for Neutrino Emission from Fast Radio Bursts with Six Years of IceCube Data
Aartsen, M Ackermann, M Adams, J Aguilar, J Ahlers, M Ahrens, M Al Samarai, I Altmann, D Andeen, K Anderson, T Ansseau, I Anton, G Arguelles, C Auffenberg, J Axani, S Bagherpour, H Bai, X Barron, J Barwick, S Baum, V Bay, R Beatty, J Tjus, J Becker, K BenZvi, S Berley, D Bernardini, E Besson, D Binder, G Bindig, D Blaufuss, E Blot, S Bohm, C Boerner, M Bos, F Boeser, S Botner, O Bourbeau, E Bourbeau, J Bradascio, F Braun, J Brenzke, M Bretz, H Bron, S Brostean-Kaiser, J Burgman, A Busse, R Carver, T Cheung, E Chirkin, D Christov, A Clark, K Classen, L Collins, G Conrad, J Coppin, P Correa, P Cowen, D Cross, R Dave, P Day, M de Andre, J De Clercq, C DeLaunay, J Dembinski, H De Ridder, S Desiati, P de Vries, K de Wasseige, G de With, M DeYoung, T Diaz-Velez, J di Lorenzo, V Dujmovic, H Dumm, J Dunkman, M Dvorak, E Eberhardt, B Ehrhardt, T Eichmann, B Eller, P Evenson, P Fahey, S Fazely, A Felde, J Filimonov, K Finley, C Flis, S Franckowiak, A Friedman, E Fritz, A Gaisser, T Gallagher, J Gerhardt, L Ghorbani, K Giang, W Glauch, T Gluesenkamp, T Goldschmidt, A Gonzalez, J Grant, D Griffith, Z Haack, C Hallgren, A Halzen, F Hanson, K Hebecker, D Heereman, D Helbing, K Hellauer, R Hickford, S Hignight, J Hill, G Hoffman, K Hoffmann, R Hoinka, T Hokanson-Fasig, B Hoshina, K Huang, F Huber, M Hultqvist, K Huennefele, M Hussain, R In, S Iovine, N Ishihara, A Jacobi, E Japaridze, G Jeong, M Jero, K Jones, B Kalaczynski, P Kang, W Kappes, A Kappesser, D Karg, T Karle, A Katz, U Kauer, M Keivani, A Kelley, J Kheirandish, A Kim, J Kim, M Kintscher, T Kiryluk, J Kittler, T Klein, S Koirala, R Kolanoski, H Koepke, L Kopper, C Kopper, S Koschinsky, J Koskinen, D Kowalski, M Krings, K Kroll, M Krueckl, G Kunwar, S Kurahashi, N Kuwabara, T Kyriacou, A Labare, M Lanfranchi, J Larson, M Lauber, F Leonard, K Lesiak-Bzdak, M Leuermann, M Liu, Q Mariscal, C Lu, L Luenemann, J Luszczak, W Madsen, J Maggi, G Mahn, K Mancina, S Maruyama, R Mase, K Maunu, R Meagher, K Medici, M Meier, M Menne, T Merino, G Meures, T Miarecki, S Micallef, J Momente, G Montaruli, T Moore, R Moulai, M Nahnhauer, R Nakarmi, P Naumann, U Neer, G Niederhausen, H Nowicki, S Nygren, D Pollmann, A Olivas, A O'Murchadha, A O'Sullivan, E Palczewski, T Pandya, H Pankova, D Peiffer, P Pepper, J de los Heros, C Pieloth, D Pinat, E Plum, M Price, P Przybylski, G Raab, C Raedel, L Rameez, M Rauch, L Rawlins, K Rea, I Reimann, R Relethford, B Relich, M Resconi, E Rhode, W Richman, M Robertson, S Rongen, M Rott, C Ruhe, T Ryckbosch, D Rysewyk, D Safa, I Saelzer, T Herrera, S Sandrock, A Sandroos, J Santander, M Sarkar, S Satalecka, K Schlunder, P Schmidt, T Schneider, A Schoenen, S Schoenberg, S Schumacher, L Sclafani, S Seckel, D Seunarine, S Soedingrekso, J Soldin, D Song, M Spiczak, G Spiering, C Stachurska, J Stamatikos, M Stanev, T Stasik, A Stein, R Stettner, J Steuer, A Stezelberger, T Stokstad, R Stossl, A Strotjohann, N Stuttard, T Sullivan, G Sutherland, M Taboada, I Tatar, J Tenholt, F Ter-Antonyan, S Terliuk, A Tilav, S Toale, P Tobin, M Toennis, C Toscano, S Tosi, D Tselengidou, M Tung, C Turcati, A Turley, C Ty, B Unger, E Usner, M Vandenbroucke, J Van Driessche, W van Eijk, D van Eijndhoven, N Vanheule, S van Santen, J Vogel, E Vraeghe, M Walck, C Wallace, A Wallraff, M Wandler, F Wandkowsky, N Waza, A Weaver, C Weiss, M Wendt, C Werthebach, J Westerhoff, S Whelan, B Wiebe, K Wiebusch, C Wille, L Williams, D Wills, L Wolf, M Wood, J Wood, T Woolsey, E Woschnagg, K Xu, D Xu, X Xu, Y Yanez, J Yodh, G Yoshida, S Yuan, T Collaboration, I Astrophysical Journal volume 857 issue 2 (20 Apr 2018) http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000430745400007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=4fd6f7d59a501f9b8bac2be37914c43e
Subscribe to