Fri, 09 Feb 2018

14:15 - 15:15
C3

Modelling wells in oil reservoir simulation

Jonathan Holmes
(ex Schlumberger)
Abstract

Numerical simulation provides an important contribution to the management of oil reservoirs, and the ‘reservoir simulator’ has been an essential tool for reservoir engineers since the 1970’s. I will describe the role of the ‘well model’ in reservoir simulation. Its main purpose is to determine the production and injection flows of the reservoir fluids at the surface under a variety of operating constraints, and to supply source and sink terms to the grid cells of the reservoir model.

 

Advances in well technology (horizontal, multilateral, and smart wells containing flow control devices) have imposed additional demands on the well model. It must allow the fluid mixture properties to vary with position in the well, and enable different fluid streams to comingle. Friction may make an important contribution to the local pressure gradient. To provide an improved representation of the physics of fluid flow, the well is discretised into a network of segments, where each segment has its own set of variables describing the multiphase flow conditions. Individual segments can be configured to represent flow control devices, accessing lookup tables or built-in correlations to determine the pressure drop across the device as a function of the flow conditions.

 

The ability to couple the wells to a production facility model such as a pipeline network is a crucial advantage for field development and optimization studies, particularly for offshore fields. I will conclude by comparing two techniques for combining a network model with the reservoir simulation. One method is to extend the simulator’s well model to include the network, providing a fully integrated reservoir/well/network simulation. The other method is to run the reservoir and facility models as separate simulations coupled by a ‘controller’, which periodically balances them by exchanging boundary conditions. The latter approach allows the engineer to use a choice of specialist facility simulators.

Fri, 26 Jan 2018

14:15 - 15:15
C3

Obligate Mutualism

Roger Cropp
(Griffith University Australia)
Abstract

In contemporary ecology and mathematical biology undergraduate courses, textbooks focus on competition and predation models despite it being accepted that most species on Earth are involved in mutualist relationships. Mutualism is usually discussed more briefly in texts, often from an observational perspective, and obligate mutualism mostly not at all. Part of the reason for this is the lack of a simple math model to successfully explain the observations. Traditionally, particular nonlinearities  are used, which produce a variety of apparently disparate models.

The failure of the traditional linear model to describe coexisting mutualists has been documented from May (1973) through Murray (2001) to Bronstein (2015). Here we argue that this could be because of the use of carrying capacity, and propose the use of a nutrient pool instead, which implies the need for an autotroph (e.g. a plant) that converts nutrients into living resources for higher trophic levels. We show that such a linear model can successfully explain the major features of obligate mutualism when simple expressions for obligated growth are included.

Oxford Mathematician Soumya Banerjee talks about his current work in progress.

"On warm summer days, fireflies mesmerise us with their glowing lights. They produce this cold light using a light-emitting molecule, the luciferin, and a complementary enzyme, luciferase. This process is known as bioluminescence.

A Search for Neutrino Emission from Fast Radio Bursts with Six Years of IceCube Data
Aartsen, M Ackermann, M Adams, J Aguilar, J Ahlers, M Ahrens, M Al Samarai, I Altmann, D Andeen, K Anderson, T Ansseau, I Anton, G Arguelles, C Auffenberg, J Axani, S Bagherpour, H Bai, X Barron, J Barwick, S Baum, V Bay, R Beatty, J Tjus, J Becker, K BenZvi, S Berley, D Bernardini, E Besson, D Binder, G Bindig, D Blaufuss, E Blot, S Bohm, C Boerner, M Bos, F Boeser, S Botner, O Bourbeau, E Bourbeau, J Bradascio, F Braun, J Brenzke, M Bretz, H Bron, S Brostean-Kaiser, J Burgman, A Busse, R Carver, T Cheung, E Chirkin, D Christov, A Clark, K Classen, L Collins, G Conrad, J Coppin, P Correa, P Cowen, D Cross, R Dave, P Day, M de Andre, J De Clercq, C DeLaunay, J Dembinski, H De Ridder, S Desiati, P de Vries, K de Wasseige, G de With, M DeYoung, T Diaz-Velez, J di Lorenzo, V Dujmovic, H Dumm, J Dunkman, M Dvorak, E Eberhardt, B Ehrhardt, T Eichmann, B Eller, P Evenson, P Fahey, S Fazely, A Felde, J Filimonov, K Finley, C Flis, S Franckowiak, A Friedman, E Fritz, A Gaisser, T Gallagher, J Gerhardt, L Ghorbani, K Giang, W Glauch, T Gluesenkamp, T Goldschmidt, A Gonzalez, J Grant, D Griffith, Z Haack, C Hallgren, A Halzen, F Hanson, K Hebecker, D Heereman, D Helbing, K Hellauer, R Hickford, S Hignight, J Hill, G Hoffman, K Hoffmann, R Hoinka, T Hokanson-Fasig, B Hoshina, K Huang, F Huber, M Hultqvist, K Huennefele, M Hussain, R In, S Iovine, N Ishihara, A Jacobi, E Japaridze, G Jeong, M Jero, K Jones, B Kalaczynski, P Kang, W Kappes, A Kappesser, D Karg, T Karle, A Katz, U Kauer, M Keivani, A Kelley, J Kheirandish, A Kim, J Kim, M Kintscher, T Kiryluk, J Kittler, T Klein, S Koirala, R Kolanoski, H Koepke, L Kopper, C Kopper, S Koschinsky, J Koskinen, D Kowalski, M Krings, K Kroll, M Krueckl, G Kunwar, S Kurahashi, N Kuwabara, T Kyriacou, A Labare, M Lanfranchi, J Larson, M Lauber, F Leonard, K Lesiak-Bzdak, M Leuermann, M Liu, Q Mariscal, C Lu, L Luenemann, J Luszczak, W Madsen, J Maggi, G Mahn, K Mancina, S Maruyama, R Mase, K Maunu, R Meagher, K Medici, M Meier, M Menne, T Merino, G Meures, T Miarecki, S Micallef, J Momente, G Montaruli, T Moore, R Moulai, M Nahnhauer, R Nakarmi, P Naumann, U Neer, G Niederhausen, H Nowicki, S Nygren, D Pollmann, A Olivas, A O'Murchadha, A O'Sullivan, E Palczewski, T Pandya, H Pankova, D Peiffer, P Pepper, J de los Heros, C Pieloth, D Pinat, E Plum, M Price, P Przybylski, G Raab, C Raedel, L Rameez, M Rauch, L Rawlins, K Rea, I Reimann, R Relethford, B Relich, M Resconi, E Rhode, W Richman, M Robertson, S Rongen, M Rott, C Ruhe, T Ryckbosch, D Rysewyk, D Safa, I Saelzer, T Herrera, S Sandrock, A Sandroos, J Santander, M Sarkar, S Satalecka, K Schlunder, P Schmidt, T Schneider, A Schoenen, S Schoenberg, S Schumacher, L Sclafani, S Seckel, D Seunarine, S Soedingrekso, J Soldin, D Song, M Spiczak, G Spiering, C Stachurska, J Stamatikos, M Stanev, T Stasik, A Stein, R Stettner, J Steuer, A Stezelberger, T Stokstad, R Stossl, A Strotjohann, N Stuttard, T Sullivan, G Sutherland, M Taboada, I Tatar, J Tenholt, F Ter-Antonyan, S Terliuk, A Tilav, S Toale, P Tobin, M Toennis, C Toscano, S Tosi, D Tselengidou, M Tung, C Turcati, A Turley, C Ty, B Unger, E Usner, M Vandenbroucke, J Van Driessche, W van Eijk, D van Eijndhoven, N Vanheule, S van Santen, J Vogel, E Vraeghe, M Walck, C Wallace, A Wallraff, M Wandler, F Wandkowsky, N Waza, A Weaver, C Weiss, M Wendt, C Werthebach, J Westerhoff, S Whelan, B Wiebe, K Wiebusch, C Wille, L Williams, D Wills, L Wolf, M Wood, J Wood, T Woolsey, E Woschnagg, K Xu, D Xu, X Xu, Y Yanez, J Yodh, G Yoshida, S Yuan, T Collaboration, I Astrophysical Journal volume 857 issue 2 (20 Apr 2018) http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000430745400007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=4fd6f7d59a501f9b8bac2be37914c43e
Thu, 22 Feb 2018
16:00
L6

Potential modularity of abelian surfaces

Toby Gee
(Imperial College, London)
Abstract

I will give a gentle introduction to joint work in progress with George Boxer, Frank Calegari, and Vincent Pilloni, in which we prove that all abelian surfaces over totally real fields are potentially modular. We also prove that infinitely many abelian surfaces over Q are modular.

Mon, 15 Jan 2018

13:00 - 17:00
L1

Abel in Oxford - Lectures by Abel Prize winners and members of the Abel Prize Committee

Andrew Wiles, Irene Fonseca, John Rognes
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Timetable:

1.00pm: Introductory Remarks by Camilla Serck-Hanssen, the Vice President of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters

1.10pm - 2.10pm: Andrew Wiles

2.10pm - 2.30pm: Break

2.30pm - 3.30pm: Irene Fonseca

3.30pm - 4.00pm: Tea and Coffee

4.00pm - 5.00pm: John Rognes

Abstracts:

Andrew Wiles: Points on elliptic curves, problems and progress

This will be a survey of the problems concerned with counting points on elliptic curves.

-------

Irene Fonseca: Mathematical Analysis of Novel Advanced Materials

Quantum dots are man-made nanocrystals of semiconducting materials. Their formation and assembly patterns play a central role in nanotechnology, and in particular in the optoelectronic properties of semiconductors. Changing the dots' size and shape gives rise to many applications that permeate our daily lives, such as the new Samsung QLED TV monitor that uses quantum dots to turn "light into perfect color"! 

Quantum dots are obtained via the deposition of a crystalline overlayer (epitaxial film) on a crystalline substrate. When the thickness of the film reaches a critical value, the profile of the film becomes corrugated and islands (quantum dots) form. As the creation of quantum dots evolves with time, materials defects appear. Their modeling is of great interest in materials science since material properties, including rigidity and conductivity, can be strongly influenced by the presence of defects such as dislocations. 

In this talk we will use methods from the calculus of variations and partial differential equations to model and mathematically analyze the onset of quantum dots, the regularity and evolution of their shapes, and the nucleation and motion of dislocations.

-------

John Rognes: Symmetries of Manifolds

To describe the possible rotations of a ball of ice, three real numbers suffice.  If the ice melts, infinitely many numbers are needed to describe the possible motions of the resulting ball of water.  We discuss the shape of the resulting spaces of continuous, piecewise-linear or differentiable symmetries of spheres, balls and higher-dimensional manifolds.  In the high-dimensional cases the answer turns out to involve surgery theory and algebraic K-theory.

Thu, 01 Mar 2018
12:00
L3

Potentials for A-quasiconvexity

Bogdan Raita
(Oxford University)
Abstract

Many problems arising in Physics can be posed as minimisation of energy functionals under linear partial differential constraints. For example, a prototypical example in the Calculus of Variations is given by functionals defined on curl-free fields, i.e., gradients. Most work done subject to more general constraints met significant difficulty due to the lack of associated potentials. We show that under the constant rank assumption, which holds true of almost all examples of constraints investigated in connection with lower-semicontinuity, linear constraints admit a potential in frequency space. As a consequence, the notion of A-quasiconvexity, which involves testing with periodic fields leading to difficulties in establishing sufficiency for weak sequential lower semi-continuity, can be tested against compactly supported fields. We will indicate how this can simplify the general framework.

Thu, 22 Feb 2018
12:00
L3

Stability of toroidal nematics

Epifanio Virga
(Università di Pavia)
Abstract

When nematic liquid crystal droplets are produced in the form or tori (or such is the shapes of confining cavities), they may be called toroidal nematics, for short. When subject to degenerate planar anchoring on the boundary of a torus, the nematic director acquires a natural equilibrium configuration within the torus, irrespective of the values of Frank's elastic constants. That is the pure bend arrangement whose integral lines run along the parallels of all inner deflated tori. This lecture is concerned with the stability of such a universal equilibrium configuration. Whenever its stability is lost, new equilibrium configurations arise in pairs, the members of which are symmetric and exhibit opposite chirality. Previous work has shown that a rescaled saddle-splay constant may be held responsible for such a chiral symmetry breaking. We shall show that that is not the only possible instability mechanism and, perhaps more importantly, we shall attempt to describe the qualitative properties of the equilibrium nematic textures that prevail when the chiral symmetry is broken.

Thu, 08 Feb 2018
15:00
L4

Non-existence and Non-uniqueness in the Kinetic Theory of Non-spherical Particles

Mark Wilkinson
(Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh)
Abstract

The Boltzmann equation is a well-studied PDE that describes the statistical evolution of a dilute gas of spherical particles. However, much less is known — both from the physical and mathematical viewpoints — about the Boltzmann equation for non-spherical particles. In this talk, we present some new results on the non-existence and non-uniqueness of weak solutions to the initial-boundary value problem for N non-spherical particles which have importance for the Boltzmann equation.

We present work which was done jointly with L. Saint-Raymond (ENS Lyon), and also with P. Palffy-Muhoray (Kent State), E. Virga (Pavia) and X. Zheng (Kent State).

Thu, 18 Jan 2018
12:00
L5

Nonlinear cross-diffusion systems and gradient flows

Maria Bruna
(Oxford University)
Abstract

We will discuss nonlinear cross-diffusion models describing cell motility of two distinct populations. The continuum PDE model is derived systematically from a stochastic discrete model consisting of impenetrable diffusing spheres. In this talk, I will outline the derivation of the cross-diffusion model, discuss some of its features such as the gradient-flow structure, and show numerical results comparing the discrete stochastic system to the derived model.

Subscribe to