When do two quantum field theories describe the same physics? I will discuss some approaches to this question in the context of superconformal field theories in four and six dimensions. First, I will discuss the construction of 6d (1,0) SCFTs from the perspective of the "atomic classification", focussing on an oft-overlooked subtlety whereby distinct SCFTs in fact share an effective description on the generic point of the tensor branch. We will see how to determine the difference in the Higgs branch operator spectrum from the atomic perspective, and how that agrees with a dual class S perspective. I will explain how other 4d N=2 SCFTs, which a priori look like distinct theories, can be shown to describe the same physics, as they arise as torus-compactifications of identical 6d theories.

A 2d SCFT given as a non-linear sigma model of a Ricci-flat Kahler target 

space is not a rational CFT in general; only special points in the moduli 

space of the target-space metric, the 2d SCFTs are rational. 

Gukov-Vafa's paper in 2002 hinted at a possibility that such special points 

may be characterized by the property "complex multiplication" of the target space, 

which has its origin in number theory. We revisit the idea, refine the Conjecture, 

and prove it in the case the target space is T^4. 
 

This presentation is based on arXiv:2205.10299 and 2212.13028 .

I shall discuss my recent work showing that the Bogomolov-Tschinkel universality conjecture holds if and only if the mapping class groups of a punctured surface is large. One consequence of this result is that all genus 2 surface-by-surface (and all genus 2 surface-by-free) groups are virtually algebraically fibered. Moreover, I will explain why simple curve homology does not always generate homology of finite covers of closed surface. I will also mention my work with O. Tosic regarding the Putman-Wieland conjecture, and explain the partial solution to the Prill's problem about algebraic curves.

 

The chromatic polynomial \chi(Q) can be defined for any graph, such that for Q integer it counts the number of colourings. It has many remarkable properties, and I describe several that are derived easily by using fusion categories, familiar from topological quantum field theory. In particular, I define the chromatic algebra, a planar algebra whose evaluation gives the chromatic polynomial. Linear identities of the chromatic polynomial at certain values of Q then follow from the Jones-Wenzl projector of the associated category. An unusual non-linear one called Tutte's golden identity relates \chi(\phi+2) for planar triangulations to the square of \chi(\phi+1), where \phi is the golden mean. Tutte's original proof is purely combinatorial. I will give here an elementary proof by manipulations of a topological invariant related to the Jones polynomial. Time permitting, I will also mention analogous identities for graphs on more general surfaces. Based on work with Slava Krushkal.