Mon, 27 Jan 2020
12:45
L3

The Attractor Mechanism and the Arithmetic of Calabi-Yau Manifolds

Philip Candelas
(Oxford)
Abstract

In the process of studying the zeta-function for one parameter families of Calabi-Yau manifolds we have been led to a manifold, for which the quartic numerator of the zeta-function factorises into two quadrics remarkably often. Among these factorisations, we find persistent factorisations; these are determined by a parameter that satisfies an algebraic equation with coefficients in Q, so independent of any particular prime.  We note that these factorisations are due a splitting of Hodge structure and that these special values of the parameter are rank two attractor points in the sense of IIB supergravity. To our knowledge, these points provide the first explicit examples of non-singular, non-rigid rank two attractor points for Calabi-Yau manifolds of full SU(3) holonomy. Modular groups and modular forms arise in relation to these attractor points in a way that, to a physicist, is unexpected. This is a report on joint work with Xenia de la Ossa, Mohamed Elmi and Duco van Straten.

 

 

Mon, 27 Jan 2020

16:00 - 17:00
C1

The Class Field Tower Problem

Wojtek Wawrów
(Oxford)
Abstract

Given a number field K, it is natural to ask whether it has a finite extension with ideal class number one. This question can be translated into a fundamental question in class field theory, namely the class field tower problem. In this talk, we are going to discuss this problem as well as its solution due to Golod and Shafarevich using methods of group cohomology.
 

Tue, 25 Feb 2020
12:00
L4

Uniqueness & non-uniqueness results for wave equations

Jan Sbierski
(Oxford)
Abstract

A well-known theorem of Choquet-Bruhat and Geroch states that for given smooth initial data for the Einstein equations there exists a unique maximal globally hyperbolic development. In particular, time evolution of globally hyperbolic solutions is unique. This talk investigates whether the same result holds for quasilinear wave equations defined on a fixed background. After recalling the notion of global hyperbolicity, we first present an example of a quasilinear wave equation for which unique time evolution in fact fails and contrast this with the Einstein equations. We then proceed by presenting conditions on quasilinear wave equations which ensure uniqueness. This talk is based on joint work with Harvey Reall and Felicity Eperon.
 

Tue, 10 Mar 2020
14:00
L2

Motion correction methods for undersampled 3D imaging

Joseph Field
(Oxford)
Abstract

Reconstruction of 3D images from a set of 2D X-ray projections is a standard inverse problem, particularly in medical imaging. Improvements in imaging technologies have enabled the development of a flat-panel X-ray source, comprised of an array of low-power emitters that are fired in quick succession. During a complete firing sequence, there may be shifts in the patient’s resting position which ultimately create artifacts in the final reconstruction. We present a method for correcting images with respect to unknown body motion, focusing on the case of simple rigid body motion. Image reconstructions are obtained by solving a sparse linear inverse problem, with respect to not only the underlying body but also the unknown velocity. Results find that reconstructions of a moving body can be much better than those obtained by measuring a stationary body, as long as the underlying motion is well approximated.

Tue, 03 Mar 2020
14:30
L2

Stochastic rounding: effect on linear algebra operations and application to time-dependent PDEs

Matteo Croci
(Oxford)
Abstract

The standard rounding procedure in floating-point computations is round to nearest (RN). In this talk we consider an alternative rounding strategy called stochastic rounding (SR) which has the appealing property of being exact (actually exact!) in expectation. In the first part of the talk we discuss recent developments in probabilistic rounding error analysis and we show how rounding errors grow at an O(\sqrt{n}) rate rather than O(n) when SR is employed. This shows that Wilkinson's rule of thumb provably holds for this type of rounding. In the second part of the talk we consider the application of SR to parabolic PDEs admitting a steady state solution. We show that when the heat equation is solved in half precision RN fails to compute an accurate solution, while SR successfully solves the problem to decent accuracy.
 

Tue, 03 Mar 2020
14:00
L2

Deterministic Dynamic Pricing via Iterative Quadratic Programming

Jari Fowkes
(Oxford)
Abstract

We consider the problem of dynamically pricing multiple products on a network of resources, such as that faced by an airline selling tickets on its route network. For computational reasons this inherently stochastic problem is often approximated deterministically, however even the deterministic dynamic pricing problem can be impractical to solve. For this reason we have derived a novel iterative Quadratic Programming approximation to the deterministic dynamic pricing problem that is not only very fast to solve in practice but also exhibits a provably linear rate of convergence. This is joint work with Saksham Jain and Raphael Hauser.
 

Tue, 25 Feb 2020
14:00
L2

Fast and stable randomized low-rank matrix approximation

Yuji Nakatsukasa
(Oxford)
Abstract

Randomized SVD has become an extremely successful approach for efficiently computing a low-rank approximation of matrices. In particular the paper by Halko, Martinsson (who is speaking twice this week), and Tropp (SIREV 2011) contains extensive analysis, and made it a very popular method. 
The complexity for $m\times n$ matrices is $O(Nr+(m+n)r^2)$ where $N$ is the cost of a (fast) matrix-vector multiplication; which becomes $O(mn\log n+(m+n)r^2)$ for dense matrices. This work uses classical results in numerical linear algebra to reduce the computational cost to $O(Nr)$ without sacrificing numerical stability. The cost is essentially optimal for many classes of matrices, including $O(mn\log n)$ for dense matrices. The method can also be adapted for updating, downdating and perturbing the matrix, and is especially efficient relative to previous algorithms for such purposes.  

 

Tue, 25 Feb 2020
14:30
L2

Low-rank plus sparse matrices: ill-posedness and guaranteed recovery

Simon Vary
(Oxford)
Abstract

Robust principal component analysis and low-rank matrix completion are extensions of PCA that allow for outliers and missing entries, respectively. Solving these problems requires a low coherence between the low-rank matrix and the canonical basis. However, in both problems the well-posedness issue is even more fundamental; in some cases, both Robust PCA and matrix completion can fail to have any solutions due to the fact that the set of low-rank plus sparse matrices is not closed. Another consequence of this fact is that the lower restricted isometry property (RIP) bound cannot be satisfied for some low-rank plus sparse matrices unless further restrictions are imposed on the constituents. By restricting the energy of one of the components, we close the set and are able to derive the RIP over the set of low rank plus sparse matrices and operators satisfying concentration of measure inequalities. We show that the RIP of an operator implies exact recovery of a low-rank plus sparse matrix is possible with computationally tractable algorithms such as convex relaxations or line-search methods. We propose two efficient iterative methods called Normalized Iterative Hard Thresholding (NIHT) and Normalized Alternative Hard Thresholding (NAHT) that provably recover a low-rank plus sparse matrix from subsampled measurements taken by an operator satisfying the RIP.
 

Subscribe to Oxford