L1

In this interactive workshop, we'll discuss what mathematicians are looking for in written solutions.  How can you set out your ideas clearly, and what are the standard mathematical conventions?  Please bring a pen or pencil! 

This session is likely to be most relevant for first-year undergraduates, but all are welcome.

What should you expect in intercollegiate classes?  What can you do to get the most out of them?  In this session, experienced class tutors will share their thoughts, and a current student will offer tips and advice based on their experience.  

All undergraduate and masters students welcome, especially Part B and MSc students attending intercollegiate classes. (Students who attended the Part C/OMMS induction event will find significant overlap between the advice offered there and this session!)

Dr Rachel Philip will discuss her experiences working at the interface between academic mathematics and industry. Oxford University Innovation will discuss how they can help academics when interacting with industry. 

Speaker: Daniel Woodhouse (North)
Title: Generalizing Leighton's Graph Covering Theorem
Abstract: Before he ran off and became a multimillionaire, exploiting his knowledge of network optimisation, the computer scientist F. Thomas Leighton proved an innocuous looking result about finite graphs. The result states that any pair of finite graphs with isomorphic universal covers have isomorphic finite covers. I will explain what all this means, and why this should be of tremendous interest to group theorists and topologists.

Speaker: Benjamin Fehrman (South)
Title: Large deviations for particle processes and stochastic PDE
Abstract: In this talk, we will introduce the theory of large deviations through a simple example based on flipping a coin.  We will then define the zero range particle process, and show that its diffusive scaling limit solves a nonlinear diffusion equation.  The large deviations of the particle process about its scaling limit formally coincide with the large deviations of a certain ill-posed, singular stochastic PDE.  We will explain in what sense this relationship has been made mathematically precise.

Speaker: Joseph Keir (North)
Title: Dispersion (or not) in nonlinear wave equations
Abstract: Wave equations are ubiquitous in physics, playing central roles in fields as diverse as fluid dynamics, electromagnetism and general relativity. In many cases of these wave equations are nonlinear, and consequently can exhibit dramatically different behaviour when their solutions become large. Interestingly, they can also exhibit differences when given arbitrarily small initial data: in some cases, the nonlinearities drive solutions to grow larger and even to blow up in a finite time, while in other cases solutions disperse just like the linear case. The precise conditions on the nonlinearity which discriminate between these two cases are unknown, but in this talk I will present a conjecture regarding where this border lies, along with some conditions which are sufficient to guarantee dispersion.

Speaker: Priya Subramanian (South)
Title: What happens when an applied mathematician uses algebraic geometry?
Abstract: A regular situation that an applied mathematician faces is to obtain the equilibria of a set of differential equations that govern a system of interest. A number of techniques can help at this point to simplify the equations, which reduce the problem to that of finding equilibria of coupled polynomial equations. I want to talk about how homotopy methods developed in computational algebraic geometry can solve for all solutions of coupled polynomial equations non-iteratively using an example pattern forming system. Finally, I will end with some thoughts on what other 'nails' we might use this new shiny hammer on.

Dominic Vella will talk about writing grants, Anna Seigal will talk about writing research fellow applications and Jason Lotay will talk about his experience and tips for applying for faculty positions. 

We consider estimation of ordinary differential equation (ODE) models from noisy observations. For this problem, one conventional approach is to fit numerical solutions (e.g., Euler, Runge–Kutta) of ODEs to data. However, such a method does not account for the discretization error in numerical solutions and has limited estimation accuracy. In this study, we develop an estimation method that quantifies the discretization error based on data. The key idea is to model the discretization error as random variables and estimate their variance simultaneously with the ODE parameter. The proposed method has the form of iteratively reweighted least squares, where the discretization error variance is updated with the isotonic regression algorithm and the ODE parameter is updated by solving a weighted least squares problem using the adjoint system. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method improves estimation accuracy by accounting for the discretization error in a data-driven manner. This is a joint work with Yuto Miyatake (Osaka University).

A mechanism is described to symmetrize the ultraspherical spectral method for self-adjoint problems. The resulting discretizations are symmetric and banded. An algorithm is presented for an adaptive spectral decomposition of self-adjoint operators. Several applications are explored to demonstrate the properties of the symmetrizer and the adaptive spectral decomposition.

Please register at:

https://sites.google.com/view/geometryandstrings2019/home