L3

Results of Bourgain and Kindler-Safra state that if $f$ is a Boolean function on $\{0,1\}^n$, and

the Fourier transform of $f$ is highly concentrated on low frequencies, then $f$ must be close

to a ‘junta’ (a function depending upon a small number of coordinates). This phenomenon is

known as ‘Fourier stability’, and has several interesting consequences in combinatorics,

theoretical computer science and social choice theory. We will describe some of these,

before turning to the analogous question for Boolean functions on the symmetric group. Here,

genuine stability does not occur; it is replaced by a weaker phenomenon, which we call

‘quasi-stability’. We use our 'quasi-stability' result to prove an isoperimetric inequality

for $S_n$ which is sharp for sets of size $(n-t)!$, when $n$ is large. Several open questions

remain. Joint work with Yuval Filmus (University of Toronto) and Ehud Friedgut (Weizmann

Institute).

A self-avoiding walk on a lattice is a walk that never visits the same vertex twice.  Self-avoiding walks (SAW) have attracted interest for decades, first in statistical physics, where they are considered as polymer models, and then in combinatorics and in probability theory (the first mathematical contributions are probably due to John Hammersley, from Oxford, in the early sixties). However, their properties remain poorly understood in low dimension, despite the existence of remarkable conjectures.

About two years ago, Duminil-Copin and Smirnov proved an "old" and remarkable conjecture of Nienhuis (1982), according to which the number of SAWs of length n on the honeycomb (hexagonal) lattice grows like mu^n, with mu=sqrt(2 +sqrt(2)).

This beautiful result has woken up the hope to prove other simple looking conjectures involving these objects. I will thus present the proof of a younger conjecture (1995) by Batchelor and Yung, which deals with SAWs confined to a half-plane and interacting with its boundary.

(joint work with N. Beaton, J. de Gier, H. Duminil-Copin and A. Guttmann)

Several recent works by D. Tamarkin, D. Nadler, E. Zaslow make use of the microlocal theory of sheaves of M. Kashiwara and P. Schapira to obtain results in symplectic geometry. The link between sheaves on a manifold $M$ and the symplectic geometry of the cotangent bundle of $M$ is given by the microsupport of a sheaf, which is a conic co-isotropic subset of the cotangent bundle. In the above mentioned works properties of a given Lagrangian submanifold $\Lambda$ are deduced from the existence of a sheaf with microsupport $\Lambda$, which we call a quantization of $\Lambda$.

In the first talk we will see that the graph of a Hamiltonian isotopy admits a canonical quantization and we deduce a new proof of Arnold's non-displaceability conjecture.

A Lagrangian submanifold of a Calabi-Yau manifold is called positive if the real part of the holomorphic volume form restricted to it is positive. A Hamiltonian isotopy class of positive Lagrangian submanifolds admits a Riemannian metric with non-positive curvature. Its universal cover

admits a functional, with critical points special Lagrangians, that is strictly convex with respect to the metric. If time permits, I'll explain

how mirror symmetry relates the metric and functional to the infinite dimensional symplectic reduction picture of Atiyah, Bott, and Donaldson in

the context of the Kobayashi-Hitchin correspondence.

Van der Waerden has shown that `almost' all monic integer

polynomials of degree n have the full symmetric group S_n as Galois group.

The strongest quantitative form of this statement known so far is due to

Gallagher, who made use of the Large Sieve.

In this talk we want to explain how one can use recent

advances on bounding the number of integral points on curves and surfaces

instead of the Large Sieve to go beyond Gallagher's result.

Counter-examples to the Hasse principle are known for many families of geometrically rational varieties. We discuss how often such failures arise for Chatelet surfaces and certain higher-dimensional hypersurfaces. This is joint work with Regis de la Breteche.

I will explain the beautiful generalization recently discovered by Y. Tian of Heegner's original proof of the existence of infinitely many primes of the form 8n+5, which are congruent numbers. At the end, I hope to mention some possible generalizations of his work to other elliptic curves defined over the field of rational numbers.

Toby Gee and I have proposed the definition of a "C-group", an extension of Langlands' notion of an L-group, and argue that for an arithmetic version of Langlands' philosophy such a notion is useful for controlling twists properly. I will give an introduction to this business, and some motivation. I'll start at the beginning by explaining what an L-group is a la Langlands, but if anyone is interested in doing some background preparation for the talk, they might want to find out for themselves what an L-group (a Langlands dual group) is e.g. by looking it up on Wikipedia!