L6

A 3-manifold is a space which locally looks like R^3. A major theme in 3-manifold Topology is to understand and classify 3-manifolds. Given two compact 3-manifolds M_1,M_2 we can form another 3-manifold by taking what’s called the “connect sum” of M_1 and M_2. Under this operation, 3-manifolds can be decomposed uniquely into prime pieces just like the integers can be decomposed uniquely as a product of primes. We will discuss this prime decomposition theorem for 3-manifolds while also giving a wide variety of examples.

Flat space holography, if there really is such a thing, is intimately related to Carrollian geometry. I will give an introduction to Carrollian geometry, and discuss how many Carrollian spaces of interest arise as homogeneous spaces of the Poincaré group. Finally, I will discuss the construction of Cartan geometries modelled on these spaces.

The canonical example of AdS/CFT relates N=4 SYM in 4d to supergravity on AdS5 x S5 by considering a stack of D3-branes. A natural question then emerges: what about considering other Dp-branes? The worldvolume theory is again SYM but is not conformal anymore, while the supergravity dual is now only conformally AdS. Despite these differences, some control remains, and some inspiration from the p=3 case can be sought. In this talk, I will review this setup and discuss the recent results of [2503.18770] and [2503.14685] regarding the computation of correlation functions.

For this JC, I will review the recently much debated puzzles that arise in holographic systems with baby universes. After describing the original set-up of Antonini-Sasieta-Swingle, I will explain the paradox raised by Antonini-Rath, which suggests the existence of a single CFT state that can have two distinct holographic descriptions in the bulk: one with a closed baby universe and one without. I will discuss various proposed resolutions of this puzzle, which may (or may not) require us to rethink the holographic dictionary in AdS/CFT.

I will review an elegant, theory-independent argument that proves the existence of exactly marginal operators in the presence of a conformal manifold. The proof relies on a few technical assumptions, which I will discuss in detail. The rest of the discussion will be phrased in terms of conformal interfaces separating two CFTs on the conformal manifold, which we take as an opportunity to discuss the fundamentals of defect CFTs. The overarching topic into which this result fits is that of proving certain (AdS) swampland conjectures from CFT principles.