Mon, 03 Feb 2020

14:15 - 15:15
L3

Singular time changes, distributional valued Ricci bounds, and gradient estimates for reflected Brownian motion on non-convex domains

THEO STURM
(Bonn University)
Abstract

We derive generalized lower Ricci bounds in terms of signed measures. And we prove associated gradient estimates for the heat flow with Neumann boundary conditions on domains of metric measure spaces obtained through „convexification“ of the domains by means of subtle time changes. This improves upon previous results both in the case of non-convex domains and in the case of convex domains.
 

Mon, 03 Feb 2020

14:15 - 15:15
L4

Homogeneous Einstein metrics on Euclidean spaces are Einstein solvmanifolds

Christoph Bohm
(Münster)
Abstract

We  show that homogeneous Einstein metrics on Euclidean spaces are Einstein solvmanifolds, using that they admit periodic, integrally minimal foliations by homogeneous hypersurfaces. For the geometric flow induced by the orbit-Einstein condition, we construct a Lyapunov function based on curvature estimates which come from real GIT.

Mon, 03 Feb 2020
12:45
L3

IIB flux non-commutativity and the global structure of field theories

Inaki Garcia-Etxebarria
(Durham)
Abstract

I will discuss the origin of the choice of global structure
--- or equivalently, the choice for which higher p-form symmetries are
present in the theory --- for various (Lagrangian and non-Lagrangian)
field theories in terms of their realization in IIB and M-theory. I
will explain how this choice on the field theory side can be traced
back to the fact that fluxes in string/M-theory do not commute in the
presence of torsion. I will illustrate how these ideas provide a
stringy explanation for the fact that six-dimensional (2,0) and (1,0)
theories generically have a partition vector (as opposed to a partition
function) and explain how this reproduces the classification of N=4
theories provided by Aharony, Seiberg and Tachikawa. Time permitting, I
will also explain how to use these ideas to obtain the algebra of
higher p-form symmetries for 5d SCFTs arising from M-theory at
arbitrary isolated toric singularities, and to classify global forms
for various 4d theories in the presence of duality defects.

Fri, 31 Jan 2020

14:00 - 15:00
L1

Applying a mathematician's mindset beyond mathematics

Dr Owen Cotton-Barratt
Abstract

Mathematics has provided us with several extremely useful tools to apply in the world beyond mathematics.  But it also provides us with mathematicians -- individuals who have trained habits of careful thinking in domains where that is the only way to make progress. This talk will explore some other domains -- such as saying sensible things about the long-term future, or how to identify good actions in the world -- where this style of thinking seems particularly desirable as progress can otherwise be elusive or illusory.  It will also consider how a mathematician's curiosity can help to identify important questions.

Fri, 31 Jan 2020

14:00 - 15:00
L6

Numerical simulations of immersed granular collapses with dense and loose initial packings

Yuri Dumaresq Sobral
(Universidade de Brasília (Brazil))
Abstract

The collapse of granular columns in a viscous fluid is a common model case for submarine geophysical flows. In immersed granular collapses, dense packings result in slow dynamics and short runout distances, while loose packings are associated with fast dynamics and long runout distances. However, the underlying mechanisms of the triggering and runout, particularly regarding the complex fluid-particle interactions at the pore-scale, are yet to be fully understood. In this study, a three-dimensional approach coupling the Lattice Boltzmann Method and the Discrete Element Method is adopted to investigate the influence of packing density on the collapsing dynamics. The direct numerical simulation of fluid-particle interactions provides evidence of the pore pressure feedback mechanism. In dense cases, a strong arborescent contact force network can form to prevent particles from sliding, resulting in a creeping failure behavior. In contrast, the granular phase is liquefied substantially in loose cases, leading to a rapid and catastrophic failure. Furthermore, hydroplaning can take place in loose cases due to the fast-moving surge front, which reduces the frictional resistance dramatically and thereby results in a longer runout distance. More quantitatively, we are able to linearly correlate the normalized runout distance and the densimetric Froude number across a wide range of length scales, including small-scale numerical/experimental data and large-scale field data.

Fri, 31 Jan 2020

12:00 - 13:00
L4

Geometric methods on low-rank matrix and tensor manifolds

Bart Vandereycken
(Université de Genève)
Abstract

I will present numerical methods for low-rank matrix and tensor problems that explicitly make use of the geometry of rank constrained matrix and tensor spaces. We focus on two types of problems: The first are optimization problems, like matrix and tensor completion, solving linear systems and eigenvalue problems. Such problems can be solved by numerical optimization for manifolds, called Riemannian optimization methods. We will explain the basic elements of differential geometry in order to apply such methods efficiently to rank constrained matrix and tensor spaces. The second type of problem is ordinary differential equations, defined on matrix and tensor spaces. We show how their solution can be approximated by the dynamical low-rank principle, and discuss several numerical integrators that rely in an essential way on geometric properties that are characteristic to sets of low rank matrices and tensors. Based on joint work with André Uschmajew (MPI MiS Leipzig).

Fri, 31 Jan 2020

11:45 - 13:15
L3

InFoMM CDT Group Meeting

Federico Danieli, Ambrose Yim, Zhen Shao, TBA
(Mathematical Institute)
Fri, 31 Jan 2020

10:00 - 11:00
L3

Fast algorithms for a large-scale multi-agent Travelling Salesman Problem

Michael Ostroumov
(Value Chain Lab)
Abstract

Background: The traditional business models for B2B freight and distribution are struggling with underutilised transport capacities resulting in higher costs, excessive environmental damage and unnecessary congestion. The scale of the problem is captured by the European Environmental Agency: only 63% of journeys carry useful load and the average vehicle utilisation is under 60% (by weight or volume). Decarbonisation of vehicles would address only part of the problem. That is why leading sector researchers estimate that freight collaboration (co-shipment) will deliver a step change improvement in vehicle fill and thus remove unproductive journeys delivering over 20% of cost savings and >25% reduction in environmental footprint. However, these benefits can only be achieved at a scale that involves 100’s of players collaborating at a national or pan-regional level. Such scale and level of complexity creates a massive optimisation challenge that current market solutions are unable to handle (modern route planning solutions optimise deliveries only within the “4 walls” of a single business).

Maths challenge: The mentioned above optimisation challenge could be expressed as an extended version of the TSP, but with multiple optimisation objectives (other than distance). Moreover, besides the scale and multi-agent setup (many shippers, carriers and recipients engaged simultaneously) the model would have to operate a number of variables and constraints, which in addition to the obvious ones also include: time (despatch/delivery dates/slots and journey durations), volume (items to be delivered), transport equipment with respective rate-cards from different carriers, et al. With the possible variability of despatch locations (when clients have multi-warehouse setup) this potentially creates a very-large non-convex optimisation problem that would require development of new, much faster algorithms and approaches. Such algorithm should be capable of finding “local” optimums and subsequently improve them within a very short window i.e. in minutes, which would be required to drive and manage effective inter-company collaboration across many parties involved. We tried a few different approaches eg used Gurobi solver, which even with clustering was still too slow and lacked scalability, only to realise that we need to build such an algorithm in-house.

Ask: We started to investigate other approaches like Simulated Annealing or Gravitational Emulation Local Search but this work is preliminary and new and better ideas are of interest. So in support of our Technical Feasibility study we are looking for support in identification of the best approach and design of the actual algorithm that we’ll use in the development of our Proof of Concept.  

Thu, 30 Jan 2020

17:00 - 18:00
L1

Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture: Henry Segerman - Artistic Mathematics: truth and beauty

Henry Segerman
(Oklahoma State University)
Further Information

This lecture is about mathematical visualization: how to make accurate, effective, and beautiful pictures, models, and experiences of mathematical concepts. What is it that makes a visualization compelling? 

Henry will show examples in the medium of 3D printing, as well as his work in virtual reality and spherical video. He will also discuss his experiences in teaching a project-based class on 3D printing for mathematics students.

Henry Segerman is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics at Oklahoma State University.

Please email @email to register.

Watch live:
https://www.facebook.com/OxfordMathematics/
https://livestream.com/oxuni/Segerman

The Oxford Mathematics Public Lectures are generously supported by XTX Markets.

Thu, 30 Jan 2020
16:00
L5

The p-part of BSD for residually reducible elliptic curves of rank one

Giada Grossi
(UCL)
Abstract

Let E be an elliptic curve over the rationals and p a prime such that E admits a rational p-isogeny satisfying some assumptions. In a joint work with J. Lee and C. Skinner, we prove the anticyclotomic Iwasawa main conjecture for E/K for some suitable quadratic imaginary field K. I will explain our strategy and how this, combined with complex and p-adic Gross-Zagier formulae, allows us to prove that if E has rank one, then the p-part of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer formula for E/Q holds true.
 

Thu, 30 Jan 2020

16:00 - 17:30
L3

Feedback control of falling liquid films

Susana Gomes
(University of Warwick)
Abstract

The flow of a thin film down an inclined plane is an important physical phenomenon appearing in many industrial applications, such as coating (where it is desirable to maintain the fluid interface flat) or heat transfer (where a larger interfacial area is beneficial). These applications lead to the need of reliably manipulating the flow in order to obtain a desired interfacial shape. The interface of such thin films can be described by a number of models, each of them exhibiting instabilities for certain parameter regimes. In this talk, I will propose a feedback control methodology based on same-fluid blowing and suction. I use the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky (KS) equation to model interface perturbations and to derive the controls. I will show that one can use a finite number of point-actuated controls based on observations of the interface to stabilise both the flat solution and any chosen nontrivial solution of the KS equation. Furthermore, I will investigate the robustness of the designed controls to uncertain observations and parameter values, and study the effect of the controls across a hierarchy of models for the interface, which include the KS equation, (nonlinear) long-wave models and the full Navier–Stokes equations.

Thu, 30 Jan 2020

16:00 - 17:00
L4

Collateralized Networks

Samim Ghamami
Abstract

This paper studies the spread of losses and defaults in financial networks with two important features: collateral requirements and alternative contract termination rules in bankruptcy. When collateral is committed to a firm’s counterparties, a solvent firm may default if it lacks sufficient liquid assets to meet its payment obligations. Collateral requirements can thus increase defaults and payment shortfalls. Moreover, one firm may benefit from the failure of another if the failure frees collateral committed by the surviving firm, giving it additional resources to make other payments. Contract termination at default may also improve the ability of other firms to meet their obligations. As a consequence of these features, the timing of payments and collateral liquidation must be carefully specified, and establishing the existence of payments that clear the network becomes more complex. Using this framework, we study the consequences of illiquid collateral for the spread of losses through fire sales; we compare networks with and without selective contract termination; and we analyze the impact of alternative bankruptcy stay rules that limit the seizure of collateral at default. Under an upper bound on derivatives leverage, full termination reduces payment shortfalls compared with selective termination.

Thu, 30 Jan 2020

14:00 - 15:00
L4

Using shared and distributed memory in the solution of large sparse systems

Iain Duff
(Rutherford Appleton Laboratory)
Abstract

We discuss the design of algorithms and codes for the solution of large sparse systems of linear equations on extreme scale computers that are characterized by having many nodes with multi-core CPUs or GPUs. We first use two approaches to get good single node performance. For symmetric systems we use task-based algorithms based on an assembly tree representation of the factorization. We then use runtime systems for scheduling the computation on both multicore CPU nodes and GPU nodes [6]. In this work, we are also concerned with the efficient parallel implementation of the solve phase using the computed sparse factors, and we show impressive results relative to other state-of-the-art codes [3]. Our second approach was to design a new parallel threshold Markowitz algorithm [4] based on Luby’s method [7] for obtaining a maximal independent set in an undirected graph. This is a significant extension since our graph model is a directed graph. We then extend the scope of both these approaches to exploit distributed memory parallelism. In the first case, we base our work on the block Cimmino algorithm [1] using the ABCD software package coded by Zenadi in Toulouse [5, 8]. The kernel for this algorithm is the direct factorization of a symmetric indefinite submatrix for which we use the above symmetric code. To extend the unsymmetric code to distributed memory, we use the Zoltan code from Sandia [2] to partition the matrix to singly bordered block diagonal form and then use the above unsymmetric code on the blocks on the diagonal. In both cases, we illustrate the added parallelism obtained from combining the distributed memory parallelism with the high single-node performance and show that our codes out-perform other state-of-the-art codes. This work is joint with a number of people. We developed the algorithms and codes in an EU Horizon 2020 Project, called NLAFET, that finished on 30 April 2019. Coworkers in this were: Sebastien Cayrols, Jonathan Hogg, Florent Lopez, and Stojce ´ ∗@email 1 Nakov. Collaborators in the block Cimmino part of the project were: Philippe Leleux, Daniel Ruiz, and Sukru Torun. Our codes available on the github repository https://github.com/NLAFET.

References [1] M. ARIOLI, I. S. DUFF, J. NOAILLES, AND D. RUIZ, A block projection method for sparse matrices, SIAM J. Scientific and Statistical Computing, 13 (1992), pp. 47–70. [2] E. BOMAN, K. DEVINE, L. A. FISK, R. HEAPHY, B. HENDRICKSON, C. VAUGHAN, U. CATALYUREK, D. BOZDAG, W. MITCHELL, AND J. TERESCO, Zoltan 3.0: Parallel Partitioning, Load-balancing, and Data Management Services; User’s Guide, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2007. Tech. Report SAND2007-4748W http://www.cs.sandia. gov/Zoltan/ug_html/ug.html. [3] S. CAYROLS, I. S. DUFF, AND F. LOPEZ, Parallelization of the solve phase in a task-based Cholesky solver using a sequential task flow model, Int. J. of High Performance Computing Applications, To appear (2019). NLAFET Working Note 20. RAL-TR-2018-008. [4] T. A. DAVIS, I. S. DUFF, AND S. NAKOV, Design and implementation of a parallel Markowitz threshold algorithm, Technical Report RAL-TR-2019-003, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire, England, 2019. NLAFET Working Note 22. Submitted to SIMAX. [5] I. S. DUFF, R. GUIVARCH, D. RUIZ, AND M. ZENADI, The augmented block Cimmino distributed method, SIAM J. Scientific Computing, 37 (2015), pp. A1248–A1269. [6] I. S. DUFF, J. HOGG, AND F. LOPEZ, A new sparse symmetric indefinite solver using a posteriori threshold pivoting, SIAM J. Scientific Computing, To appear (2019). NLAFET Working Note 21. RAL-TR-2018-012. [7] M. LUBY, A simple parallel algorithm for the maximal independent set problem, SIAM J. Computing, 15 (1986), pp. 1036–1053. [8] M. ZENADI, The solution of large sparse linear systems on parallel computers using a hybrid implementation of the block Cimmino method., These de Doctorat, ´ Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Toulouse, France, decembre 2013.

Thu, 30 Jan 2020

13:00 - 14:00
N3.12

How to use maths to solve philosophy, human value, AI, and save the world

Stuart Armstrong
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

How would we get a powerful AI to align itself with human preferences? What are human preferences anyway? And how can you code all this?
It turns out that maths give you the grounding to answer these fascinating and vital questions.
 

Thu, 30 Jan 2020
12:00
L4

Asymptotic stability of peaked travelling waves for Camassa-Holm type equations.

José Manuel Palacios
(Université de Tours)
Abstract

The Camassa-Holm (CH) equation is a nonlinear nonlocal dispersive equation which arises as a model for the propagation of unidirectional shallow water waves over a flat bottom. One of the most important features of the CH equation is the existence of peaked travelling waves, also called peakons. The aim of this talk is to review some asymptotic stability result for peakon solutions for CH-type equations as well as to present some new result for higher-order generalization of the CH equation.

Wed, 29 Jan 2020
16:00
C1

Aut(T) has trivial outer automorphism group

Ido Grayevsky
(Oxford University)
Abstract


The automorphism group of a d-regular tree is a topological group with many interesting features. A nice thing about this group is that while some of its features are highly non-trivial (e.g., the existence of infinitely many pairwise non-conjugate simple subgroups), often the ideas involved in the proofs are fairly intuitive and geometric. 
I will present a proof for the fact that the outer automorphism group of (Aut(T)) is trivial. This is original joint work with Gil Goffer, but as is often the case in this area, was already proven by Bass-Lubotzky 20 years ago. I will mainly use this talk to hint at how algebra, topology and geometry all play a role when working with Aut(T).
 

Wed, 29 Jan 2020
02:00
N3.12

Introduction to scrolls

Geoffrey Otieno Mboya
((Oxford University))
Abstract

Scrolls play a central role in the construction of varieties; they are ambient spaces for K3 surfaces and Fano 3-folds. In this talk, I will say in two ways what scrolls are and give examples of some embedded varieties in them.

Tue, 28 Jan 2020

16:00 - 17:00
C1

A Fourier-analytic approach to the transport AKT theorem.

Sergey Bobkov
(University of Minnesota)
Abstract

We will be discussing a Fourier-analytic approach
to optimal matching between independent samples, with
an elementary proof of the Ajtai-Komlos-Tusnady theorem.
The talk is based on a joint work with Michel Ledoux.

Tue, 28 Jan 2020

15:30 - 16:30
L6

A Pfaffian - determinantal duality in random matrices and last passage percolation

Nikolaos Zygouras
(University of Warwick)
Abstract

It is known that random matrix distributions such as those that describe the largest eignevalue of the Gaussian Orthogonal and Symplectic ensembles (GOE, GSE) admit two types of representations: one in terms of a Fredholm Pfaffian and one in terms of a Fredholm determinant. The equality of the two sets of expressions has so far been established via involved computations of linear algebraic nature. We provide a structural explanation of this duality via links (old and new) between the model of last passage percolation and the irreducible characters of classical groups, in particular the general linear, symplectic and orthogonal groups, and by studying, combinatorially, how their representations decompose when restricted to certain subgroups. Based on joint work with Elia Bisi.

Tue, 28 Jan 2020

15:30 - 16:30
L4

Donaldson-Thomas theory and tautological bundles on Hilbert schemes of points on surfaces

Noah Arbesfeld
(Imperial College)
Abstract

Tautological bundles on Hilbert schemes of points often enter into enumerative and physical computations. I will explain how to use the Donaldson-Thomas theory of toric threefolds to produce combinatorial identities that are expressed geometrically using tautological bundles on the Hilbert scheme of points on a surface. I'll also explain how these identities can be used to study Euler characteristics of tautological bundles over Hilbert schemes of points on general surfaces.

Tue, 28 Jan 2020
14:30
L5

Dimensionality reduction techniques for global optimization

Adilet Otemissov
(Oxford)
Abstract

We show that the scalability challenges of Global Optimisation algorithms can be overcome for functions with low effective dimensionality, which are constant along certain linear subspaces. Such functions can often be found in applications, for example, in hyper-parameter optimization for neural networks, heuristic algorithms for combinatorial optimization problems and complex engineering simulations. We propose the use of random subspace embeddings within a(ny) global minimisation algorithm, extending the approach in Wang et al. (2016). Using tools from random matrix theory and conic integral geometry, we investigate the efficacy and convergence of our random subspace embeddings approach, in a static and/or adaptive formulation. We illustrate our algorithmic proposals and theoretical findings numerically, using state of the art global solvers. This work is joint with Coralia Cartis.
 

Tue, 28 Jan 2020

14:15 - 15:15
L4

Soficity and variations on Higman's group.

Prof. Tim Riley
(Cornell)
Further Information


A group is sofic when every finite subset can be well approximated in a finite symmetric group. The outstanding question, due to Gromov, is whether every group is sofic.
Helfgott and Juschenko argued that a celebrated group constructed by Higman is unlikely to be sofic because its soficity would imply the existence of some seemingly pathological functions.  I will describe joint work with Martin Kassabov and Vivian Kuperberg in which we construct variations on Higman's group and explore their soficity.  
 

Tue, 28 Jan 2020
14:00
L6

Edge-sampling and modularity

Fiona Skerman
(Bristol University)
Abstract

Modularity is a function on graphs which is used in algorithms for community detection. For a given graph G, each partition of the vertices has a modularity score, with higher values indicating that the partition better captures community structure in $G$. The (max) modularity $q^\ast(G)$ of the graph $G$ is defined to be the maximum over all vertex partitions of the modularity score, and satisfies $0 \leq q^\ast(G) \leq 1$.

We analyse when community structure of an underlying graph can be determined from an observed subset of the graph. In a natural model where we suppose edges in an underlying graph $G$ appear with some probability in our observed graph $G'$ we describe how high a sampling probability we need to infer the community structure of the underlying graph.

Joint work with Colin McDiarmid.