We propose Swampland constraints on consistent 5d N=1 supergravity theories. In particular, we focus on a special class of BPS monopole strings which arise only in gravitational theories. The central charges and the levels of current algebras of 2d CFTs on these strings can be computed using the anomaly inflow mechanism and provide constraints for the 5d supergravity using unitarity of the worldsheet CFT. In M-theory, where these theories can be realised by compactification on Calabi-Yau threefolds, the special monopole strings arise from M5 branes wrapping “semi-ample” 4-cycles in the threefolds. We further identify necessary geometric conditions that such cycles need to satisfy and translate them into constraints for the low-energy gravity theory.

It is one of the most challenging issues in applied mathematics to approximately solve high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) and most of the numerical approximation methods for PDEs in the scientific literature suffer from the so-called curse of dimensionality (CoD) in the sense that the number of computational operations employed in the corresponding approximation scheme to obtain an  approximation precision $\varepsilon >0$ grows exponentially in the PDE dimension and/or the reciprocal of $\varepsilon$. Recently, certain deep learning based approximation methods for PDEs have been proposed  and various numerical simulations for such methods suggest that deep neural network (DNN) approximations might have the capacity to indeed overcome the CoD in the sense that  the number of real parameters used to describe the approximating DNNs  grows at most polynomially in both the PDE dimension $d \in  \N$ and the reciprocal of the prescribed approximation accuracy $\varepsilon >0$. There are now also a few rigorous mathematical results in the scientific literature which  substantiate this conjecture by proving that  DNNs overcome the CoD in approximating solutions of PDEs.  Each of these results establishes that DNNs overcome the CoD in approximating suitable PDE solutions  at a fixed time point $T >0$ and on a compact cube $[a, b]^d$ but none of these results provides an answer to the question whether the entire PDE solution on $[0, T] \times [a, b]^d$ can be approximated by DNNs without the CoD. 
In this talk we show that for every $a \in \R$, $ b \in (a, \infty)$ solutions of  suitable  Kolmogorov PDEs can be approximated by DNNs on the space-time region $[0, T] \times [a, b]^d$ without the CoD. 

One of the key objects in studying the Hilbert Scheme of points in the plane is a torus action of $(\mathbb{C}^*)^2$. The fixed points of this action correspond to monomial ideals in $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$, and this gives a connection between the geometry of Hilbert schemes and partition combinatorics. Using this connection, one can extract identities in partition combinatorics from algebro-geometric information and vice versa. I will give some examples of combinatorial identities where as yet the only proofs we have rely on the geometry of Hilbert schemes. If there is time, I will also sketch out a hope that such identities can also be seen by representations of appropriately chosen algebras.

One of the fundamental examples of geometric representation theory is the Springer correspondence which parameterises the irreducible representations of the Weyl group of a lie algebra in terms of nilpotent orbits of the lie algebra and irreducible representations of the equivariant fundamental group of said nilpotent orbits. If you don’t like geometry this may sound entirely mysterious. In this talk I will hopefully offer a gentle introduction to the subject and present a preprint by Lusztig (2020) which gives an entirely algebraic description of the springer correspondence.

A Real representation of a $C_2$-graded group $H < G$ ($H$ an index two subgroup) is a complex representation of $H$ with an action of the other coset $G \backslash H$ (“odd" elements) satisfying appropriate algebraic coherence conditions. In this talk I will present three such Real representation theories. In these, each odd element acts as an antilinear operator, a bilinear form or a sesquilinear form (equivalently a linear map to $V$ from the conjugate, the dual, or the conjugate dual of $V$) respectively. I will describe how these theories are related, how representations in each are classified, and how the first generalises the classical representation theory of $H$ over the real numbers - retaining much of its beauty and subtlety.