Mon, 06 Mar 2017

12:45 - 13:45
L3

Holographic renormalization and supersymmetry

Pietro Benetti-Genolini
(Oxford)
Abstract

Localization and holography are powerful approaches to the computation of supersymmetric observables. The computations may, however, include divergences. Therefore, one needs renormalization schemes preserving supersymmetry. I will consider minimal gauged supergravity in five dimensions to demonstrate that the standard holographic renormalization scheme breaks supersymmetry, and propose a set of non-standard boundary counterterms that restore supersymmetry. I will then show that for a certain class of solutions the improved on-shell action correctly reproduces an intrinsic observable of four-dimensional SCFTs, the supersymmetric Casimir energy.

 
Mon, 20 Feb 2017

12:45 - 13:45
L3

Dualities of Deformed N=2 SCFTs from torus knots and links

Fabian Ruehle
(Oxford)
Abstract

We study D3 brane theories that are described as deformations of N=2 SCFTs. They arise at the self-intersection of a 7-brane in F-Theory. As we shall explain, the associated string junctions and their monodromies can be studied via torus knots or links. The monodromy reduces (potentially different) flavor algebras of dual deformations of N=2 theories and projects out charged states, leading to N=1 SCFTs. We propose an explanation for these effects in terms of an electron-monopole-dyon condensate.

 
 
Wed, 15 Feb 2017
16:00
C2

Topological properties of some subsets of ßN

Dona Strauss
(Leeds)
Abstract

 Anyone who has worked in $\beta $N will not be surprised to learn that some of the algebraically defined subsets of $\beta N$ are not topologically simple, even though their algebraic definition may be very simple.  I shall show that the following subsets of $\beta N$ are not Borel: $N^*+N^*$; the smallest ideal of $\beta N$; the set of idempotents in $\beta N$; any semiprincipal right ideal in $\beta N$; the set of idempotents in any left ideal in $\beta N$.

Thu, 16 Feb 2017
11:00
C5

Model Theory of Shimura Varieties

Sebastian Eterovic
Abstract


Given a Shimura variety, I will show how to define a corresponding two-sorted structure. Based on work of Chris Daw and Adam Harris, we will study what is needed for the class of this structures to be categorical. Of course, an introduction to Shimura varieties will be given.
 

Thu, 16 Feb 2017
11:00
C5

Model Theory of Shimura Varieties

Sebastian Eterovic
Abstract


Given a Shimura variety, I will show how to define a corresponding two-sorted structure. Based on work of Chris Daw and Adam Harris, we will study what is needed for the class of this structures to be categorical. Of course, an introduction to Shimura varieties will be given.

In an interview with Rolling Stone Magazine in 1965, Bob Dylan was pushed to define himself: Do you think of yourself primarily as a singer or a poet? To which, Dylan famously replied: Oh, I think of myself more as a song and dance man, y’know. Dylan’s attitude to pigeonholing resonates with many applied mathematicians. I lack the coolness factor of Dylan, but if pushed about defining what kind of mathematician I am, I would say: Oh, I think myself more as an equation and matrix guy, y’know. 

Wed, 26 Apr 2017
16:00
C1

The Morse boundary

David Hume
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

We give a construction of a boundary (the Morse boundary) which can be assigned to any proper geodesic metric space and which is rigid, in the sense that a quasi-isometry of spaces induces a homeomorphism of boundaries. To obtain a more workable invariant than the homeomorphism type, I will introduce the metric Morse boundary and discuss notions of capacity and conformal dimensions of the metric Morse boundary. I will then demonstrate that these dimensions give useful invariants of relatively hyperbolic and mapping class groups. This is joint work with Matthew Cordes (Technion).

Wed, 01 Mar 2017
16:00
C1

Treelike structures in boundaries of hyperbolic groups

Benjamin Barrett
(University of Cambridge)
Abstract

Inspired by the theory of JSJ decomposition for 3-manifolds, one can define the JSJ decomposition of a group as a maximal canonical way of cutting it up into simpler pieces using amalgamated products and HNN extensions. If the group in question has some sort of non-positive curvature property then one can define a boundary at infinity for the group, which captures its large scale geometry. The JSJ decomposition of the group is then reflected in the treelike structure of the boundary. In this talk I will discuss this connection in the case of hyperbolic groups and explain some of the ideas used in its proof by Brian Bowditch.

Wed, 15 Feb 2017
16:00
C1

Asymptotic Dimension and Coarse Cohomology

Alex Margolis
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Asymptotic dimension is a large-scale analogue of Lebesgue covering dimension. I will give a gentle introduction to asymptotic dimension, prove some basic propeties and give some applications to group theory. I will then define coarse homology and explain how when defined, virtual cohomological dimension gives a lower bound on asymptotic dimension.

Subscribe to