Thu, 23 Feb 2017

16:00 - 17:30
L4

Beating the Omega clock: Optimal strategies for nervous and impatient investors

Neofytos Rodosthenous
Abstract

We consider impatient decision makers when their assets' prices are in undesirable low regions for a significant amount of time, and they are risk averse to negative price jumps. We wish to study the unusual reactions of investors under such adverse market conditions. In mathematical terms, we study the optimal exercising of an American call option in a random time-horizon under spectrally negative Lévy models. The random time-horizon is modeled by an alarm of the so-called Omega default clock in insurance, which goes off when the cumulative amount of time spent by the asset price in an undesirable low region exceeds an independent exponential random time. We show that the optimal exercise strategies vary both quantitatively and qualitatively with the levels of impatience and nervousness of the investors, and we give a complete characterization of all optimal exercising thresholds. 

Thu, 16 Feb 2017

16:00 - 17:30
L4

Intraday Market Making with Overnight Inventory Costs

Agostino Capponi
Abstract

The share of market making conducted by high-frequency trading (HFT) firms has been rising steadily. A distinguishing feature of HFTs is that they trade intraday, ending the day flat. To shed light on the economics of HFTs, and in a departure from existing market making theories, we model an HFT that has access to unlimited leverage intraday but must fund any end-of-day inventory at an exogenously determined cost. Even though the inventory costs only occur at the end of the day, they impact intraday price and liquidity dynamics. This gives rise to an intraday endogenous price impact mechanism. As time approaches the end of the trading day, the sensitivity of prices to inventory levels intensifies, making price impact stronger and widening bid-ask spreads. Moreover, imbalances of buy and sell orders may catalyze hikes and drops of prices, even under fixed supply and demand functions. Empirically, we show that these predictions are borne out in the U.S. Treasury market, where bid-ask spreads and price impact tend to rise towards the end of the day. Furthermore, price movements are negatively correlated with changes in inventory levels as measured by the cumulative net trading volume.
 

(based on joint work with Tobias Adrian, Erik Vogt, and Hongzhong Zhang)

Thu, 09 Feb 2017

16:00 - 17:30
L4

Time Consistency in Decision Making

Igor Cialenco
Abstract

We propose a new flexible unified framework for studying the time consistency property suited for a large class of maps defined on the set of all cash flows and that are postulated to satisfy only two properties -- monotonicity and locality. This framework integrates the existing forms of time consistency for dynamic risk measures and dynamic performance measures (also known as acceptability indices). The time consistency is defined in terms of an update rule, a novel notion that would be discussed into details and illustrated through various examples. Finally, we will present some connections between existing popular forms of time consistency. 
This is a joint work with Tomasz R. Bielecki and Marcin Pitera.

Thu, 02 Feb 2017

16:00 - 17:30
L4

tba

Peter Bank
Thu, 26 Jan 2017

16:00 - 17:30
L4

tba

Ulrich Horst
(Humboldt Universität zu Berlin)
Fri, 10 Mar 2017

13:00 - 14:00
L6

Calibration and Monte Carlo pricing under a four-factor hybrid local-stochastic volatility model

Matthieu Mariapragassam and Andrei Cozma
Abstract

The efficient pricing and hedging of vanilla and exotic foreign exchange options requires an adequate model that takes into account both the local and the stochastic features of the volatility dynamics. In this joint work, we put forward a four-factor hybrid local-stochastic volatility (LSV) model that combines state-of-the-art dynamics for the exchange rate with stochastic dynamics for the domestic and foreign short rates, and provide a consistent and self-contained calibration and pricing framework.
For the calibration, we propose a novel and generic algorithm that builds on the particle method of Guyon and Labordere. We combine it with new variance reduction techniques to accelerate convergence and use control variates derived from a pure local volatility model, the stochastic short rates and the two-factor Heston-type LSV model. Our numerical experiments show a dramatic variance reduction that allows us to calibrate the four-factor model at almost no extra computational cost. The method can be applied to a large class of hybrid LSV models and is not restricted to our particular choice of the diffusion.
For the pricing, we propose a Monte Carlo simulation scheme that combines the full truncation Euler (FTE) scheme for the stochastic volatility and the stochastic short rates with the log-Euler scheme for the exchange rate. We find a lower bound on the explosion time of exponential moments of FTE approximations, and prove the strong convergence of the exchange rate approximations and the convergence of Monte Carlo estimators for a number of vanilla and exotic options. We then carry out numerical experiments to justify our choice of model and demonstrate convergence.
 

Fri, 24 Feb 2017

13:00 - 14:00
L6

Second Year DPhil Student Talks Yixuan Wang and Marco Pangallo

Abstract


Speaker: Yixuan Wang
Titile: Minimum resting time with market orders
Abstract:  Regulators have been discussing possible rules to control high frequency trading and decrease market speed, and minimum resting time is one of them. We develop a simple mathematical model, and derive an asymptotic expression of the expected PnL, which is also the performance criteria that a market maker would like to maximize by choosing the optimal depth at which she posts the limit order. We investigate the comparative statistics of the optimal depth with each parameters, an in particular the comparative statistics show that the minimum resting time will decrease the market liquidity, forcing the market makers to post limit orders of volume 1.


Speaker: Marco Pangallo
Title: Does learning converge in generic games?
Abstract: In game theory, learning has often been proposed as a convincing method to achieve coordination on an equilibrium. But does learning converge, and to what? We start investigating the drivers of instability in the simplest possible non-trivial setting, that is generic 2-person, 2-strategy normal form games. In payoff matrices with a unique mixed strategy equilibrium the players may follow the best-reply cycle and fail to converge to the Nash Equilibrium (NE): we rather observe limit cycles or low-dimensional chaos. We then characterize the cyclic structure of games with many moves as a combinatorial problem: we quantify exactly how many best-reply configurations give rise to cycles or to NE, and show that acyclic (e.g. coordination, potential, supermodular) games become more and more rare as the number of moves increases (a fortiori if the payoffs are negatively correlated and with more than two players).  In most games the learning dynamics ends up in limit cycles or high-dimensional chaotic attractors, preventing the players to coordinate. Strategic interactions would then be governed by learning in an ever-changing environment, rather than by rational and fully-informed equilibrium thinking.
Collaborators: J. D. Farmer, T. Galla, T. Heinrich, J. Sanders

Subscribe to