Let X_1 and X_2 be finite graphs with isomorphic universal covers.
Leighton's graph covering theorem states that X_1 and X_2 have a common finite cover.
I will discuss recent work generalizing this theorem and how myself and Sam Shepherd have been applying it to rigidity questions in geometric group theory.
Gromov hyperbolicity is a property to metric spaces that generalises the notion of negative curvature for manifolds.
After an introduction about these spaces, we will explain the construction of horocyclic products related to lamplighter groups, Baumslag solitar groups and the Sol geometry.
We will describe the shape of geodesics in them, and present rigidity results on their quasi-isometries due to Farb, Mosher, Eskin, Fisher and Whyte.
Let phi be an outer automorphism of a free group. A topological representative of phi is a marked graph G along with a homotopy equivalence f: G → G which induces the outer automorphism phi on the fundamental group of G. For any given outer automorphism, the choice of topological representative is far from unique. Handel and Bestvina showed that sufficiently nice automorphisms admit a special type of topological representative called a train track map, whose dynamics can be well understood.
In this talk I will outline the definition and motivation for train tracks, and give a sketch of Handel and Bestvina’s algorithm for finding them.
Limit groups are a powerful tool in the study of free and hyperbolic groups (and even broader classes of groups). I will define limit groups in various ways: algebraic, logical and topological, and draw connections between the different definitions. We will also see how one can equip a limit group with an action on a real tree, and analyze this action using the Rips machine, a generalization of Bass-Serre theory to real trees. As a conclusion, we will obtain that hyperbolic groups whose outer automorphism group is infinite, split non-trivially as graphs of groups.
On any hyperbolic surface, the number of curves of length at most L is finite. However, it is not immediately clear how quickly this number grows with L. We will discuss Mirzakhani’s breakthrough result regarding the asymptotic behaviour of this number, along with recent efforts to generalise her result using currents.
Right-angled Artin groups (RAAGs) were first introduced in the 70s by Baudisch and further developed in the 80s by Droms.
They have attracted much attention in Geometric Group Theory. One of the many reasons is that it has been shown that all hyperbolic 3-manifold groups are virtually finitely presented subgroups of RAAGs.
In the first part of the talk, I will discuss some of their interesting properties. I will explain some of their relations with manifold groups and their importance in finiteness conditions for groups.
In the second part, I will focus on my PhD project concerning subgroups of direct products of RAAGs.
The automorphism group of a d-regular tree is a topological group with many interesting features. A nice thing about this group is that while some of its features are highly non-trivial (e.g., the existence of infinitely many pairwise non-conjugate simple subgroups), often the ideas involved in the proofs are fairly intuitive and geometric.
I will present a proof for the fact that the outer automorphism group of (Aut(T)) is trivial. This is original joint work with Gil Goffer, but as is often the case in this area, was already proven by Bass-Lubotzky 20 years ago. I will mainly use this talk to hint at how algebra, topology and geometry all play a role when working with Aut(T).
Whitehead published two papers in 1936 on free groups. Both concerned decision problems for equivalence of (sets of) elements under automorphisms. The first focused on primitive elements (those that appear in some basis), the second looked at arbitrary sets of elements. While both of the resulting algorithms are combinatorial, Whitehead's proofs that these algorithms actually work involve some nice manipulation of surfaces in 3-manifolds. We will have a look at how this works for primitive elements. I'll outline some generalizations due to Culler-Vogtmann, Gertsen, and Stallings, and if we have time talk about how it fits in with some of my current work.
Knotoids are a generalisation of knots that deals with open curves. In the past few years, they’ve been extensively used to classify entanglement in proteins. Through a double branched cover construction, we prove a 1-1 correspondence between knotoids and strongly invertible knots. We characterise forbidden moves between knotoids in terms of equivariant band attachments between strongly invertible knots, and in terms of crossing changes between theta-curves. Finally, we present some applications to the study of the topology of proteins. This is based on joint works with D.Buck, H.A.Harrington, M.Lackenby and with D. Goundaroulis.
A group splits as an HNN-extension if and only if the rank of its abelianisation is strictly positive. If we fix a class of groups one may ask a few questions about these splittings: How distorted are the vertex and edge groups? What form can the vertex and edge groups take? If they remain in our fixed class, do they also split? If so, under iteration will we terminate at something nice? In this talk we will answer all these questions for the class of one-relator groups and go through an example or two. Time permitting, we will also discuss possible generalisations to groups with staggered presentations.
