Past Junior Topology and Group Theory Seminar

The Ivanov conjecture is equivalent to the statement that every covering map of surfaces has the so-called Putman-Wieland property. I will discuss my recent work with Vlad Marković, where we prove it for asymptotically all coverings as the degree grows. I will give some overview of our main tool: spectral geometry, which is related to objects like the heat kernel of a hyperbolic surface, or Cheeger connectivity constant.

The mapping class group of a surface has a hierarchical structure in which the geometry of the group can be seen by examining its action on the curve graph of every subsurface. This behavior was one of the motivating examples for a generalization of hyperbolicity called hierarchical hyperbolicity. Hierarchical hyperbolicity has many desirable consequences, but the definition is long, and proving that a group satisfies it is generally difficult. This difficulty motivated the introduction of a new condition called combinatorial hierarchical hyperbolicity by Behrstock, Hagen, Martin, and Sisto in 2020 which implies the original and is more straightforward to check. In recent work, Hagen, Mangioni, and Sisto developed a method for building a combinatorial hierarchically hyperbolic structure from a (sufficiently nice) hierarchically hyperbolic one. The goal of this talk is to describe their construction in the case of the mapping class group and illustrate some of the parallels between the combinatorial structure and the original. 

You may be surprised to see the generalised Riemann hypothesis appear in algorithmic topology. For example, knottedness was originally shown to be in NP under the assumption of GRH.
Where does this condition come from? We will discuss this in the context of 3-sphere recognition, and examine why the approach fails for higher dimensions.

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that an infinite group in possession of a good algebraic structure, must be in want of a hyperbolic space to act on. For the mapping class group of a surface, one of the most popular choices is the curve graph. This is a combinatorial object, built from curves on the surface and intersection patterns between them.
Hyperbolicity of the curve graph was proved by Masur and Minsky in a celebrated paper in 1999. In the same article, they showed how the geometry of the action on this graph reflects dynamical/topological properties of the mapping class group; in particular, loxodromic elements are precisely the pseudo-Anosov mapping classes.
In light of this, one would like to better understand distances in the curve graph. The graph is locally infinite, and finding a shortest path between two vertices is highly non-trivial. In this talk, we will see how to use the machinery of train tracks to overcome this issue and compute (approximate) distances in the curve graph. If time permits -- which, somehow, it never does -- we will also analyse this construction from an algorithmic perspective.

The space of subgroups of a countable group is a compact topological space which encodes many of the properties of its non-free actions. We will discuss some approaches to studying the Cantor-Bendixson decomposition of this space in the context of hyperbolic groups and groups which act (nicely) on trees. We will also give some conditions under which the conjugation action on the perfect kernel is highly topologically transitive and see how this can be applied to find new examples of groups (including all virtually compact special groups) which admit faithful transitive amenable actions. This is joint work with Damien Gaboriau.

An old and challenging conjecture proposed by R.H. Fox in 1962 states that the absolute values of the coefficients of the Alexander polynomial of an alternating knot are trapezoidal i.e. strictly increase, possibly plateau, then strictly decrease. We give a survey of the known results and use them to motivate the study of branched double covers. The second part of the talk focuses on the properties of the branched double covers of alternating knots.

Algebraic fibring is the group-theoretic analogue of fibration over the circle for manifolds. Generalising the work of Agol on hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Kielak showed that many groups virtually fibre. In this talk we will discuss the geometry of groups which fibre, with some fun applications to Poincare duality groups - groups whose homology and cohomology invariants satisfy a Poincare-Lefschetz type duality, like those of manifolds - as well as to exotic subgroups of Gromov hyperbolic groups. No prior knowledge of these topics will be assumed.

Disclaimer: This talk will contain many manifolds.

If some structure, mathematical or otherwise, is giving you grief, then often the first thing to do is to attempt to break the offending object down into (finitely many) simpler pieces.

In group theory, when we speak of questions of *accessibility* we are referring to the ability to achieve precisely this. The idea of an 'accessible group' was first coined by Terry Wall in the 70s, and since then has left quite a mark on our field (and others). In this talk I will introduce the toolbox required to study accessibility, and walk you and your groups through some reasons to be accessible.

Asymptotic dimension was introduced by Gromov as an invariant of finitely generated groups. It can be shown that if two metric spaces are quasi-isometric then they have the same asymptotic dimension. In 1998, the asymptotic dimension achieved particular prominence in geometric group theory after a paper of Guoliang Yu, which proved the Novikov conjecture for groups with finite asymptotic dimension. Unfortunately, not all finitely generated groups have finite asymptotic dimension. 

In this talk, we will introduce some basic tools to compute the asymptotic dimension of groups. We will also find upper bounds for the asymptotic dimension of a few well-known classes of finitely generated groups, such as hyperbolic groups, and if time permits, we will see why one-relator groups have asymptotic dimension at most two.

A common pastime of geometric group theorists is to try and derive algebraic information about a group from the geometric properties of its Cayley graphs. One of the most classical demonstrations of this can be seen in the work of Maschke (1896) in characterising those finite groups with planar Cayley graphs. Since then, much work has been done on this topic. In this talk, I will attempt to survey some results in this area, and show that the class group with planar Cayley graphs is QI-rigid.

The virtual Haken theorem is one of the most influential recent results in 3-manifold theory. The statement dates back to Waldhausen, who conjectured that every aspherical closed 3-manifold has a finite cover containing an essential embedded closed surface. The proof is usually attributed to Agol, although his virtual special theorem is only the last piece of the puzzle. This talk is dedicated to the unsung heroes of virtual Haken, the mathematicians whose invaluable work helped turning this conjecture into a theorem. We will trace the history of a mathematical thread that connects Thurston-Perelman's geometrisation to Agol's final contribution, surveying Kahn-Markovic's surface subgroup theorem, Bergeron-Wise's cubulation of 3-manifold groups, Haglund-Wise's special cube complexes, Wise's work on quasi-convex hierarchies and Agol-Groves-Manning's weak separation theorem.

We will look at the vanishing of group cohomology from the perspective of Kazhdan’s property (T). We will investigate an analogue of this property for any degree, introduced by U. Bader and P. W. Nowak in 2020 and describe a method of proving these properties with computers.

We will give an introduction to hyperbolic cusps and their Dehn fillings. In particular, we will give a brief survey of quantitive results in the field. To motivate this work, we will sketch how these techniques are used for studying the classical question of characteristic slopes on knots.

This talk is concerned with the question of generating the homology of a covering space by lifts of simple closed curves (from topological viewpoint), and generating the first homology of a subgroup by powers of elements outside certain filtrations (from group-theoretic viewpoint). I will sketch Malestein's and Putman's construction of examples of branched covers where lifts of scc's span a proper subspace. I will discuss the relation of their proof to the Magnus embedding, and present recent results on similar embeddings of surface groups which facilitate extending their theorems to unbranched covers.

Geometric (even combinatorial) group theory suffers from the unfortunate situation that many obvious questions about group presentations (ex: is this a presentation of the trivial group? is this word the identity in that group?) cannot be answered. Not only "we don't know how to tell" but "we know that we cannot know how to tell" - this is called undecidability. This talk will serve as an introduction (for non-experts, since I am also such) to the area of group theoretic decision problems: I'll aim to cover some problems, some solutions (or half-solutions) and some of the general sources of undecidability, as well as featuring some of my (least?) favourite pathological groups.

Given a mathematical object, what can you compute about it? In some settings, you cannot say very much. Given an arbitrary group presentation, for example, there is no procedure to decide whether the group is trivial. In 3-manifolds, however, algorithms are a fruitful and active area of study (and some of them are even implementable!). One of the main tools in this area is normal surface theory, which allows us to describe interesting surfaces in a 3-manifold with respect to an arbitrary triangulation. I will discuss some results in this area, particularly around Seifert fibered spaces.

Stable commutator length (scl) is a measure of homological complexity in groups that has attracted attention for its various connections with geometric topology and group theory. In this talk, I will introduce scl and discuss the (hard) problem of computing scl in surface groups. I will present some results concerning isometric embeddings of free groups for scl, and how they generalise to surface groups for the relative Gromov seminorm.

A fundamental result in 3-manifold topology is the loop theorem: Given a null-homotopic simple closed curve in the boundary of a compact 3-manifold $M$, it bounds an embedded disk in $M$. The standard topological proof of this uses the tower construction due to Papakyriakopoulos. In this talk, I will introduce basic existence and regularity results on minimal surfaces, and show how to use the tower construction to prove a geometric version of the loop theorem due to Meeks--Yau: Given a null-homotopic simple closed curve in the boundary of a compact Riemannian 3-manifold $M$ with convex boundary, it bounds an embedded disk of least area. This also gives an independent proof of the (topological) loop theorem.

Many classes of finitely generated groups have been studied using formal language theory techniques. One historical example is the study of geodesics, which gives rise to the strict growth series of a group. Properties of languages associated to groups can provide insight into the nature of the growth series.

In this talk we will introduce languages associated to conjugacy classes, rather than elements of the group. This will lead us to define an analogous series, namely the conjugacy growth series of a group, which has become a popular topic in recent years. After discussing the necessary group theoretic and language tools needed, we will focus on how these conjugacy languages behave in graph products. We will finish with some new results which look at when these properties can extend to virtual graph products.

Group cohomology is a powerful tool which has found many applications in modern group theory. It can be calculated and interpreted through geometric, algebraic and topological means, and as such it encodes the relationships between these different aspects of infinite groups. The aim of this talk is to introduce a circle of ideas which link group cohomology with the theory of BNS invariants, and the property of being subgroup separable. No prior knowledge of any of these topics will be assumed.

Condensed Mathematics is a tool recently developed by Clausen and Scholze and it is proving fruitful in many areas of algebra and geometry. In this talk, we will cover the definition of condensed sets, the analogues of topological spaces in the condensed setting. We will also talk about condensed modules over a ring and some of their nice properties like forming an abelian category. Finally, we'll discuss some recent results that have been obtained through the application of Condensed Mathematics.

The handlebody group is defined as the mapping class group of a three-dimensional handlebody. We will survey some geometric and algebraic properties of the handlebody groups and compare them to those of two of the most studied (classes of) groups in geometric group theory, namely mapping class groups of surfaces, and ${\rm Out}(F_n)$. We will also introduce the disk graph, the handlebody-analogon of the curve graph of a surface, and discuss some of its properties.

Given a group of type ${\rm FP}_n$, one may ask if this property also holds for its subgroups. The BNS invariant is a subset of the character sphere that fully captures this information for subgroups that are kernels of characters. It also provides an interesting connection of finiteness properties of subgroups and group homology. In this talk I am going to give an introduction to this problem and present an attempt to generalize the BNS invariant to more subgroups than just the kernels of characters.

In recent years, a tend of higher category theory is growing from multiple areas of research throughout mathematics, physics and theoretical computer science. Guided by Cobordism Hypothesis, I would like to introduce some basics of `higher representation theory’, i.e. the part of higher category theory where we focus on the fundamental objects: `finite dimensional’ linear n-categories. If time permits, I will also introduce some recent progress in linear higher categories and motivations from condensed matter physics.

Persistent homology is both a powerful framework for data science and a fruitful source of mathematical questions. Here, we will give an introduction to both single-parameter and multiparameter persistent homology. We will see some examples of how topology has been successfully applied to the real world, and also explore some of the pure-mathematical ideas that arise from this new perspective.

Separability is an algebraic property enjoyed by certain subsets of groups. In the world of non-positively curved groups, it has a not-too-well-understood link to geometric properties such as convexity. We explore this connection in the setting of relatively hyperbolic groups and discuss a recent joint work in this area involving products of quasiconvex subgroups.

We review a few instances in which the first $\ell^2$ Betti number of a group is a profinite invariant and we discuss some applications and open problems.

We survey the theory of $\ell^2$-invariants, their applications in group theory and topology, and introduce a positive characteristic version of $\ell^2$-theory. We also discuss the Atiyah and Lück approximation conjectures, two of the central problems in this area.

Profinite rigidity is essentially the study of which groups can be distinguished from each other by their finite quotients. This talk is meant to give a gentle introduction to the area - I will explain which questions are the right ones to ask and give an overview of some of the main results in the field. I will assume knowledge of what a group presentation is.

After a general introduction to the study of random walks on groups, we discuss the relationship between limit theorems for random walks on Lie groups and Diophantine properties of the underlying distribution. Indeed, we will discuss the classical abelian case and more recent results by Bourgain-Gamburd for compact simple Lie groups such as SO(3). If time permits, we discuss some new results for non-compact simple Lie groups such as SL_2(R). We hope to touch on the relevant methods from harmonic analysis, number theory and additive combinatorics. The talk is aimed at a general audience. 

A branched covering between two surfaces looks like a regular covering map except for finitely many branching points, where some non-trivial ramification may occur. Informally speaking, the existence problem asks whether we can find a branched covering with prescribed behaviour around its branching points.

A variety of techniques have historically been employed to tackle this problem, ranging from studying representations of surface groups into symmetric groups to drawing "dessins d'enfant" on the covering surface. After introducing these techniques and explaining how they can be applied to the existence problem, I will briefly present a conjecture unexpectedly relating branched coverings and prime numbers.
 

This will be a gentle introduction to the theory of pseudo-Anosov  flows on 3-manifolds, as seen from the perspective of a topologist and not a dynamicist.

I will start by considering geodesic flows on the unit tangent bundles of hyperbolic surfaces. This will lead to a definition of an Anosov and then a pseudo-Anosov flow on a 3-manifold. After discussing a couple of examples, I will outline some connections between pseudo-Anosov flows and other aspects of 3-manifold topology/ geometry/ group theory.

We will give a fairly self contained introduction to acylindrically hyperbolic groups, using mapping class groups as a motivating example. This will be a mainly expository talk, the aim is to make my topology seminar talk in week 5 more accessible to people who are less familiar with these topics.

The question of when you can quasiisometrically embed a solvable Baumslag-Solitar group into another turns out to be equivalent to the question of when you can (1,A)-quasiisometrically embed a rooted tree into another rooted tree. We will briefly describe the geometry of the solvable Baumslag-Solitar groups before attacking the problem of embedding trees. We will find that the existence of (1,A)-quasiisometric embeddings between trees is intimately related to the boundedness of a family of integer sequences. 

Knot projections for knots in the 3-sphere allow us to easily describe knots, compute invariants, enumerate all knots, manipulate them under Reidemister moves and feed them into a computer. One might hope for a similar representation of knots in general 3-manifolds. We will survey properties of knots in general 3-manifolds and discuss a proposed diagram-esque representation of them.

Amenable actions are answering the question: "When can we prevent things like the Banach-Tarski Paradox happening?". It turns out that the most intuitive measure-theoretic sufficient condition is also necessary. We will briefly discuss the paradox, prove the equivalent conditions for amenability, give some ways of producing interesting examples of amenable groups and talk about amenable groups which can't be produced in these 'elementary' ways.

Teaser question: show that you can't decompose Z into finitely many pieces, which after rearrangement by translations make two copies of Z. (I.e. that you can't get the Banach-Tarski paradox on Z.)

The Gromov boundary of a hyperbolic group is a useful topological invariant, the properties of which can encode all sorts of algebraic information. It has found application to some algorithmic questions, such as finding finite splittings (Dahmani-Groves) and, more recently, computing JSJ-decompositions (Barrett). In this talk we will introduce the boundary of a hyperbolic group. We'll outline how one can approximate the boundary with "large spheres" in the Cayley graph, in order to search for topological features. Finally, we will also discuss how this idea is applied in the aforementioned results. 

We will record some surprising and lesser-known properties of free groups, and use these to give a model theoretic analysis of free group automorphisms and orbits under Aut(F). This will result in a neat geometric description of (a logic-flavoured analogue of) algebraic closures in a free group. An almost immediate corollary will be that elementary subgroups of a free group are free factors.

I will assume no familiarity with first-order logic and model theory - the beginning of the talk will be devoted to familiarize everyone with the few required notions.

The aim is introducing the Bieri-Neumann-Strebel invariants and showing some computations. These are geometric invariants of abstract groups that capture information about the finite generation of kernels of abelian quotients.

The Teichmüller space for a closed surface of genus g is the space of marked complex/hyperbolic structures on the surface. Teichmüller space also identifies with the space of Fuchsian representations of the fundamental group into PSL(2,R) (mod conjugation). Higher Teichmüller theory concerns special representations of surface (or hyperbolic) groups into higher rank Lie groups of non-compact type.

A well-known conjecture of Ivanov states that mapping class groups of surfaces with genus at least 3 virtually do not surject onto the integers. Putman and Wieland reformulated this conjecture in terms of higher Prym representations of finite-index subgroups of mapping class groups. We show that the Putman-Wieland conjecture holds for geometrically uniform subgroups. Along the way we construct a cover S of the genus 2 surface such that the lifts of simple closed curves do not generate the rational homology of S. This is joint work with Markovic.

We say that a graph G is Local-to-Global rigid if there exists R>0 such that every other graph whose balls of radius R are isometric to the balls of radius R in G is covered by G. Examples include the Euclidean building of PSLn(Qp). We show that the rigidity of the building goes further by proving that a reconstruction is possible from only a partial local information, called “print”. We use this to prove the rigidity of graphs quasi-isometric to the building among which are the torsion-free lattices of PSLn(Qp).

Group theoretic Dehn filling, motivated by Dehn filling in the theory of 3- manifolds, is a process of constructing quotients of a given group. This technique is usually applied to groups with certain negative curvature feature, for example word-hyperbolic groups, to construct exotic and useful examples of groups. In this talk, I will start by recalling the notion of word-hyperbolic groups, and then show that how group theoretic Dehn filling can be used to answer the Burnside Problem and questions about mapping class groups of surfaces.

A big mapping class group is the mapping class group (MCG) of a surface of infinite type. Although several aspects of big MCGs remain mysterious, their geometric definition allows some simple, interesting arguments. In this talk, we will use big MCGs as an excuse to survey some (more or less) classical results in geometric group theory: we will present a quick introduction to infinite type surfaces, highlight differences between standard and large MCGs, and use Higman’s embedding theorem to deduce that there exists a big MCG that contains every finitely presented group as a subgroup.

Given a group G acting on a CAT(0) polygonal complex, X, it is natural to ask whether the structure of X allows us to deduce properties of G. We discuss some recent work on local properties that X may possess which allow us to answer these questions - in many cases we can in fact deduce that the group is a linear group over Z.