Past Logic Seminar

In 2010, Hrushovski--Loeser studied the homotopy type of the Berkovich analytification of a quasi-projective variety over a valued field. In this talk, we explore the extent to which some of their results might hold in a relative setting. More precisely, given a morphism of quasi-projective varieties over a valued field, we ask if we might construct deformation retractions of the analytifications of the source and target which are compatible with the analytification of the morphism and whose images are finite simplicial complexes. 

The Zilber-Pink conjecture predicts how large the intersection of a d-dimensional subvariety of an abelian variety/algebraic torus/Shimura variety/... with the union of special subvarieties of codimension > d can be (where the definition of "special" depends on the setting). In joint work with Fabrizio Barroero, we have reduced this conjecture for complex abelian varieties to the same conjecture for abelian varieties defined over the algebraic numbers. In work in progress, we introduce the notion of a distinguished category, which contains both connected commutative algebraic groups and connected mixed Shimura varieties. In any distinguished category, special subvarieties can be defined and a Zilber-Pink statement can be formulated. We show that any distinguished category satisfies the defect condition, introduced as a useful technical tool by Habegger and Pila. Under an additional assumption, which makes the category "very distinguished", we show furthermore that the Zilber-Pink statement in general follows from the case where the subvariety is defined over the algebraic closure of the field of definition of the distinguished variety. The proof closely follows our proof in the case of abelian varieties and leads also to unconditional results in the moduli space of principally polarized abelian surfaces as well as in fibered powers of the Legendre family of elliptic curves.

TBA

This is a joint work with C.Daw in progress. We study the L_{omega_1,omega}-theory of the modular functions j_n: H -> Y(n). In other words, H is seen here as the universal cover in the class of modular curves. The setting is different from one considered before by Adam Harris and Chris Daw: GL(2,Q) is given here as the sort without naming its individual elements. As usual in the study of 'pseudo-analytic cover structures', the statement of categoricity is equivalent to certain arithmetic conditions, the most challenging of which is to determine the Galois action on CM-points. This turns out to be equivalent to determining the Galois action on SL(2,\hat{Z})/(-1), that is a subgroup of

Out SL(2,\hat{Z})/(-1)   induced by the action of  Gal_Q. We find by direct matrix calculations a subgroup Out_* of the outer automorphisms group which contains the image of Gal_Q. Moreover, we prove that Out_* is the image of Drinfeld's group GT (Grothendieck-Teichmuller group) under a natural homomorphism.

It is a reasonable to conjecture that Out_* is equal to the image of Gal_Q, which would imply the categoricity statement. It follows from the above that our conjecture is a consequence of Drinfeld's conjecture which states that GT is isomorphic to Gal_Q.  

Recently in a joint work with J. Dobrowolski and N. Ramsey it is shown that in any NSOP1 theory with existence,
Kim-independence satisfies all the basic axioms over sets (except base monotonicity) that hold in simple theories with forking-independence. This is an extension of the earlier work by I. Kaplan and N. Ramsey that such hold over models in any NSOP1 theory. All simple theories; unbounded PAC fields; vector spaces over ACF with bilinear maps; the model companion of the empty theory in any language are typical NSOP1 examples.

   An important issue now is to know the existence of canonical bases. In stable and simple theories well-behaving notion of canonical bases for types over models exists, which is used in almost all the advanced studies. But there are a couple of crucial obstacles in finding canonical bases in NSOP1 theories. In this talk I will report a partial success/limit of the project. Namely, a type of a certain Morley sequence over a model has the weak canonical base. In my talk I will try to explain all the related notions.

 I will report on my recent work on dimension, definable groups, and definable fields in vector spaces over algebraically closed [real closed] fields equipped with a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form or a non-degenerate [positive-definite] symmetric bilinear form. After a brief overview of the background, I will discuss a notion of dimension and some other ingredients of the proof of the main result, which states that, in the above context, every definable group is (algebraic-by-abelian)-by-algebraic [(semialgebraic-by-abelian)-by-semialgebraic]. It follows from this result that every definable field is definable in the field of scalars, hence either finite or definably isomorphic to it [finite or algebraically closed or real closed].
 

This is joint with Gabe Conant. We give a structure theorem for finite subsets A of arbitrary groups G such that A has "small tripling" and "bounded VC dimension". Roughly, A will be a union of a bounded number of translates of a coset nilprogession of bounded rank and step (up to a small error).

I will present a conjectural picture of what a classification theory for NIP could look like, in the spirit of Shelah's classification theory for stable structures. Though most of it is speculative, there are some encouraging initial results about the lower levels of the classification, in particular concerning structures which, in some strong sense, do not contain trees.

The classification of NIP fields is a major open problem in model theory.  This talk will be an overview of an ongoing attempt to classify NIP fields of finite dp-rank.  Let $K$ be an NIP field that is neither finite nor separably closed.  Conjecturally, $K$ admits exactly one definable, valuation-type field topology (V-topology).  By work of Anscombe, Halevi, Hasson, Jahnke, and others, this conjecture implies a full classification of NIP fields.  We will sketch how this technique was used to classify fields of dp-rank 1, and what goes wrong in higher ranks.  At present, there are two main results generalizing the rank 1 case.  First, if $K$ is an NIP field of positive characteristic (and any rank), then $K$ admits at most one definable V-topology.  Second, if $K$ is an unstable NIP field of finite dp-rank (and any characteristic), then $K$ admits at least one definable V-topology.  These statements combine to yield the classification of positive characteristic fields of finite dp-rank. In characteristic 0, things go awry in a surprising way, and it becomes necessary to study a new class of "finite rank" field topologies, generalizing V-topologies.  The talk will include background information on V-topologies, NIP fields, and dp-rank.

A hereditary graph property is a class of finite graphs closed under isomorphism and induced subgraphs.  Given a hereditary graph property H, the speed of H is the function which sends an integer n to the number of distinct elements in H with underlying set {1,...,n}.  Not just any function can occur as the speed of hereditary graph property.  Specifically, there are discrete ``jumps" in the possible speeds.  Study of these jumps began with work of Scheinerman and Zito in the 90's, and culminated in a series of papers from the 2000's by Balogh, Bollob\'{a}s, and Weinreich, in which essentially all possible speeds of a hereditary graph property were characterized.  In contrast to this, many aspects of this problem in the hypergraph setting remained unknown.  In this talk we present new hypergraph analogues of many of the jumps from the graph setting, specifically those involving the polynomial, exponential, and factorial speeds.  The jumps in the factorial range turned out to have surprising connections to the model theoretic notion of mutual algebricity, which we also discuss.  This is joint work with Chris Laskowski.

 This is a longstanding problem. We will present candidate axioms that we believe form a complete axiom system satisfied by $F_p^{alg}((t))$.  A currently "unfinished" proof will be discussed.   This work is joint with Françoise Delon (Paris) and Arno Fehm (Dresden).

We will provide a general overview on some recent work on non-archimedean parametrizations and their applications. We will start by presenting our work with Cluckers and Comte on the existence of good Yomdin-Gromov parametrizations in the non-archimedean context and a $p$-adic Pila-Wilkie theorem.   We will then explain how this is used in our work with Chambert-Loir to prove bialgebraicity results in products of Mumford curves. 
 

 In Classification Theory, Shelah defined several cardinal invariants of a complete theory which detect the presence of certain trees among the definable sets, which in turn quantify the complexity of forking.  In later model-theoretic developments, local versions of these invariants were recognized as marking important dividing lines - e.g. simplicity and NTP2.  Around these dividing lines, a dichotomy theorem of Shelah states that a theory has the tree property if and only if it is witnessed in one of two extremal forms--the tree property of the first or second kind--and it was asked if there is a 'quantitative' analogue of this dichotomy in the form of a certain equation among these invariants.  We will describe these model-theoretic invariants and explain why the quantitative version of the dichotomy fails, via a construction that relies upon some unexpected tools from combinatorial set theory. 

 

 

Given a finite set X, is an easy exercise to show that a binary operation * from XxX to X which is injective in each variable separately, and which is also associative, makes (X,*) into a group. Hrushovski and others have asked what happens if * is only partially associative - do we still get something resembling a group? The answer is known to be yes (in a strong sense) if almost all triples satisfy the associative law. In joint work with Tim Gowers, we consider the so-called `1%' regime, in which we only have an epsilon fraction of triples satisfying the associative law. In this regime, the answer turns out to be rather more subtle, involving certain group-like structures which we call rough approximate groups. I will discuss these objects, and try to give a sense of how they arise, by describing a somewhat combinatorial interpretation of partial associativity.
 

We take a look at difference fields with several commuting automorphisms. The theory of difference fields with one distinguished automorphism has a model companion known as ACFA, which Zoe Chatzidakis and Ehud Hrushovski have studied in depth. However, Hrushovski has proved that if you look at fields with two or more commuting automorphisms, then the existentially closed models of the theory do not form a first order model class. We introduce a non-elementary framework for studying them. We then discuss how to generalise a result of Kowalski and Pillay that every definable group (in ACFA) virtually embeds into an algebraic group. This is joint work in progress with Zoe Chatzidakis and Nick Ramsey.

   It is a long-standing open problem whether the ring of integers Z has an existential first-order definition in Q, the field of rational numbers. A few years ago, Jochen Koenigsmann proved that Z has a universal first-order definition in Q, building on earlier work by Bjorn Poonen. This result was later generalised to number fields by Jennifer Park and to global function fields of odd characteristic by Kirsten Eisenträger and Travis Morrison, who used classical machinery from number theory and class field theory related to the behaviour of quaternion algebras over global and local fields.

   In this talk, I will sketch a variation on the techniques used to obtain the aforementioned results. It allows for a relatively short and uniform treatment of global fields of all characteristics that is significantly less dependent on class field theory. Instead, a central role is played by Hilbert's Reciprocity Law for quaternion algebras. I will conclude with an example of a non-global set-up where the existence of a reciprocity law similarly yields universal definitions of certain subrings.

I will be talking of recent results by Ayse Berkman and myself, as well as about a more general program of research in this area.

I will present joint work with A. Pillay on the theory of NIP formulas in arbitrary groups, which exhibit a local formulation of the notion of finitely satisfiable generics (as defined by Hrushovski, Peterzil, and Pillay). This setting generalizes ``local stable group theory" (i.e., the study of stable formulas in groups) and also the case of arbitrary NIP formulas in pseudofinite groups. Time permitting, I will mention an application of these results in additive combinatorics.

I will present Pila's Modular Zilber-Pink with Derivatives (MZPD) conjecture, which is a Zilber-Pink type statement for the j-function and its derivatives, and discuss some weak and functional/differential analogues. In particular, I will define special varieties in each setting and explain the relationship between them. I will then show how one can prove the aforementioned weak/functional/differential MZPD statements using the Ax-Schanuel theorem for the j-function and its derivatives and some basic complex analytic geometry. Note that I gave a similar talk in Oxford last year (where I discussed a differential MZPD conjecture and proved it assuming an Existential Closedness conjecture for j), but this talk is going to be significantly different from that one (the approach presented in this talk will be mostly complex analytic rather than differential algebraic, and the results will be unconditional).

In this talk I will explain a category theoretic perspective on geometry.  Starting with a category of local objects (of and algebraic nature), and a (Grothendieck) 
topology on it, one can define global objects such as schemes and stacks. Examples of this  approach are algebraic, analytic, differential geometries and also more exotic geometries  such as analytic and differential geometry over the integers and analytic geometry over  the field with one element. In this approach the notion of a point is not primary but is  derived from the local to global structure. The Zariski and Huber spectra are recovered  in this way, and we also get new spectra which might be of interest in model theory.

In 1996 using techniques from model theory and intersection theory, Hrushovski obtained a generalisation of the Lang-Weil estimates. Subsequently the estimates have found applications in group theory, algebraic dynamics and algebraic geometry. We shall discuss a geometric proof of the non-uniform version of these estimates.

I will give an introduction to the theory of definable parameterization of definable sets in the o-minimal context and its application to diophantine problems. I will then go on to discuss uniformity issues with particular reference to the subanalytic case. This is joint work with Jonathan Pila and Raf Cluckers

In the spirit of the Ax-Kochen-Ershov principle, one could conjecture that the imaginaries in equicharacteristic zero Henselian fields can be entirely classified in terms of the Haskell-Hrushovski-Macpherson geometric imaginaries, residue field imaginaries and value group imaginaries. However, the situation is more complicated than that. My goal in this talk will be to present what we believe to be an optimal conjecture and give elements of a proof.

The well known (and notoriously hard) P vs NP problem asks whether every Boolean function with polynomial-size proofs is also computable in
polynomial time.

The standard approach to the P vs NP problem is via circuit complexity. For progressively richer classes of Boolean circuits (networks of AND, OR and NOT
logic gates), one wishes to show super-polynomial lower bounds on the sizes of circuits (as a function of the size of the input) computing some Boolean
function known to be in NP, such as the Satisfiability problem.

However, there is a more logic-oriented approach initiated by Cook and Reckhow, going through proof complexity rather than circuit complexity. For
progressively richer proof systems, one wishes to show super-polynomial lower bounds on the sizes of proofs (as a function of the size of the tautology) of
some sequence of propositional tautologies.

I will give a brief overview on known results along these two directions, and on their limitations. Somewhat surprisingly, similar techniques have been found
to be useful for these seemingly different approaches. I will say something about known connections between the approaches, and pose the question of
whether there are deeper connections.

Finally, I will discuss how the perspective of proof complexity can be used to formalize the difficulty of proving lower bounds on the sizes of computations
(or of proofs).

 

Let $p$ be a fixed prime number and let $SCVF_p$ be the theory of separably closed non-trivially valued fields of
characteristic $p$. In the talk, we will see that, in many ways, the step from $ACVF_{p,p}$ to $SCVF_p$ is not more
complicated than the one from $ACF_p$ to $SCF_p$.

At a basic level, this is true for quantifier elimination (Delon), for which it suffices to add parametrized $p$-coordinate
functions to any of the usual languages for valued fields. It follows that all completions are NIP.

At a more sophisticated level, in finite degree of imperfection, when a $p$-basis is named or when one just works with
Hasse derivations, the imaginaries of $SCVF_p$ are not more complicated than the ones in $ACVF_{p,p}$, i.e., they are
classified by the geometric sorts of Haskell-Hrushovski-Macpherson. The latter is proved using prolongations. One may
also use these to characterize the stable part and the stably dominated types in $SCVF_p$, and to show metastability.

If G is a topological group, a G-flow X is a non-empty, compact, Hausdorff space on which G acts continuously; it is minimal if all G-orbits are dense. By a theorem of Ellis, there is a (unique) minimal G-flow M(G) which is universal: there is a continuous G-map to every other G-flow. 

Here, we will be interested in the case where G = Aut(K) for some structure K, usually omega-categorical. Work of Kechris, Pestov and Todorcevic and others gives conditions on K under which structural Ramsey Theory (due to Nesetril - Rodl and others) can be used to compute M(G). 

In the first part of the talk I will give a description of the above theory and when it applies (the 'tame case'). In the second part, I will describe joint work with J. Hubicka and J. Nesetril which shows that the omega-categorical structures constructed in the late 1980's by Hrushovski as counterexamples to Lachlan's conjecture are not tame and moreover, minimal flows of their automorphism groups have rather different properties to those in the tame case. 

 The talk is about the normal modal logics of elementary classes defined by first-order formulas of the form
 'for all x_0 there exist x_1, ..., x_n phi(x_0, x_1, ... x_n)' with phi being a conjunction of binary atoms.
 I'll show that many properties of these logics, such as finite axiomatisability,
 elementarity,  axiomatisability by a set of canonical formulas or by a single generalised Sahlqvist formula,
 together with modal definability of the initial formula, either simultaneously hold or simultaneously do not hold.
 

Starting with a countable transitive model of V=L, we show that by 
adding a single Cohen real, c, most intermediate models do no satisfy choice. In 
fact, most intermediate models to L[c] are not even definable.

The key part of the proof is the Bristol model, which is intermediate to L[c], 
but is not constructible from a set. We will give a broad explanation of the 
construction of the Bristol model within the constraints of time.

Here Z is Zermelo’s set theory of 1908, as later formulated: full separation, but no replacement or collection among its axioms. PROVI was presented in lectures in Cambridge in 2010 and later published with improvements by Nathan Bowler, and is, I claim, the weakest subsystem of ZF to support a recognisable theory of set forcing: PROV is PROVI shorn of its axiom of infinity. The provident sets are the transitive non-empty models of PROV. The talk will begin with a presentation of PROV, and then discuss more recent applications and problems: in particular an answer in the system Z + PROV to a question posed by Eugene Wesley in 1972 will be sketched, and two proofs (fallacious, I hope) of 0 = 1 will be given, one using my slim models of Z and the other applying the Spector–Gandy theorem to certain models of PROVI. These “proofs”, when re-interpreted, supply some arguments of Reverse Mathematics.

NSOP1 is a class of first order theories containing simple theories, which contains many natural examples that somehow slip-out of the simple context.

As in simple theories, NSOP1 theories admit a natural notion of independence dubbed Kim-independence, which generalizes non-forking in simple theories and satisfies many of its properties.

In this talk I will explain all these notions, and in particular talk about recent progress (joint with Nick Ramsey) in the study of Kim-independence, showing transitivity and several consequences.

We survey recent research related to the Extension Property of Partial Isomorhisms (EPPA, also known as Hrushovski property) and, perhaps surprisingly, relate it to structural Ramsey theory.   This is based on a joint work with David Evans, Jan Hubicka and Matej Konecny.
 

Traditionally, logic was thought of as `principles of right reason'. Early twentieth century philosophy of mathematics focused on the problem of a general foundation for all mathematics. In contrast, the last 70 years have seen model theory develop as the study and comparison of formal theories for studying specific areas of mathematics. While this shift began in work of Tarski, Robinson, Henkin, Vaught, and Morley, the decisive step came with Shelah's stability theory. After this paradigm shift there is a systematic search for a short set of syntactic conditions which divide first order theories into disjoint classes such that models of different theories in the same class have similar mathematical properties. This classification of theories makes more precise the idea of a `tame structure'. Thus, logic (specifically model theory) becomes a tool for organizing and doing mathematics with consequences for combinatorics, diophantine geometry, differential equations and other fields. I will present an account of the last 70 years in model theory that illustrates this shift. This reports material in my recent book published by Cambridge: Formalization without Foundationalism: Model Theory and the Philosophy of Mathematical Practice.

With Gianluca Paolini (in preparation), we constructed, using a variant on the Hrushovski dimension function, for every k ≥ 3, 2^µ families of strongly minimal Steiner k systems. We study the mathematical properties of these counterexamples to Zilber’s trichotomy conjecture rather than thinking of them as merely exotic examples. In particular the long study of finite Steiner systems in reflected in results that depend on the block size k. A quasigroup is a structure with a binary operation such that for each equation xy = z the values of two of the variables determines a unique value for the third. The new Steiner 3-systems are bi-interpretable with strongly minimal Steiner quasigroups. For k > 3, we show the pure k-Steiner systems have ‘essentially unary definable closure’ and do not interpret a quasigroup. But we show that for q a prime power the Steiner q systems can be interpreted into specific sorts of quasigroups, block algebras. We extend the notion of an (a, b)-cycle graph arising in the study of finite and infinite Stein triple systems (e.g Cameron-Webb) by introducing what we call the (a, b)-path graph of a block algebra. We exhibit theories of strongly minimal block algebras where all (a, b)-paths are infinite and others in which all are finite only in the prime model. We show how to obtain combinatorial properties (e.g. 2-transitivity) by the either varying the basic collection of finite partial Steiner systems or modifying the µ function which ensures strong minimality

I will discuss joint work with Gismatullin, Halupczok, and Simonetta on the following problem: given a henselian valued field of characteristic 0, possibly equipped with analytic structure (in the sense stemming originally from Denef and van den Dries), describe the possibilities for a definable group G in the valued field sort which is definably almost simple, that is, has no proper infinite definable normal subgroups. We also have results for an algebraically closed valued field K in characteristic p, but assuming also that the group is a definable subgroup of GL(n, K).

I will explain how complex varieties which have asymptotically large intersections with finite grids can be seen to correspond to projective geometries, exploiting ideas of Hrushovski. I will describe how this leads to a precise characterisation of such varieties. Time permitting, I will discuss consequences for generalised sum-product estimates and connections to diophantine problems. This is joint work with Emmanuel Breuillard.

abstract:

In my talk I shall try to explain the following speculation and present some
evidence in the form of "correlations" between categoricity conjectures in
model theory and motivic conjectures in algebraic geometry.

Transfinite induction constructions developed in model theory are by now
sufficiently developed to be used to build analogues of objects in algebraic
geometry constructed with a choice of topology, such as a singular cohomology theory,
the Hodge decomposition, and fundamental groups of complex algebraic varieties.
Moreover, these algebraic geometric objects are often conjectured to satisfy
homogeneity or freeness properties which are true for objects constructed by
transfinite induction.


An example of this is Hrushovski fusion used to build Zilber pseudoexponentiation,
i.e. a group homomorphism  $ex:C^+ \to C^*$ which satisfies Schanuel conjecture,
a transcendence property analogous to Grothendieck conjecture on periods.


I shall also present a precise conjecture on "uniqueness" of Q-forms (comparison isomorphisms)
of complex etale cohomology, and will try to explain its relation to conjectures on l-adic
Galois representations coming from the theory of motivic Galois group.
 

In 1985, Babai and Sós asked whether there exists a constant c>0 such that every finite group of order n has a product-free set of size at least cn, where a product-free set of a group is a subset that does not contain three elements x,y and z  satisfying xy=z. Gowers showed that the answer is no in the early 2000s, by linking the existence of product-free sets of large density to the existence of low dimensional unitary representations.

In this talk, I will provide an answer to the aforementioned question by model theoretic means. Furthermore, I will relate some of Gowers' results to the existence of nontrivial definable compactifications of nonstandard finite groups.
 

 
We study continuous theories of classes of finite dimensional Hilbert spaces expanded by 
a finite family (of a fixed size) of unitary operators. 
Infinite dimensional models of these theories are called pseudo finite dimensional dynamical Hilbert spaces. 
Our main results connect decidability questions of these theories with the topic of approximations of groups by metric groups. 

This is a survey on recent advances in classical decidability issues for local and global fields and for some canonical infinite extensions of those.

Abstract: The universal algorithm is a Turing machine program that can in principle enumerate any finite sequence of numbers, if run in the right model of PA, and furthermore, can always enumerate any desired extension of that sequence in a suitable end-extension of that model. The universal finite set is a set-theoretic analogue, a locally verifiable definition that can in principle define any finite set, in the right model of set theory, and can always define any desired finite extension of that set in a suitable top-extension of that model. Recent work has uncovered a $\Sigma_1$-definable version that works with respect to end-extensions. I shall give an account of all three results, which have a parallel form, and describe applications to the model theory of arithmetic and set theory. Post questions and commentary on my blog at http://jdh.hamkins.org/parallels-in-universality-oxford-math-logic-semi…;

Both in the real and in the p-adic case, I will talk about recent results about C^r-parameterizations and their diophantine applications.  In both cases, the dependence on r of the number of parameterizing C^r maps plays a role. In the non-archimedean case, we get as an application new bounds for rational points of bounded height lying on algebraic varieties defined over finite fields, sharpening the bounds by Sedunova, and making them uniform in the finite field. In the real case, some results from joint work with Pila and Wilkie, and also beyond this work, will be presented, 
in relation to several questions raised by Yomdin. The non-archimedean case is joint work with Forey and Loeser. The real case is joint work with Pila and Wilkie, continued by my PhD student S. Van Hille.  Some work with Binyamini and Novikov in the non-archimedean context will also be mentioned. The relations with questions by Yomdin is joint work with Friedland and Yomdin. 

In joint work with Gareths Boxall and Jones we prove a poly-logarithmic bound for the number of rational points on the graph of functions on the disc that exhibit a certain decay. I will present an application of this counting theorem to the arithmetic of dynamical systems. It concerns fields generated by the solutions of equations of the form $P^{\circ n}(z) = P^{\circ n}(y)$ for a polynomial $P$ of degree $D \geq 2$ where $y$ is a fixed algebraic number. The general goal is to show that the degree of such fields grows like a power of $D^n$.    

This lecture will give a brief review of the theory of non-abelian reciprocity maps and their applications to Diophantine geometry, and pose some questions for model-theorists.
 

Several works (by Kontsevich, Soibelman, Berkovich, Nicaise, Boucksom, Jonsson...) have shown that the limit behavior of a one-parameter family $(X_t)$ of complex algebraic varieties can often be described using the associated Berkovich t-adic analytic space $X^b$. In a work in progress with E. Hrushovski and F. Loeser, we provide a new instance of this general phenomenon. Suppose we are given for every t an  $(n,n)$-form $ω_t$ on $X_t$ (for n= dim X). Then under some assumptions on the formula that describes $ω_t$, the family $(ω_t)$ has a "limit" ω, which is a real valued  (n,n)-form in the sense of Chambert-Loir and myself on the Berkovich space $X^b$, and the integral of $ω_t$ on $X_t$ tends to the integral of ω on $X^b$. 
In this talk I will first make some reminders about Berkovich spaces and (n,n)-forms in this setting, and then discuss the above result. 
In fact, as I will explain, it is more convenient to formulate it with  $(X_t)$ seen as a single algebraic variety over a non-standard model *C of C and (ω_t) as a (n,n) differential form on this variety. The field *C also carries a t-adic real valuation which makes it a model of ACVF (and enables to do Berkovich geometry on it), and our proof uses repeatedly RCF and ACVF theories. 
 

I will report on two recent papers with D. Ghioca and U. Zannier (joined by P. Corvaja and F. Hu, respectively) in which we consider variants of the Mordell-Lang conjecture.  In the first of these, we study the dynamical Mordell-Lang conjecture in positive characteristic, proving some instances, but also showing that in general the problem is at least as hard as a difficult diophantine problem over the integers.  In the second paper, we study the Mordell-Lang problem for extensions of abelian varieties by the additive group.  Here we have positive results in the function field case obtained by using the socle theorem in the form offered as an aside in Hrushovski's 1996 paper and in the number field case we relate this problem to the Bombieri-Lang conjecture.

I will present a variation of positive model theory which addresses the issues of approximations of conventional geometric structures by sequences of Zariski structures as well as approximation by sequences of finite structures. In particular I am interested in applications to quantum mechanics.

I will report on a progress in defining and calculating oscillating in- tegrals of importance in quantum physics. This is based on calculating Gauss sums of order higher or equal to 2 over rings Z/mZ for very specific m.