7 years ago, also in Oxford, Sylvy Anscombe and I asked this question, which is part of the general effort to try and understand the model theory of henselian valued fields through dividing lines. In 2024, Sylvy Anscombe and Franziska Jahnke completely classified NIP henselian valued fields. Their methods can be extended, with the help of works of Chernikov, Kaplan and Simon and of Kuhlmann and Rzepka, to NTP2 henselian valued fields, obtaining the following:

• if a henselian valued field is NTP2, then it is semitame and its residue field is NTP2;
• if a henselian valued field is separably algebraically maximal Kaplansky and its residue field is NTP2, then it is NTP2.

This covers a large class of fields, but there is still a gap. Notably, Fp((Q)) is in the middle: it is semitame but not Kaplansky.

To answer this question, we studied so called tame henselian fields with finite residue field, and derived quantifier elimination results, namely, we prove that any formula in the language of valued fields reduces to a formula of the form (∃y f(x,y)=0) ∧ φ(v(x)) ∧ ψ(res(x)), where φ and ψ are formulas in the language of ordered groups and of rings, respectively.

In Fp((Q)) specifically, the valuation ring itself is definable with a diophantine formula (ie of the form ∃y f(x,y)=0), reducing further our quantifier elimination result.

Finally, a large chunk of these formulas are known to be NTP2: when f(x,y) is additive in y, the formula ∃y f(x,y)=z is NTP2 (with respect to x and z). Unfortunately, that does not cover all formulas, so the answer to the titular question is still unknown.

One can learn a lot about a compact manifold if one can show that it fibres over the circle - in essence, this allows us to view a static n-dimensional manifold as a manifold of dimension n-1 that evolves in time.Being fibred (over the circle) is a relatively rare property. It is much more common to be virtually fibred, that is, to admit a finite cover that is fibred. For example, it was the content of a conjecture of William Thurston, now two theorems by Ian Agol and Dani Wise, that all finite-volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds are virtually fibred; in fact, this property is extremely common among irreducible 3-manifolds.The situation is less clear in higher dimensions. On the obstruction side, we know that virtually fibred manifolds must have vanishing Euler characteristic. This immediately shows that compact hyperbolic manifolds in even dimensions will not be virtually fibred. A more involved obstruction comes from L2-homology: virtually fibred manifolds must be L2-acyclic. The motivation behind the research I will present lies in trying to find situations in which the vanishing of L2-homology is is not only necessary, but also sufficient for virtual fibring. It turns our that a lot more can be said if we replace aspherical manifolds by their homological cousins: Poincare duality groups. Concretely, if G is an n-dimensional Poincare-duality group over the rationals, and if G satisfies the RFRS property, then G is L2-acyclic if and only if there is a finite-index subgroup G0 of G and an epimorphism from G0 onto the integers such that its kernel is a Poincare-duality group over the rationals of dimension n-1. (This last theorem is joint with Sam Fisher and Giovanni Italiano.)The RFRS property was introduced in Agol's work on Thurston's conjecture. A countable group is RFRS if and only if it is residually {virtually abelian and poly-Z}. All compact special groups in the sense of Haglund-Wise satisfy this property, so there is a ready supply of RFRS groups, also among fundamental groups of hyperbolic manifolds in high dimensions.

The talk gives some survey about recent applications of finitely additive measures to Lebesgue integrable functions. After a short introduction to such measures and related integrals, purely finitely additive measures are of particular interest. Special examples are given and, as a first application, an integral representation for the precise representative of Lebesgue integrable functions is provided. Then, based on a general approach to traces, a new version of the Gauss-Green formula is introduced, where neither a pointwise trace nor a pointwise normal is needed on the boundary. This allows e.g. the treatment of inner boundaries and of concentrations on the boundary. A second boundary integral is used to handle singularities that hadnot been accessible before. Finally, weak versions of differentiability for Lebesgue integrable functions are discussed, a mean value formula for a class of Sobolev functions is given, and a new approach to the generalized derivatives in the sense of Clarke is provided.