Tue, 17 Jan 2017

14:15 - 15:15
L4

Endo-parameters and the Local Langlands Correspondence for classical groups

Shaun Stevens
(University of East Anglia)
Abstract

The local Langlands correspondence for classical groups gives a natural finite-to-one map between certain representations of p-adic classical groups and certain self-dual representations of the absolute Weil group of a p-adic field (and more). On both sides of the correspondence, the description of the representations involves a ``wild part'' of more arithmetic nature and a ``tame part'' of more geometric nature, and the notion of endo-parameter (due to Bushnell--Henniart for general linear groups) is designed to describe the ``wild part'' of the Langlands correspondence. I will explain what this means and the connection with representations of affine Hecke algebras. This is joint work with Blondel--Henniart, with Lust, and with Kurinczuk--Skodlerack.

Tue, 17 Jan 2017

12:00 - 13:15
L4

Polylogarithmic Polygon Origami

Lance Dixon
(Stanford)
Abstract

Amplitudes in planar N=4 SYM are dual to light-like polygonal Wilson-loop expectation values. In many cases their perturbative expansion can be expressed in terms of multiple polylogarithms which also obey certain single-valuedness conditions or branch cut restrictions. The rigidity of this function space, together with a few other conditions, allows one to construct the six-point amplitude -- or hexagonal Wilson loop -- through at least five loops, and the seven-point amplitude through 3.5 loops. Then one can "fold" the polygonal Wilson loops into multiple degenerate configurations, expressing the limiting behavior in terms of simpler function spaces, and learning in the process about how amplitudes factorize.
 

Mon, 16 Jan 2017

16:00 - 17:00
L4

A survey of discrete analogues in harmonic analysis

Kevin Hughes
(University of Bristol)
Abstract

In this talk we will motivate and discuss several problems and results in harmonic analysis that involve some arithmetic or discrete structure. We will focus on pioneering work of Bourgain on discrete restriction theorems and pointwise ergodic theorems for arithmetic sets, their modern developments and future directions for the field.

Mon, 16 Jan 2017

15:45 - 16:45
L6

Coarse embeddings, and how to avoid them

David Hume
(Oxford)
Abstract

Coarse embeddings occur completely naturally in geometric group theory: every finitely generated subgroup of a finitely generated group is coarsely embedded. Since even very nice classes of groups - hyperbolic groups or right-angled Artin groups for example - are known to have 'wild' collections of subgroups, there are precious few invariants that one may use to prove a statement of the form '$H$ does not coarsely embed into $G$' for two finitely generated groups $G,H$.
The growth function and the asymptotic dimension are two coarse invariants which which have been extensively studied, and a more recent invariant is the separation profile of Benjamini-Schramm-Timar.

In this talk I will describe a new spectrum of coarse invariants, which include both the separation profile and the growth function, and can be used to tackle many interesting problems, for instance: Does there exist a coarse embedding of the Baumslag-Solitar group $BS(1,2)$ or the lamplighter group $\mathbb{Z}_2\wr\mathbb{Z}$ into a hyperbolic group?

This is part of an ongoing collaboration with John Mackay and Romain Tessera.
 

Mon, 16 Jan 2017

14:15 - 15:15
L4

Invariants and moduli revisited: the case of a single root

Brent Doran
Abstract

What is the correct combinatorial object to encode a linear representation?  Many shadows of this problem have been studied:moment polytopes, Duistermaat-Heckman measures, Okounkov bodies.  We suggest that already in very simple cases these miss a crucial feature.  The ring theory, as opposed to just the linear algebra, of the group action on the coordinate ring, depends on some non-trivial lattice geometry and an associated filtration.  Some striking similarities to, and key differences from, the theory of toric varieties ensue.  Finite and non-finite generation phenomena emerge naturally.  We discuss motivations from, and applications to, questions in the effective geometry of moduli of curves.

 

Mon, 16 Jan 2017

12:45 - 13:45
L3

The null string origin of the ambitwistor string

Eduardo Casali
(Oxford)
Abstract

The ambitwistor string of Mason and Skinner has been very successful in describing field theory amplitudes, at both loop and tree-level for a variety of theories. But the original action given by Mason and Skinner is already partially gauge-fixed, which obscures some issues related to modular invariance and the connection to conventional string theories. In this talk I will argue that the Null string is the ungauge-fixed version of the Ambitwistor string. This clarifies the geometry of the original Ambitwistor string and gives a road map to understanding modular invariance, and gives new formulas for loop amplitudes in which we expect that UV divergences will be easier to analyse.

 
 
Thu, 12 Jan 2017
14:00
L5

Tight Optimality and Convexity Conditions for Piecewise Smooth Functions

Prof. Andreas Griewank
(Yachay Tech University)
Abstract

 Functions defined by evaluation programs involving smooth  elementals and absolute values as well as max and min are piecewise smooth. For this class we present first and second order, necessary and sufficient conditions for the functions to be locally optimal, or convex, or at least possess a supporting hyperplane. The conditions generalize the classical KKT and SSC theory and are constructive; though in the case of convexity they may be combinatorial to verify. As a side product we find that, under the Mangasarin-Fromowitz-Kink-Qualification, the well established nonsmooth concept of subdifferential regularity is equivalent to first order convexity. All results are based on piecewise linearization and suggest corresponding optimization algorithms.

Thu, 15 Dec 2016

17:00 - 18:00
L1

Oxford Mathematics Christmas Public Lecture: The Mathematics of Visual Illusions - Ian Stewart SOLD OUT

Ian Stewart
(University of Warwick)
Abstract

Puzzling things happen in human perception when ambiguous or incomplete information is presented to the eyes. Rivalry occurs when two different images, presented one to each eye, lead to alternating percepts, possibly of neither image separately. Illusions, or multistable figures, occur when a single image can be perceived in several ways. The Necker cube is the most famous example. Impossible objects arise when a single image has locally consistent but globally inconsistent geometry. Famous examples are the Penrose triangle and etchings by Maurits Escher.

In this lecture Ian Stewart will demonstrate how these phenomena provide clues about the workings of the visual system, with reference to recent research in the field which has modelled simplified, systematic methods by which the brain can make decisions. In these models a neural network is designed to interpret incoming sensory data in terms of previously learned patterns. Rivalry occurs when different interpretations are confused, and illusions arise when the same data have several interpretations.

The lecture will be non-technical and highly illustrated, with plenty of examples.

Please email @email to register