Veering triangulations are a special class of ideal triangulations with a rather mysterious combinatorial definition. Their importance follows from a deep connection with pseudo-Anosov flows on 3-manifolds. Recently Landry, Minsky and Taylor introduced a polynomial invariant of veering triangulations called the taut polynomial. It is a generalisation of an older invariant, the Teichmüller polynomial, defined by McMullen in 2002.

The aim of my talk is to demonstrate that veering triangulations provide a convenient setup for computations. More precisely, I will use fairly easy arguments to obtain a fairly strong statement which generalises the results of McMullen relating the Teichmüller polynomial to the Alexander polynomial.

I will not assume any prior knowledge on the Alexander polynomial, the Teichmüller polynomial or veering triangulations.

Leighton's Theorem states that if two finite graphs have a common universal cover then they have a common finite cover. I will explore various ways in which this result can and can't be extended.

'Quasi-isometric rigidity' in group theory is the slogan for questions of the following nature: let A be some class of groups (e.g. finitely presented groups). Suppose an abstract group H is quasi-isometric to a group in A: does it imply that H is in A? Such statements link the coarse geometry of a group with its algebraic structure. 

Much is known in the case A is some class of lattices in a given Lie group. I will present classical results and outline ideas in their proofs, emphasizing the geometric nature of the proofs. I will focus on one key ingredient, the quasi-flat rigidity, and discuss some geometric objects that come into play, such as neutered spaces, asymptotic cones and buildings. I will end the talk with recent developments and possible generalizations of these results and ideas.

I will explain what it means for a manifold to have an affine structure and give an introduction to Benzecri's theorem stating that a closed surface admits an affine structure if and only if its Euler characteristic vanishes. I will also talk about an algebraic-topological generalization, due to Milnor and Wood, that bounds the Euler class of a flat circle bundle. No prior familiarity with the concepts is necessary.