Fri, 31 May 2019

16:00 - 17:00
L1

Careers beyond academia

Katia Babbar (AI Wealth Technologies & QuantBright), Jara Imbers (Risk Management Solutions) and Tom Hawes (Smith Institute)
Abstract

A panel discussion on non-academic careers for mathematicians with PhDs, featuring Katia Babbar (AI Wealth Technologies & QuantBright), Jara Imbers (Risk Management Solutions) and Tom Hawes (Smith Institute).
 

Fri, 31 May 2019

14:00 - 15:00
L3

Algorithmic generation of physiologically realistic patterns of fibrosis in the heart

Professor Kevin Burrage
(School of Mathematical Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane)
Abstract

Cardiac fibrosis plays a significant role in the disruption of healthy electrical signalling in the heart, creating structural heterogeneities that induce and stabilise arrhythmia.  However, a proper understanding of the consequences of cardiac fibrosis must take into account the complex and highly variable patterns of its spatial localisation in the heart, which significantly affects the extent and manner of its impacts on cardiac wave propagation. In this work we present a methodology for the algorithmic generation of fibrotic patterns via Perlin noise, a technique for computationally efficient generation of textures in computer graphics.

Our approach works directly from image data to create populations of pattern realisations that all resemble the target image under a set of metrics. Our technique thus serves as a type of data enrichment, enabling analysis of how variability in the precise placement of fibrotic structures modulates their electrophysiological impact. We demonstrate our method, and the types of analysis it can enable, using a widely referenced histological image of four different types of microfibrotic structure. Our generator and Bayesian tuning method prove flexible enough to successfully capture each of these very distinct patterns.

We demonstrate the importance of this tool, by presenting 2D simulations overlayed on the generated images that highlight the effects of microscopic variability on the electrophysiological impact of fibrosis. Finally, we discuss the application of our methodology to the increasingly available imaging data of fibrotic patterning on a more macroscopic scale, and indeed to other areas of science underpinned by image based modelling and simulation.    

Fri, 31 May 2019

12:00 - 13:00
L4

A Nonlinear Spectral Method for Network Core-Periphery Detection

Desmond Higham
(University of Edinburgh)
Abstract

Dimension reduction is an overarching theme in data science: we enjoy finding informative patterns, features or substructures in large, complex data sets. Within the field of network science, an important problem of this nature is to identify core-periphery structure. Given a network, our task is to assign each node to either the core or periphery. Core nodes should be strongly connected across the whole network whereas peripheral nodes should be strongly connected only to core nodes. More generally, we may wish to assign a non-negative value to each node, with a larger value indicating greater "coreness." This type of problem is related to, but distinct from, commumnity detection (finding clusters) and centrality assignment (finding key players), and it arises naturally in the study of networks in social science and finance. We derive and analyse a new iterative algorithm for detecting network core-periphery structure.

Using techniques in nonlinear Perron-Frobenius theory we prove global convergence to the unique solution of a relaxed version of a natural discrete optimization problem. On sparse networks, the cost of each iteration scales linearly with the number of nodes, making the algorithm feasible for large-scale problems. We give an alternative interpretation of the algorithm from the perspective of maximum likelihood reordering of a new logistic core--periphery random graph model. This viewpoint also gives a new basis for quantitatively judging a core--periphery detection algorithm. We illustrate the algorithm on a range of synthetic and real networks, and show that it offers advantages over the current state-of-the-art.

This is joint work with Francesco Tudisco (Strathclyde)

Fri, 31 May 2019

10:00 - 11:00
L3

An optimal control approach to Formula 1 lap simulation

Mike Beeson, Matt Davidson and James Rogers
(Racing Point F1)
Abstract

In Formula 1 engineers strive to produce the fastest car possible for their drivers. A lap simulation provides an objective evaluation of the performance of the car and the subsequent lap time achieved. Using this information, engineers aim to test new car concepts, determine performance limitations or compromises, and identify the sensitivity of performance to car setup parameters.

The latest state of the art lap simulation techniques use optimal control approaches. Optimisation methods are employed to derive the optimal control inputs of the car that achieve the fastest lap time within the constraints of the system. The resulting state trajectories define the complete behaviour of the car. Such approaches aim to create more robust, realistic and powerful simulation output compared to traditional methods.

In this talk we discuss our latest work in this area. A dynamic vehicle model is used within a free-trajectory solver based on direct optimal control methods. We discuss the reasons behind our design choices, our progress to date, and the issues we have faced during development. Further, we look at the short and long term aims of our project and how we wish to develop our mathematical methods in the future.

Thu, 30 May 2019

16:00 - 17:00
L6

Fourier expansions at cusps and the Manin constant of elliptic curves

Michalis Neururer
(TU Darmstadt)
Abstract

I will discuss the arithmetic significance of Fourier expansions of modular forms at cusps. I will talk about joint work with F. Brunault, where we determine the number field generated by Fourier coefficients of newforms at a cusp. Then I will discuss joint work with A. Saha and K. Česnavičius where we find denominator bounds for Fourier expansions at cusps and apply these bounds to a conjecture on the Manin constants of elliptic curves.

Thu, 30 May 2019

16:00 - 17:30
L4

Adapted Wasserstein distances and their role in mathematical finance

Julio Backhoff
(University of Vienna)
Abstract

The problem of model uncertainty in financial mathematics has received considerable attention in the last years. In this talk I will follow a non-parametric point of view, and argue that an insightful approach to model uncertainty should not be based on the familiar Wasserstein distances. I will then provide evidence supporting the better suitability of the recent notion of adapted Wasserstein distances (also known as Nested Distances in the literature). Unlike their more familiar counterparts, these transport metrics take the role of information/filtrations explicitly into account. Based on joint work with M. Beiglböck, D. Bartl and M. Eder.

Thu, 30 May 2019

16:00 - 17:30
L3

Likely instabilities in stochastic hyperelastic solids

Angela Mihai
(Cardiff University)
Abstract

Likely instabilities in stochastic hyperelastic solids

L. Angela Mihai

School of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff, CF24 4AG, UK

E-mail: @email.uk

 

Nonlinear elasticity has been an active topic of fundamental and applied research for several decades. However, despite numerous developments and considerable attention it has received, there are important issues that remain unresolved, and many aspects still elude us. In particular, the quantification of uncertainties in material parameters and responses resulting from incomplete information remain largely unexplored. Nowadays, it is becoming increasingly apparent that deterministic approaches, which are based on average data values, can greatly underestimate, or overestimate, mechanical properties of many materials. Thus, stochastic representations, accounting for data dispersion, are needed to improve assessment and predictions. In this talk, I will consider stochastic hyperelastic material models described by a strain-energy density where the parameters are characterised by probability distributions. These models, which are constructed through a Bayesian identification procedure, rely on the maximum entropy principle and enable the propagation of uncertainties from input data to output quantities of interest. Similar modelling approaches can be developed for other mechanical systems. To demonstrate the effect of probabilistic model parameters on large strain elastic responses, specific case studies include the classic problem of the Rivlin cube, the radial oscillatory motion of cylindrical and spherical shells, and the cavitation and finite amplitude oscillations of spheres.

Thu, 30 May 2019

14:00 - 15:00
L4

Near-best adaptive approximation

Professor Peter Binev
(University of South Carolina)
Abstract

One of the major steps in the adaptive finite element methods (AFEM) is the adaptive selection of the next partition. The process is usually governed by a strategy based on carefully chosen local error indicators and aims at convergence results with optimal rates. One can formally relate the refinement of the partitions with growing an oriented graph or a tree. Then each node of the tree/graph corresponds to a cell of a partition and the approximation of a function on adaptive partitions can be expressed trough the local errors related to the cell, i.e., the node. The total approximation error is then calculated as the sum of the errors on the leaves (the terminal nodes) of the tree/graph and the problem of finding an optimal error for a given budget of nodes is known as tree approximation. Establishing a near-best tree approximation result is a key ingredient in proving optimal convergence rates for AFEM.

 

The classical tree approximation problems are usually related to the so-called h-adaptive approximation in which the improvements a due to reducing the size of the cells in the partition. This talk will consider also an extension of this framework to hp-adaptive approximation allowing different polynomial spaces to be used for the local approximations at different cells while maintaining the near-optimality in terms of the combined number of degrees of freedom used in the approximation.

 

The problem of conformity of the resulting partition will be discussed as well. Typically in AFEM, certain elements of the current partition are marked and subdivided together with some additional ones to maintain desired properties of the partition like conformity. This strategy is often described as “mark → subdivide → complete”. The process is very well understood for triangulations received via newest vertex bisection procedure. In particular, it is proven that the number of elements in the final partition is limited by constant times the number of marked cells. This hints at the possibility to design a marking procedure that is limited only to cells of the partition whose subdivision will result in a conforming partition and therefore no completion step would be necessary. This talk will present such a strategy together with theoretical results about its near-optimal performance.

Thu, 30 May 2019

12:00 - 13:00
L4

Semiflow selection for the isentropic Euler system (joint work with E. Feireisl & M. Hofmanova)

Dominic Breit
(Heriot Watt University)
Abstract

It is nowadays well understood that the multidimensional isentropic Euler system is desperately ill–posed. Even certain smooth initial data give rise to infinitely many solutions and all available selection criteria fail to ensure both global existence and uniqueness. We propose a different approach to well–posedness of this system based on ideas from the theory of Markov semigroups: we show the existence of a Borel measurable solution semiflow. To this end, we introduce a notion of dissipative solution which is understood as time dependent trajectories of the basic state variables - the mass density, the linear momentum, and the energy - in a suitable phase space. The underlying system of PDEs is satisfied in a generalized sense. The solution semiflow enjoys the standard semigroup property and the solutions coincide with the strong solutions as long as the latter exist. Moreover, they minimize the energy (maximize the energy dissipation) among all dissipative solutions.

Wed, 29 May 2019

18:00 - 19:00
L1

Marcus du Sautoy - The Creativity Code: How AI is learning to write, paint and think

Marcus du Sautoy
(University of Oxford)
Further Information

Oxford Mathematics Public Lectures together with the Simonyi Science Show:

Will a computer ever compose a symphony, write a prize-winning novel, or paint a masterpiece? And if so, would we be able to tell the difference?

In The Creativity Code, Marcus du Sautoy examines the nature of creativity, as well as providing an essential guide into how algorithms work, and the mathematical rules underpinning them. He asks how much of our emotional response to art is a product of our brains reacting to pattern and structure. And might machines one day jolt us in to being more imaginative ourselves?

Marcus du Sautoy is Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science in Oxford.

6-7pm
Mathematical Institute
Oxford

Please email @email to register.

Watch live:
https://facebook.com/OxfordMathematics
https://livestream.com/oxuni/du-Sautoy2

The Oxford Mathematics Public Lectures are generously supported by XTX Markets.

Wed, 29 May 2019
16:00
C1

Leighton's Theorem

Sam Shepherd
(Oxford University)
Abstract

Leighton's Theorem states that if two finite graphs have a common universal cover then they have a common finite cover. I will present a new proof of this using groupoids, and then talk about two generalisations of the theorem that can also be tackled with this groupoid approach: one gives us control over the local structure of the common finite cover, and the other deals with graphs of spaces.

Wed, 29 May 2019
11:00
N3.12

Hilbert's Fifth Problem

Arturo Rodriguez
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

Hilbert's fifth problem asks informally what is the difference between Lie groups and topological groups. In 1950s this problem was solved by Andrew Gleason, Deane Montgomery, Leo Zippin and Hidehiko Yamabe concluding that every locally compact topological group is "essentially" a Lie group. In this talk we will show the complete proof of this theorem.

Tue, 28 May 2019
16:00
C5

Celestial Amplitudes: conformal partial waves and soft theorems

Dhritiman Nandan
(Southampton)
Abstract

 Massless scattering amplitudes in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime can be Mellin transformed to correlation functions on the celestial sphere at null infinity called celestial amplitudes. We study various properties of massless four-point scalar and gluon celestial amplitudes such as conformal partial wave decomposition, crossing relations and optical theorem. As a byproduct, we derive the analog of the single and double soft limits for all gluon celestial amplitudes.

Tue, 28 May 2019
16:00
L5

Emergence of Apparent Horizon in General Relativity

Xinliang An
(National University of Singapore)
Abstract

Black holes are predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity, and now we have ample observational evidence for their existence. However theoretically there are many unanswered questions about how black holes come into being. In this talk, with tools from hyperbolic PDE, quasilinear elliptic equations and geometric analysis, we will prove that, through a nonlinear focusing effect, initially low-amplitude and diffused gravitational waves can give birth to a trapped (black hole) region in our universe. This result extends the 2008 Christodoulou’s monumental work and it also proves a conjecture of Ashtekar on black-hole thermodynamics

Tue, 28 May 2019

15:30 - 16:30
L4

Moduli of hypersurfaces in weighted projective space

Dominic Bunnett
(FU Berlin)
Abstract

The moduli space of smooth hypersurfaces in projective space was constructed by Mumford in the 60’s using his newly developed classical (a.k.a. reductive) Geometric Invariant Theory.  I wish to generalise this construction to hypersurfaces in weighted projective space (or more generally orbifold toric varieties). The automorphism group of a toric variety is in general non-reductive and I will use new results in non-reductive GIT, developed by F. Kirwan et al., to construct a moduli space of quasismooth hypersurfaces in certain weighted projective spaces. I will give geometric characterisations of notions of stability arising from non-reductive GIT.

Tue, 28 May 2019

14:30 - 15:00
L5

Optimisation of 1D Piecewise Smooth Functions

Jonathan Grant-Peters
(Oxford)
Abstract

Optimisation in 1D is far simpler than multidimensional optimisation and this is largely due to the notion of a bracket. A bracket is a trio of points such that the middle point is the one with the smallest objective function value (of the three). The existence of a bracket is sufficient to guarantee that a continuous function has a local minimum within the bracket. The most stable 1D optimisation methods, such as Golden Section or Brent's Method, make use of this fact. The mentality behind these methods is to maintain a bracket at all times, all the while finding smaller brackets until the local minimum can be guaranteed to lie within a sufficiently small range. For smooth functions, Brent's method in particular converges quickly with a minimum of function evaluations required. However, when applied to a piece-wise smooth functions, it achieves its realistic worst case convergence rate. In this presentation, I will present a new method which uses ideas from Brent and Golden Section, while being designed to converge quickly for piece-wise smooth functions.

Tue, 28 May 2019

14:15 - 15:30
L4

Linear characters of Sylow subgroups of the symmetric group

Stacey Law
(Oxford University)
Abstract

Let $p$ be an odd prime and $n$ a natural number. We determine the irreducible constituents of the permutation module induced by the action of the symmetric group $S_n$ on the cosets of a Sylow $p$-subgroup $P_n$. In the course of this work, we also prove a symmetric group analogue of a well-known result of Navarro for $p$-solvable groups on a conjugacy action of $N_G(P)$. Before describing some consequences of these results, we will give an overview of the background and recent related results in the area.

Tue, 28 May 2019

14:00 - 14:30
L5

On divergence-free methods for double-diffusion equations in porous media

Paul Méndez
(Concepción)
Abstract

A stationary Navier-Stokes-Brinkman model coupled to a system of advection-diffusion equations serves as a model for so-called double-diffusive viscous flow in porous mediain which both heat and a solute within the fluid phase are subject to transport and diffusion. The solvability analysis of these governing equations results as a combination of compactness arguments and fixed-point theory. In addition an H(div)-conforming discretisation is formulated by a modification of existing methods for Brinkman flows. The well-posedness ofthe discrete Galerkin formulation is also discussed, and convergence properties are derived rigorously. Computational tests confirm the predicted rates of error decay and illustrate the applicability of the methods for the simulation of bacterial bioconvection and thermohaline circulation problems.

Tue, 28 May 2019

12:00 - 13:15
L4

The Swampland, Holography and the Large Volume Scenario

Joseph Conlon
(Oxford)
Abstract

String compactifications are essential for connecting string theory to low energy particle physics and cosmology. Moduli stabilisation gives rise to effective Lagrangians that capture the low-energy degrees of freedom. Much recent interest has been on swampland consistency conditions on such effective
field theories - which low energy Lagrangians can arise from quantum gravity? Furthermore, given that moduli stabilisation scenarios often exist in AdS space, we can also ask: what do swampland conditions mean in the context of AdS/CFT? I describe work on developing a holographic understanding of moduli stabilisation and swampland consistency conditions. I focus in particular on the Large Volume Scenario, which is especially appealing from a holographic perspective as in the large volume limit all its interactions can be expressed solely in terms of the AdS radius, with no free dimensionless parameters.

 

Tue, 28 May 2019

12:00 - 13:00
C4

Noise in coevolving networks

Marina Diakonova
(Environmental Change Institute --- University of Oxford)
Abstract


Coupling dynamics of the states of the nodes of a network to the dynamics of the network topology leads to generic absorbing and fragmentation transitions. The coevolving voter model is a typical system that exhibits such transitions at some critical rewiring. We study the robustness of these transitions under two distinct ways of introducing noise. Noise affecting all the nodes destroys the absorbing-fragmentation transition, giving rise in finite-size systems to two regimes: bimodal magnetization and dynamic fragmentation. Noise targeting a fraction of nodes preserves the transitions but introduces shattered fragmentation with its characteristic fraction of isolated nodes and one or two giant components. Both the lack of absorbing state for homogeneous noise and the shift in the absorbing transition to higher rewiring for targeted noise are supported by analytical approximations.

Paper Link:

https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.032803

Mon, 27 May 2019
15:45
L6

Secondary invariants and mock modularity

Theo Johnson-Freyd
(Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics)
Abstract

A two-dimensional, minimally Supersymmetric Quantum Field Theory is "nullhomotopic" if it can be deformed to one with spontaneous supersymmetry breaking, including along deformations that are allowed to "flow up" along RG flow lines. SQFTs modulo nullhomotopic SQFTs form a graded abelian group $SQFT_\bullet$. There are many SQFTs with nonzero index; these are definitely not nullhomotopic, and indeed represent nontorision classes in $SQFT_\bullet$. But relations to topological modular forms suggests that $SQFT_\bullet$ also has rich torsion. Based on an analysis of mock modularity and holomorphic anomalies, I will describe explicitly a "secondary invariant" of SQFTs and use it to show that a certain element of $SQFT_3$ has exact order $24$. This work is joint with D. Gaiotto and E. Witten.

Fri, 24 May 2019

16:00 - 17:00
L1

How to give a bad talk

Philip Maini
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

What is the point of giving a talk?  What is the point of going to a talk?  In this presentation, which is intended to have a lot of audience participation, I would like to explore how one should prepare talks for different audiences and different occasions, and what one should try to get out of going to a talk.

Fri, 24 May 2019

15:30 - 16:00
N3.12

Random Geometric Complexes

Oliver Vipond
(Oxford University)
Abstract

I will give an introduction to the asymptotic behaviour of random geometric complexes. In the specific case of a simplicial complex realised as the Cech complex of a point process sampled from a closed Riemannian manifold, we will explore conditions which guarantee the homology of the Cech complex coincides with the homology of the underlying manifold. We will see techniques which were originally developed to study random geometric graphs, which together with ideas from Morse Theory establish homological connectivity thresholds.

Fri, 24 May 2019
15:00
N3.12

Spectrograms and Persistent Homology

Wojciech Reise
(EPFL)
Abstract

I will give an overview of audio identification methods on spectral representations of songs. I will outline the persistent homology-based approaches that I propose and their shortcomings. I hope that the review of previous work will help spark a discussion on new possible representations and filtrations.

Fri, 24 May 2019

14:00 - 15:00
L1

Prelims Preparation

Dr Vicky Neale and Dr Richard Earl
Abstract

The last Fridays@2 of the year will be the Prelims Preparation Lecture aimed at first-year undergraduates. Richard Earl and Vicky Neale will highlight some key points to be aware of as you prepare for exams, thinking both about exam technique and revision strategy, and a student will offer some tips from their personal experience.  This will complement the Friday@2 event in Week 2, on Managing exam anxiety.  As part of the Prelims Preparation session, we'll look through two past exam questions, giving tips on how to structure a good answer.  You'll find that most helpful if you've worked through the questions yourself beforehand, so this is advance notice so that you can slot the questions into your timetable for the next few days.  They are both from 2013, one is Q5 from Maths I (on the Groups and Group Actions course), and the other is Q3 from Maths IV (on the Dynamics course).  You can access these, and a large collection of other past Prelims exam questions, via the archive.

Fri, 24 May 2019

14:00 - 15:30
L6

Diabatic vortices: a simple model of tropical cyclones and the martian polar vortex

Prof. Richard Scott
(University of St Andrews)
Abstract

In this talk, we will consider how two very different atmospheric phenomena, the terrestrial tropical cyclone and the martian polar vortex, can be described within a single simplified dynamical framework based on the forced shallow water equations. Dynamical forcings include angular momentum transport by secondary (transverse) circulations and local heating due to latent heat release. The forcings act in very different ways in the two systems but in both cases lead to distinct annular distributions of potential vorticity, with a local vorticity maximum at a finite radius surrounding a central minimum.  In both systems, the resulting vorticity distributions are subject to shear instability and the degree of eddy growth versus annular persistence can be examined explicitly under different forcing scenarios.

Fri, 24 May 2019

13:15 - 17:15
L5

Groups and Geometry in the South East

Panos Papazoglou, Laura Ciobanu, Ian Leary
(Various)
Further Information

1:15-2:15 Isoperimetric inequalities of Groups and Isoperimetric Profiles of surfaces - Panos Papazoglou

It is an interesting question whether Gromov's `gap theorem' between a sub-quadratic and a linear isoperimetric inequality can be generalized in higher dimensions. There is some evidence (and a conjecture) that this might be the case for CAT(0) groups. In this talk I will explain how the gap theorem relates to past work of Hersch and Young-Yau on Cheeger constants of surfaces and of Lipton-Tarjan on planar graphs. I will present some related problems in curvature-free geometry and will use these ideas to give an example of a surface with discontinuous isoperimetric profile answering a question of Nardulli-Pansu. (joint work with E. Swenson).

2:30-3:30 Title tba - Laura Ciobanu

Abstract tba

3:30-4:15 Tea/coffee

4:15-5:15 CAT(0) groups need not be biautomatic - Ian Leary

Ashot Minasyan and I construct (or should that be find?) examples of groups that establish the result in the title. These groups also fail to have Wise's property: they contain a pair of elements no powers of which generate either a free subgroup or a free abelian subgroup. I will discuss these groups.

Thu, 23 May 2019

16:00 - 17:00
L6

The Sum-Product Phenomenon

George Shakan
(Oxford University)
Abstract

In 1983, Erdos and Szemerédi conjectured that for any finite subset of the integers, either the sumset or the product set has nearly quadratic growth. Applications include incidence geometry, exponential sums, compressed image sensing, computer science, and elsewhere. We discuss recent progress towards the main conjecture and related questions. 

Thu, 23 May 2019
16:00
C4

Quantum Invariants - The Jones Polynomial as a bridge between algebra and topology

Cristina Palmer-Anghel
(Oxford University)
Abstract

The world of quantum invariants began in 1983 with the discovery of the Jones polynomial. Later on, Reshetikhin and Turaev developed an algebraic machinery that provides knot invariants. This algebraic construction leads to a sequence of quantum generalisations of this invariant, called coloured Jones polynomials. The original Jones polynomial can be defined by so called skein relations. However, unlike other classical invariants for knots like the Alexander polynomial, its relation to the topology of the complement is still a mysterious and deep question. On the topological side, R. Lawrence defined a sequence of braid group representations on the homology of coverings of configuration spaces. Then, based on her work, Bigelow gave a topological model for the Jones polynomial, as a graded intersection pairing between certain homology classes. We aim to create a bridge between these theories, which interplays between representation theory and low dimensional topology. We describe the Bigelow-Lawrence model, emphasising the construction of the homology classes. Then, we show that the sequence of coloured Jones polynomials can be seen through the same formalism, as topological intersection pairings of homology classes in coverings of the configuration space in the punctured disc.

Thu, 23 May 2019

16:00 - 17:30
L3

From structure to dynamics in chemical reaction networks

Dr. Murad Banaji
(Middlesex)
Abstract

Chemical reaction network (CRN) theory focusses on making claims about dynamical behaviours of reaction networks which are, as far as possible, dependent on the network structure but independent of model details such as functions chosen and parameter values. The claims are generally about the existence, nature and stability of limit sets, and the possibility of bifurcations, in models of CRNs with particular structural features. The methodologies developed can often be applied to large classes of models occurring in biology and engineering, including models whose origins are not chemical in nature. Many results have a natural algorithmic formulation. Apart from the potential for application, the results are often pleasing mathematically for their power and generality. 

This talk will concern some recent themes in CRN theory, particularly focussed on how the presence or absence of particular subnetworks ("motifs") influences allowed dynamical behaviours in ODE models of a CRN. A number of recent results take the form: "a CRN containing no subnetworks satisfying condition X cannot display behaviour of type Y"; but also, in the opposite direction, "if a CRN contains a subnetwork satisfying condition X, then some model of this CRN from class C admits behaviour of type Y". The proofs of such results draw on a variety of techniques from analysis, algebra, combinatorics, and convex geometry. I'll describe some of these results, outline their proofs, and sketch some current challenges in this area. 
 

Thu, 23 May 2019

14:00 - 15:00
L4

Operator preconditioning and some recent developments for boundary integral equations

Dr Carolina Urzua Torres
(Mathematical Institute (University of Oxford))
Abstract

In this talk, I am going to give an introduction to operator preconditioning as a general and robust strategy to precondition linear systems arising from Galerkin discretization of PDEs or Boundary Integral Equations. Then, in order to illustrate the applicability of this preconditioning technique, I will discuss the simple case of weakly singular and hypersingular integral equations, arising from exterior Dirichlet and Neumann BVPs for the Laplacian in 3D. Finally, I will show how we can also tackle operators with a more difficult structure, like the electric field integral equation (EFIE) on screens, which models the scattering of time-harmonic electromagnetic waves at perfectly conducting bounded infinitely thin objects, like patch antennas in 3D.

Thu, 23 May 2019

13:00 - 14:00
L4

Monotone Solutions to the Moral Hazard Problem

Hanqing Jin
(Oxford University)
Abstract

We investigate monotone solutions of the moral hazard problems without the monotone likelihood ratio property. The solutions are explicitly characterised by a concave envelope relaxation approach for a two-action model in which the principal is risk neutral or exhibits constant absolute risk aversion.  

Thu, 23 May 2019

12:00 - 13:00
L4

Fractional wave equations

Ljubica Oparnica
(University of Novi Sad)
Abstract

The classical wave equation is derived from the system of three equations: The equation of motion of a (one-dimensional) deformable body, the Hook law as a constitutive equation, and the  strain measure, and describes wave propagation in elastic media. 
Fractional wave equations describe wave phenomena when viscoelasticity of a material or non-local effects of a material comes into an account. For waves in viscoelastic media, instead of Hook's law, a constitutive equation for viscoelastic body,  for example, Fractional Zener model or distributed order model of viscoelastic body, is used. To consider non-local effects of a media, one may replace classical strain measure by non-local strain measure. There are other constitutive equations and other ways to describe non-local effects which will be discussed within the talk.  
The system of three equations subject to initial conditions, initial displacement and initial velocity, is equivalent to one single equation, called fractional wave equation. Using different models for constitutive equations, and non-local measures, different fractional wave equations are obtained. After derivation of such equations, existence and uniqueness of their solution in the spaces of distributions is proved by the use of Laplace and Fourier transforms as main tool. Plots of solutions are presented. For some of derived equations microlocal analysis of the solution is conducted. 

Thu, 23 May 2019
11:30
C4

Parameterization

Alex Wilkie
(Oxford University)
Abstract

I will give an introduction to the theory of definable parameterization of definable sets in the o-minimal context and its application to diophantine problems. I will then go on to discuss uniformity issues with particular reference to the subanalytic case. This is joint work with Jonathan Pila and Raf Cluckers

Wed, 22 May 2019
16:00
C1

Outer automorphism groups of right-angled Coxeter groups

Andrew Sale
(University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Abstract

The last decade or so has seen substantial progress in the theory of (outer) automorphism groups of right-angled Artin groups (RAAGs), spearheaded by work of Charney and Vogtmann. Many of the techniques used for RAAGs also apply to a wider class of groups, graph products of finitely generated abelian groups, which includes right-angled Coxeter groups (RACGs). In this talk, I will give an introduction to automorphism groups of such graph products, and describe recent developments surrounding the outer automorphism groups of RACGs, explaining the links to what we know in the RAAG case.

Tue, 21 May 2019

15:30 - 16:30
L4

Equivariant Hilbert scheme of points on K3 surfaces and modular forms

Adam Gyenge
(Oxford)
Abstract

Let $X$ be a K3 surface and let $Z_X(q)$ be the generating series of the topological Euler characteristics of the Hilbert scheme of points on $X$. It is known that $q/Z_X(q)$ equals the discriminant form $\Delta(\tau)$ after the change of variables $q=e^{2 \pi i \tau}$. In this talk we consider the equivariant generalization of this result, when a finite group $G$ acts on $X$ symplectically. Mukai and Xiao has shown that there are exactly 81 possibilities for such an action in terms of types of the fixed points. The analogue of $q/Z_X(q)$ in each of the 81 cases turns out to be a cusp form (after the same change of variables). Knowledge of modular forms is not assumed in the talk; I will introduce all necessary concepts. Joint work with Jim Bryan.

Tue, 21 May 2019

14:30 - 15:00
L5

A Model-Based Derivative-Free Approach to Black-Box Adversarial Examples in Deep Learning

Giuseppe Ughi
(Oxford)
Abstract

Neural Network algorithms have achieved unprecedented performance in image recognition over the past decade. However, their application in real world use-cases, such as self driving cars, raises the question of whether it is safe to rely on them.

We generally associate the robustness of these algorithms with how easy it is to generate an adversarial example: a tiny perturbation of an image which leads it to be misclassified by the Neural Net (which classifies the original image correctly). Neural Nets are strongly susceptible to such adversarial examples, but when the architecture of the target neural net is unknown to the attacker it becomes more difficult to generate these examples efficiently.

In this Black-Box setting, we frame the generation of an adversarial example as an optimisation problem solvable via derivative free optimisation methods. Thus, we introduce an algorithm based on the BOBYQA model-based method and compare this to the current state of the art algorithm.

Tue, 21 May 2019

14:30 - 15:30

Intervals in the Hales-Jewett Theorem

Christoph Spiegel
Further Information

The Hales–Jewett Theorem states that any r–colouring of [m]^n contains a monochromatic combinatorial line if n is large enough. Shelah’s proof of the theorem implies that for m = 3 there always exists a monochromatic combinatorial line whose set of active coordinates is the union of at most r intervals. I will present some recent findings relating to this observation. This is joint work with Nina Kamcev.

Tue, 21 May 2019
14:15
L4

A simple proof of the classification of unitary highest weight modules

Pavle Pandzic
(University of Zagreb)
Abstract

Unitary highest weight modules were classified in the 1980s by Enright-Howe-Wallach and independently by Jakobsen. The classification is based on a version of the Dirac inequality, but the proofs also require a number of other techniques and are quite involved. We present a much simpler proof based on a different version of the Dirac inequality. This is joint work with Vladimir Soucek and Vit Tucek.
 

Tue, 21 May 2019

14:00 - 17:00
C5

COXIC: Complexity Oxford Imperial College

Further Information

Complexity Oxford Imperial College, COXIC, is a series of workshops aiming at bringing together researchers in Oxford and Imperial College interested in complex systems. The events take place twice a year, alternatively in Oxford and in London, and give the possibility to PhD students and young postdocs to present their research.


Schedule:
2:00: Welcome
2:15: Maria del Rio Chanona (OX), On the structure and dynamics of the job market
2:35: Max Falkenberg McGillivray (IC), Modelling the broken heart
2:55: Fernando Rosas (OX), Quantifying high-order interdependencies
 

3:15 - 4:00: Coffee break
 

4:00: Rishi Nalin Kumar (IC), Building scalable agent based models using open source technologies
4:20: Rodrigo Leal Cervantes (OX) Greed Optimisation of Modularity with a Self-Adaptive Resolution Parameter
4:40: TBC
 

5:00: Social event at the Lamb & Flag

Tue, 21 May 2019

14:00 - 14:30
L5

Time-Varying Matrix Problems and Zhang Neural Networks

Frank Uhlig
(Auburn)
Abstract

We adapt convergent look-ahead and backward finite difference formulas to compute future eigenvectors and eigenvalues of piecewise smooth time-varying matrix flows $A(t)$. This is based on the Zhang Neural Network model for time-varying problems and uses the associated error function

$E(t) =A(t)V(t)−V(t)D(t)$

with the Zhang design stipulation

$\dot{E}(t) =−\eta E(t)$.

Here $E(t)$ decreased exponentially over time for $\eta >0$. It leads to a discrete-time differential equation of the form $P(t_k)\dot{z}(t_k) = q(t_k)$ for the eigendata vector $z(t_k)$ of $A(t_k)$. Convergent high order look-ahead difference formulas then allow us to express $z(t_k+1)$ in terms of earlier discrete $A$ and $z$ data. Numerical tests, comparisons and open questions follow.

Tue, 21 May 2019

12:45 - 14:00
C3

Optimising the parallel picking strategy for a Besi component wafer

Jonathan Grant-Peters
(University of Oxford)
Abstract

The time bottleneck in the manufacturing process of Besi (company involved in ESGI 149 Innsbruck) is the extraction of undamaged dies from a component wafer. The easiest way for them to speed up this process is to reduce the number of 'selections' made by the robotic arm.  Each 'selection' made by this robotic arm can be thought of as choosing a 2x2 submatix of a large binary matrix, and editing the 1's in this submatrix to be 0's.  The quesiton is: what is the fewest number of 2x2 submatrices required to cover the full matrix, and how can we find this number. This problem can be solved exactly using integer programming methods, although this approach proves to be prohibitively expensive for realistic sizes. In this talk I will describe the approach taken by my team at EGSI 149, as well as directions for further improvement.

Tue, 21 May 2019
12:00
L4

Combinatorial structures in cosmology

Paolo Benincasa
(Copenhagen)
Abstract

  Our understanding of physical phenomena is intimately linked to the way we understand the relevant observables describing them. While a big deal of progress has been made for processes occurring in flat space-time, much less is known in cosmological settings. In this context, we have processes which happened in the past and which we can detect the remnants of at present time. Thus, the relevant observable is the late-time wavefunction of the universe. Questions such as "what properties they ought to satisfy in order to come from a consistent time evolution in cosmological space-times?", are still unanswered, and are compelling given that in these quantities time is effectively integrated out. In this talk I will report on some recent progress in this direction, aiming towards the idea of a formulation of cosmology "without time". Amazingly enough, a new mathematical structure, we called "cosmological polytope", which has its own first principle definition, encodes the singularity structure we ascribe to the perturbative wavefunction of the universe, and makes explicit its (surprising) relation to the flat-space S-matrix. I will stress how the cosmological polytopes allow us to: compute the wavefunction of the universe at arbitrary points and arbitrary loops (with novel representations for it); interpret the residues of its poles in terms of flat-space processes; provide a  general geometrical proof for the flat-space cutting rules; reconstruct the perturbative wavefunction from the knowledge of the flat-space S-matrix and a subset of symmetries enjoyed by the wavefunction.

Tue, 21 May 2019

12:00 - 13:00
C4

Graph-based classification of opinions in free-response surveys

Takaaki Aoki
(Kagawa University)
Abstract

Social surveys are widely used in today's society as a method for obtaining opinions and other information from large groups of people. The questions in social surveys are usually presented in either multiple-choice or free-response formats. Despite their advantages, free-response questions are employed less commonly in large-scale surveys, because in such situations, considerable effort is needed to categorise and summarise the resulting large dataset. This is the so-called coding problem. Here we propose a survey framework in which, respondents not only write down their own opinions, but also input information characterising the similarity between their individual responses and those of other respondents. This is done in much the same way as ``likes" are input in social network services. The information input in this simple procedure constitutes relational data among opinions, which we call the opinion graph. The diversity of typical opinions can be identified as a modular structure of such a graph, and the coding problem is solved through graph clustering in a statistically principled manner. We demonstrate our approach using a poll on the 2016 US presidential election and a survey given to graduates of a particular university.

Mon, 20 May 2019
16:00
L4

On the Type I blow-up for the incompressible Euler equations

Dongho Chae
(Chung-Ang University Seoul)
Abstract

In this talk we discuss the Type I blow up and the related problems in the 3D Euler equations. We say a solution $v$ to the Euler equations satisfies Type I condition at possible blow up time $T_*$ if $\lim\sup_{t\nearrow T_*} (T_*-t) \|\nabla v(t)\|_{L^\infty} <+\infty$. The scenario of Type I blow up is a natural generalization of the self-similar(or discretely self-similar) blow up. We present some recent progresses of our study regarding this. We first localize previous result that ``small Type I blow up'' is absent. After that we show that the atomic concentration of energy is excluded under the Type I condition. This result, in particular, solves the problem of removing discretely self-similar blow up in the energy conserving scale, since one point energy concentration is necessarily accompanied with such blow up. We also localize the Beale-Kato-Majda type blow up criterion. Using similar local blow up criterion for the 2D Boussinesq equations, we can show that Type I and some of Type II blow up in a region off the axis can be excluded in the axisymmetric Euler equations. These are joint works with J. Wolf.

Mon, 20 May 2019
15:45
L6

Rational cobordisms and integral homology

Paolo Aceto
(Oxford)
Abstract

We prove that every rational homology cobordism class in the subgroup generated
by lens spaces contains a unique connected sum of lens spaces whose first homology embeds in
any other element in the same class. As a consequence we show that several natural maps to
the rational homology cobordism group have infinite rank cokernels, and obtain a divisibility
condition between the determinants of certain 2-bridge knots and other knots in the same
concordance class. This is joint work with Daniele Celoria and JungHwan Park.